When I speak of explosiveness I am talking about the guy isn't going to dunk over someone in the paint. He is Parker like in that he can get into the paint at will and has a nice pull up jumper. He can knock down 3's so he is a much better prospect than Marshall.
I think it's important to be honest when evaluating players, but it's also important to not exaggerate comparisons (especially bad ones.)
To get to the rim, you have to have a
decent first step. Ennis doesn't have it. Watching him try to drive to the hoop in an isolation is flat-out hilarious. He is not strong and he shies away from contact.
Having said that, he is NOT Kendall Marshall. That comparison is ridiculous. Marshall is a terrible shooter. Ennis may not be a great shooter, but he can hit an open jumper or an open and set three pointer. That's enough for the defense to have to respect him enough to not back away and just dare him to shoot. He can also hit a jumper in a pick and roll situation if the defender goes under. Again, he is no Steve Nash, but he is no more Kandall Marshall than he is Steve Nash.
We don't know how bad his defense is gonna be, considering he played in Syracuse. I am assuming it's not going to be good due to his lack of athleticism and lateral quickness, though his length may mitigate SOME of that.
Problem with Marshall was that outside of passing, he really could not do anything. He couldn't shoot to save his life, and he couldn't guard a chair.
Ennis is simply not an incompetent shooter. He is not a great shooter, but he is good enough that you have to respect his shot. I am not sold on Ennis at all, but I am sold on the fact that he is not Marshall.