- Joined
- Jul 22, 2002
- Posts
- 15,644
- Reaction score
- 15,308
fyi for trade down proponents (I am one):
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I'll be pretty upset of both Nolan and Grant are on the board and we go OG instead...I'm ok with a great guard if Booker is a safe pick. Everyone seems to indicate he starts day 1 and plays solid for years..I'm good with that pick as long as there isn't a better pass rusher there. Like a dbl digit edge guy.
tough to call. If there is a legit guard or tackle that slides to 16, one could argue that is more a position of need.I'll be pretty upset of both Nolan and Grant are on the board and we go OG instead...
Im mixed. I want a dominant defense. But with question marks regarding Hernandez I cant help but get PTSD flashbacks of that seattle d line meeting kyler at the top of his dropback because our guards were insufficient. Kyler, more than any QB I have ever seen, gets really antsy when the middle of the line is weak...so a guard would be okay at 16..positional value be damned...so long as the guy is legit and maybe gets 6 or 7 pro bowl nods and plays a decade without serious injury.I'll be pretty upset of both Nolan and Grant are on the board and we go OG instead...
IMO you’ll have to get used to Murray being jittery. If he hasn’t got past that by now, he never will. He sometimes anticipates pressure that doesn’t even exist. It does behove the Cards to develop the strongest line possible, but he seems to lack confidence though he claims to be in control. Fortunately his agility and speed allow him to get away with breaking up a play. I think the best strategy is an impenetrable defense.Im mixed. I want a dominant defense. But with question marks regarding Hernandez I cant help but get PTSD flashbacks of that seattle d line meeting kyler at the top of his dropback because our guards were insufficient. Kyler, more than any QB I have ever seen, gets really antsy when the middle of the line is weak...so a guard would be okay at 16..positional value be damned...so long as the guy is legit and maybe gets 6 or 7 pro bowl nods and plays a decade without serious injury.
yeah its in his makeup. but there is a very noticeable difference between his confidence in the pocket when Will Hernandez was playing versus after Hernandez went out. The trust was gone...IMO you’ll have to get used to Murray being jittery. If he hasn’t got past that by now, he never will. He sometimes anticipates pressure that doesn’t even exist. It does behove the Cards to develop the strongest line possible, but he seems to lack confidence though he claims to be in control. Fortunately his agility and speed allow him to get away with breaking up a play. I think the best strategy is an impenetrable defense.
I will have even more issues if they do something stupid like draft one of the boys from A&M based on athletic measurables but subpar performance doing the actual sport of footballWould have been a good scheme fit if they had not drafted Darius Robinson, signed Calais Campbell and re-signed Collier. Now, not so much. Plus, a super-talented DT with maturity-issues from Ole Miss? I still have PTSD after Nkemdiche.
word on the street is they have a gentlemens agreement with Hernandez based on his recoverywhy haven't we re-signed hernandez? because monti already spent a whole bunch of money? because he can get the best guard in the draft for far cheaper and incredibly longer that isn't coming off surgery? we like hernandez but we liked kyzir too - we already re-signed zae jones - if we were going to re-sign hernandez... are we going to re-sign hernandez?
and plays for usso long as the guy is legit and maybe gets 6 or 7 pro bowl nods and plays a decade without serious injury.
why haven't we re-signed hernandez? because monti already spent a whole bunch of money? because he can get the best guard in the draft for far cheaper and incredibly longer that isn't coming off surgery? we like hernandez but we liked kyzir too - we already re-signed zae jones - if we were going to re-sign hernandez... are we going to re-sign hernandez?
Overall I agree. What makes it interesting for me is that I believe #16 range is where that slightly better player would fall to.fyi for trade down proponents (I am one):
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
If Grant is staring them in the face, but they instead take an offensive player (any offensive player), I will start crying. Grant is potentially exactly what they need.I'll be pretty upset of both Nolan and Grant are on the board and we go OG instead...
The case of Shemar Stewart is more nuanced than only the box score. He was much more disruptive than people can see from stats. Also, the draft is about potential, and you can argue that Stewart has the biggest potential of any player in the draft.I will have even more issues if they do something stupid like draft one of the boys from A&M based on athletic measurables but subpar performance doing the actual sport of football
That would be Keimy.Tony Pauline has updated his mock. He is one of the best
![]()
2025 NFL Mock Draft 6.0: Shedeur Sanders falls to Saints, 49ers find Trent Williams’ successor, Emeka Egbuka heads to AFC West, and more
Now that the majority of big-name free agents have been signed, and teams have re-signed many of their own veterans, it’s time to update the mock draft.www.sportskeeda.com
I’m getting more and more hooked on Banks.If Grant is staring them in the face, but they instead take an offensive player (any offensive player), I will start crying. Grant is potentially exactly what they need.
Banks is an OTNo S, ILBer, or OG in the 1st, please. Let's not be dumb with this Edge and DT class starting us in the face.
A LT that has been talked about being moved to G.Banks is an OT
See one post down. This is what I was recalling.Banks is an OT
Disagree. Do you think PJJ was a disaster as a rookie? Moving sides is not that difficult. College teams put their best player at blindside. That doesn’t mean he’s a blind side in the NFL. Just that he was the best player at TexasA LT that has been talked about being moved to G.
Him never playing on the right side in his football career(even dating back to HS) expecting him to flourish is an extremely huge risk this team better not take.
No prominent OT wants to move to guard. While the slot locks his early money, long term it’s financially a mistake. He’s pretty much viewed as LT only as far as side. Johnson looks good on the left and likely stays there for many years. I don’t think an early first rounder would appreciate a guard move.A LT that has been talked about being moved to G.
Him never playing on the right side in his football career(even dating back to HS) expecting him to flourish is an extremely huge risk this team better not take.