2017-2018 Draft Prospects watch.

Errntknght

Registered User
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
6,342
Reaction score
319
Location
Phoenix
The Stepien has moved Ayton way down.

Tier 1. Doncic
Tier 2. Trae Young
Tier 3. Jackson, Porter, Ayton (in that order)
Tier 4. Bagley, Bridges, Bamba (in that order) with more following.

Yikes.

Yikes is right but I hope that's the final order since we're more likely drafting 4-8 than 1-3. Not that I follow college ball enough to know much but from watching a few highlights and listening to you guys talk, my wish list is (in order) Ayton, Bamba, Jackson, Bagley.

I'm happy with our backcourt and wings but we need talent up front... I'm all for taking flyers on more bigs with our lesser picks and hoping for a lucky hit.
 
Last edited:

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Ok. Say we have the 8th pick and we have Bagley and Carter in the board. Which do you take?

It’s a tough choice for me but I think I might take Carter. There is not one weakness in that guy’s game.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,015
Location
SoCal
Ok. Say we have the 8th pick and we have Bagley and Carter in the board. Which do you take?

It’s a tough choice for me but I think I might take Carter. There is not one weakness in that guy’s game.
Bagley. Upside. Let’s not forget just how young he is. He’s not just a freshman but he reclassified up a class.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
OK. You have to choose one of these two:

Wendell Carter or Jaren Jackson Jr.

Keep in mind that Carter is bigger, stronger, rebounds better, shoots better from the 2, shoots better from the three, scores more, and gets double the assists.

Jackson gets one more block per game and shoots slightly better from the line. Carter has a 7-3 wingspan, Jackson 7-4.

I kinda sound like a Chevy commercial.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
OK. You have to choose one of these two:

Wendell Carter or Jaren Jackson Jr.

Keep in mind that Carter is bigger, stronger, rebounds better, shoots better from the 2, shoots better from the three, scores more, and gets double the assists.

Jackson gets one more block per game and shoots slightly better from the line. Carter has a 7-3 wingspan, Jackson 7-4.

I kinda sound like a Chevy commercial.


So, I've only seen each of them play a handful of times, but JJJ looks more intriguing to me. He appears to move much better, and generally just more athletic in every way. He also appears to play defense and is able to stay in front of smaller guys. His shooting is a bit strange, but in three or four games I watched, his shot was falling. That said, Carter doesn't make many mistakes. At least in the games that I watched, he appeared to be a very smart player. I'd take JJJ due to his versatility and defense.
Again, my sample is rather small- I want to say I've seen five and four games for them respectively, so my impressions could be off.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,029
Reaction score
58,329
It appears there is the growing consensus Ayton is the safe pick at #1.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

Most of us have thought this for a long time.
 

hcsilla

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Posts
3,353
Reaction score
187
Location
Budapest,Hungary
So, I've only seen each of them play a handful of times, but JJJ looks more intriguing to me. He appears to move much better, and generally just more athletic in every way. He also appears to play defense and is able to stay in front of smaller guys. His shooting is a bit strange, but in three or four games I watched, his shot was falling. That said, Carter doesn't make many mistakes. At least in the games that I watched, he appeared to be a very smart player. I'd take JJJ due to his versatility and defense.
Again, my sample is rather small- I want to say I've seen five and four games for them respectively, so my impressions could be off.

I have seen them even less, but I guess that's a correct evaluation.

Jackson seems a longer version of Chriss with more basketball IQ which sounds quite promising.

Carter's ceiling is probably lower, but he looks like a very well-rounded future pro.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
I have seen them even less, but I guess that's a correct evaluation.

Jackson seems a longer version of Chriss with more basketball IQ which sounds quite promising.


Carter's ceiling is probably lower, but he looks like a very well-rounded future pro.

Pretty much how I see it.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
I have seen them even less, but I guess that's a correct evaluation.

Jackson seems a longer version of Chriss with more basketball IQ which sounds quite promising.

Carter's ceiling is probably lower, but he looks like a very well-rounded future pro.
Also a better and more fluid 3 point shooter than Chriss IMO.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
Cross between Bender and Chriss might be a good comparison.
To me JJJ shoots his 3s more like a guard than a big man. Chriss looks pretty mechanical from three and Bender is much smoother, but still more or less looks like a big man when he shoots. Not sure it really makes much of a difference, but it's just something that I notice when I watch these guys shoot.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,367
Reaction score
12,543
Location
Tempe, AZ
Why is JJJ playing 22 mpg when he's got the best +/- in CBB?

Perhaps his +/- is the best because he's playing in limited minutes compared to other top players. I don't think his +/- should determine his playing time but only playing 22 minutes a game is enough to raise concern.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
Perhaps his +/- is the best because he's playing in limited minutes compared to other top players. I don't think his +/- should determine his playing time but only playing 22 minutes a game is enough to raise concern.
He plays so little minutes because he fouls a lot. Though he may foul a lot because they want him being very aggressive for about 22 minutes per game.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
With McDonough talking about the Miami and Milwaukee picks as trade assets, potentially to move up, it's time to consider some of the guys in the 8-12 range. My favorite is a player who at first feels like a bad fit (given that our three best player/prospects are wings) but who brings everything a winning team needs:

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2018/3/6/17082610/mikal-bridges-nba-draft-3-and-d
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
With McDonough talking about the Miami and Milwaukee picks as trade assets, potentially to move up, it's time to consider some of the guys in the 8-12 range. My favorite is a player who at first feels like a bad fit (given that our three best player/prospects are wings) but who brings everything a winning team needs:

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2018/3/6/17082610/mikal-bridges-nba-draft-3-and-d


I would be ecstatic if we ended up with him by combining the two later picks. He would be a perfect fit.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,418
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
I'm hearing a lot from other boards about how Doncic would increase our visibility overseas. Is that really a concern at this point? We've been drafting Euros for a long time, and so far, I haven't seen any advantage around the world for having Alex Len and Dragan Bender on the team.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
I'm hearing a lot from other boards about how Doncic would increase our visibility overseas. Is that really a concern at this point? We've been drafting Euros for a long time, and so far, I haven't seen any advantage around the world for having Alex Len and Dragan Bender on the team.
Len and Bender are not comparable to Doncic. Doncic is being touted as possibly the best euro prospect ever and is already a very good player in Euroleague. Neither Bender or Len can are even close to making either of those claims.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,490
Reaction score
9,704
Location
L.A. area
I'm hearing a lot from other boards about how Doncic would increase our visibility overseas. Is that really a concern at this point?

Let's hope not. The Suns' concern should be trying to bring the franchise back to credibility for its basketball product, not its pandering to small overseas markets.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,437
Reaction score
68,639
I'm hearing a lot from other boards about how Doncic would increase our visibility overseas. Is that really a concern at this point?

if it is, this FO is completely moronic.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,711
Posts
5,410,890
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top