Just hypothetically, would anyone consider Booker for Lillard and one of Portland's young power forward prospects?
2018-19 Season | Point Guard Discussion
- Thread starter Hoop Head
- Start date
Just hypothetically, would anyone consider Booker for Lillard and one of Portland's young power forward prospects?
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 117,623
- Reaction score
- 57,850
I don't think the Wizards would want another year of Anderson's contract. Maybe Ariza, Bender, Melton and the Bucks pick.
It would sell the trade better too.
devilalum
Heavily Redacted
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 16,776
- Reaction score
- 3,187
They're both shooting 34% for the season but Book takes more shots.
Their stats on the season are almost identical but Wall is 6 years older.
https://stats.nba.com/vs/#!/?PlayerID=1626164&VsPlayerID=202322
GatorAZ
feed hopkins
So you tell them if you want to save 150 mil you will take the extra year if Ryno. The contract is nearly untradeable so the Suns are in a position of power.
devilalum
Heavily Redacted
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 16,776
- Reaction score
- 3,187
You think Booker has greater value than Lillard?
Didn't realize Lillard and Wall are the same age.
https://stats.nba.com/vs/#!/?PlayerID=203081&VsPlayerID=202322
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,749
- Reaction score
- 16,502
Lillard is the better player right now. But Damian has peaked, Booker hasn't. Assuming neither has demanded a move, I wouldn't make the trade if I were Phoenix or Portland.
If the Suns somehow acquired Beal, Lillard would be a MUCH better fit with him than Booker, though Booker has the potential to be better than Lillard down the road and is much younger. From Portland's perspective, this is only if they feel they need to change things up based on the perception of the team having peaked with the Lillard/McCollum backcourt.
Under no circumstances do I want Booker to continue playing the point.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 117,623
- Reaction score
- 57,850
I'm all for getting the best trade possible. Star players seem to be getting less than peak value.
I concur with this approach and only offered up the hypothetical if for some strange reason the front office were to trade for Bradley Beal (or any other shooting guard) instead of a PG.
Two things about Wall, an unnamed Wizards player stood up for Scott Brooks and said that they love playing for him. They don't like playing with John Wall though. [Link](
Also Zach Lowe discussed the trade kicker that Wall has. If Wall is traded this season the trade kicker would end up costing the Wizards $21 million. If they wait to trade him and do so after the season and the draft this year then the trade kicker would be next to nothing since his super max kicks in and a trader kicker can't pay him more than the max amount he could earn and the super max is the maximum amount he can be paid. That's on Lowe's podcast, here is the link for that.
So while they may want to move on from Wall, it will be very expensive for them to do so this season. I know they don't have a lot of options but it's unlikely the Wizards turn things around and go on a run this year with Wall or without him unless they can do a trade like the Kawhi deal where they would get a star of sorts in return. No one will part with any sort of star for him though.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
)Also Zach Lowe discussed the trade kicker that Wall has. If Wall is traded this season the trade kicker would end up costing the Wizards $21 million. If they wait to trade him and do so after the season and the draft this year then the trade kicker would be next to nothing since his super max kicks in and a trader kicker can't pay him more than the max amount he could earn and the super max is the maximum amount he can be paid. That's on Lowe's podcast, here is the link for that.
So while they may want to move on from Wall, it will be very expensive for them to do so this season. I know they don't have a lot of options but it's unlikely the Wizards turn things around and go on a run this year with Wall or without him unless they can do a trade like the Kawhi deal where they would get a star of sorts in return. No one will part with any sort of star for him though.
elindholm
edited for content
I think Lowe is outsmarting himself. Yes, the Wizards have to pay a bigger trade kicker if they move Wall this season. But if they wait until next season, they have to take back a ton of salary in return, which will end up costing them even more. Financially speaking, the right move is to trade him now, eat the kicker, and move on.
devilalum
Heavily Redacted
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 16,776
- Reaction score
- 3,187
Or even let him get his hammy right and get him some help. If you added Beal to the current roster Booker would get much better looks and not have to handle the ball as much.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What makes you say that? The team would still be lacking a distributor and facilitator.
devilalum
Heavily Redacted
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 16,776
- Reaction score
- 3,187
Beal would alleviate some of the focus on Booker. If you buy into the motion offense concept.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Except that Kokoskov himself was recently quoted as saying that a facilitating point guard is critical to his motion offense. The team still would be bereft of those.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,749
- Reaction score
- 16,502
I didn't realize that. I heard him talking about the importance of having a point guard on the floor as a leader, I must have missed the "facilitating" part.
His words were "to make the offense go" and were in the context of facilitation.
Proximo
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2015
- Posts
- 12,695
- Reaction score
- 10,569
Yes, that is exactly the trade I would offer, if I actually wanted Wall - I don’t.
devilalum
Heavily Redacted
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 16,776
- Reaction score
- 3,187
Yeah
That’s the opposite of a really long analysis I read on some site earlier today talking about how Beal would be a perfect fit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,749
- Reaction score
- 16,502
I think you're creating that context. I took what he said to mostly mean that the PG was responsible for getting everyone on the same page. I don't mean to suggest that the PG has no facilitating responses, but you imply (or state) that his facilitating responsibility is even greater in Koko's offense than in other schemes and I have not heard anything from our coach that suggests such a thing. Quite the contrary, in fact.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,749
- Reaction score
- 16,502
I agree. My preference would be to focus on acquiring a quality power forward but IMO Beal and Booker could handle the guard duties between them quite well.
Chaplin
Better off silent
Just got this alert (and it comes from The Atlantic):
Fultz Open to Being Moved
Markelle would prefer 'fresh start with new team', is dealing with wrist issue that is impacting shooting.
Fultz Open to Being Moved
Markelle would prefer 'fresh start with new team', is dealing with wrist issue that is impacting shooting.
devilalum
Heavily Redacted
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 16,776
- Reaction score
- 3,187
devilalum
Heavily Redacted
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 16,776
- Reaction score
- 3,187
I don’t think any player on earth enjoys himself more after a dunk than Zion Williamson.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Similar threads
Staff online
-
DevilmaycareKing of Technicalities -
Chris_SandersNot Always The Best Moderator