And he only owns 60% of the club. I've even heard 58%. He seems to be in charge and also willing to pony up cash to buy out those who wanted out but how long do the other owners go along with paying the tax? If he needs to buy out any large stakes in the team then is he as willing to pay big into the tax as well? That's a lot going out quickly and it's unlikely he'll see that return for a while So yes, hes super rich and that's great but so is Steve Balmer, so is Dan Gilbert, so is Mark Cuban. Yes, hes played collegiately but he's still a new owner. That helps level the playing field as most other competing owners have had their team for a while, decades. Is he going to be as invested in 5-10 years as he is now? Eventually it'll stop being fun if he's spending hundreds of million a year and not winning championships. Even Balmer has tightened his purse strings a bit with the new CBA. Hopefully we win and that's a moot point, as it's been for Golden State but if we don't, then what? The new CBA is very restrictive.
Things seem a bit too rosy right now and I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop. Eventually it will. Isiah Thomas isn't the only stain on Ishbia's ownership tenure. What that ends up being, who knows, and I don't want to speak anything into existence either. Things do seem a bit too good to be true though, especially coming off 2 decades of Sarver. I think we can agree there. Hopefully it pans out but part of me still is concerned for the future, a lot less post Beal trade but we'll see how that plays out.