- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 117,962
- Reaction score
- 58,208
Jarred Vanderbilt (22) would be a nice power forward target but he is a RFA.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
5/85 sounds fair to me for a top notch role player.
It's probably a fair contract but I'm not sure he can't make a huge leap going forward. His biggest drawback has to do with decision making (when to pass, when to shoot etc.) and maturity could make a big difference. I don't know that I'd want to take that gamble but at that price, the risk isn't that great.I'm so glad we didnt max Oubre out as some suggested 2 years ago. I was a fan and would have liked to have kept him for a reasonable salary and if he'd accept a bench role. As a Sixth Man I think he'd be amongst the best in the league in that role, being able to play the 2, 3, and 4. As a starter though he's not a top tier player.
I think the deal he got from Charlotte is fair. He'll probably do well in the East with a flashy PG like LaMelo feeding him. I'd be uncomfortable locking him long term for more than $12-14 million a year or though because it tanks his trade value since he's no longer young enough to hope for much improvement.
I'm so glad we didnt max Oubre out as some suggested 2 years ago. I was a fan and would have liked to have kept him for a reasonable salary and if he'd accept a bench role. As a Sixth Man I think he'd be amongst the best in the league in that role, being able to play the 2, 3, and 4. As a starter though he's not a top tier player.
I think the deal he got from Charlotte is fair. He'll probably do well in the East with a flashy PG like LaMelo feeding him. I'd be uncomfortable locking him long term for more than $12-14 million a year or though because it tanks his trade value since he's no longer young enough to hope for much improvement.
It's probably a fair contract but I'm not sure he can't make a huge leap going forward. His biggest drawback has to do with decision making (when to pass, when to shoot etc.) and maturity could make a big difference. I don't know that I'd want to take that gamble but at that price, the risk isn't that great.
I think most fans wanted a three year contract for Oubre so the Suns could retain his rights as a RFA.
A sixth man role might be ideal for Oubre although I think he can start as well. We won't know Oubre's upside until this coming season. Last season he was coming off an injury and he was trying too hard to fit into the Warriors offense.
Damn, we have a lot of Mikal homers on this board. Bottom line is if he were soooo much better than Oubre as people are opining, he would’ve supplanted Oubre in the starting line up.
I frankly don’t like Oubre at all. He quit on the team and has some personality issues. But if you believe that from a talent standpoint that Bridges is on a different tier, you’re being intellectually dishonest, especially if you think Bridges is greater than $2 mil more annually.
I hope Mikal significantly outplays Oubre for the rest of his career and exceeds my expectations.
Damn, we have a lot of Mikal homers on this board. Bottom line is if he were soooo much better than Oubre as people are opining, he would’ve supplanted Oubre in the starting line up.
I frankly don’t like Oubre at all. He quit on the team and has some personality issues. But if you believe that from a talent standpoint that Bridges is on a different tier, you’re being intellectually dishonest, especially if you think Bridges is greater than $2 mil more annually.
I hope Mikal significantly outplays Oubre for the rest of his career and exceeds my expectations.
Dennis Schroder thinks he is 25 million dollar a year player. I don't know why he thinks this. He looked abysmal against the Suns for the most part. I have watched him play. If any team is stupid enough to pay him that much good luck. That is only a few million off what we are paying Paul in the twilight of his career and Schroder is not even close to CP3 at his age.
MSN
www.msn.com
There was a point last season where 25 million was only looking like a small overpay. Things fell apart after that, in part due to the difference in the way the Lakers, the media and the league treated Lebron versus players such as Dennis.Dennis Schroder thinks he is 25 million dollar a year player. I don't know why he thinks this. He looked abysmal against the Suns for the most part. I have watched him play. If any team is stupid enough to pay him that much good luck. That is only a few million off what we are paying Paul in the twilight of his career and Schroder is not even close to CP3 at his age.
MSN
www.msn.com
I think you’re way off the market for a number of reasons:I’ll entertain an argument that Bridges is the better player (I think he can be more efficient despite averaging fewer PPG and RPG than Oubre), but to say he’s “waayyyyyy” better is hyperbole. I’m on record saying that I’d pay $15mil/year for Bridges to return; and if Kelly is worth $13 mil, I don’t think I’m being unreasonable.
There was a point last season where 25 million was only looking like a small overpay. Things fell apart after that, in part due to the difference in the way the Lakers, the media and the league treated Lebron versus players such as Dennis.
Anyway, I'd hate to be the team that was stuck with him long term as he can be a real problem child but I'm a little pissed that the Lakers got bailed out by Shroder's greed.