Why wouldn't you attempt to ensure everyone's replacement is of the highest quality possible? We didn't do anything to prepare for the departure of Dan Williams.
This logic makes no sense. Why not draft a replacement for Rashad Johnson in the first round? Jonathan Cooper?
You want to ensure that a player's potential replacement is of the highest quality as is reasonable. Right tackle is your fourth- or fifth-most important OL position. Drafting a first-rounder to sub out that player feels a lot like a budget play (maybe get 85% - 110% of the production at 40% of the cost) than an improving your team play.
I feel like the discussion of wanting to build the team through the draft is increasingly hot air. Part of building a team through the draft is re-signing your players--including your middle-roster veterans like Massie.
Spot on