xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
handicapping things:xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
The Raiders are bad and poorly coached, though. Since the 2008 Denver Broncos started 6-0, McDaniels is 12-31 as a head coach.handicapping things:
i think the Raiders and Vikings are most likely to rally and win enough games to be out of the top 10
the Raiders have like 7 more games vs other teams in the top 10 of the draft
the Vikings have 6 similar games, including the Bears twice and the Broncos
further -- Burrow has to get healthy at some point -- right?
@DVontel where does this put us in the franchise purgatory realm?xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
its hard to argue with thatThe Raiders are bad and poorly coached, though.
Tankathon has us at 9 and 13.
Jacobs & Renfrow are non-factors & their 20 other players are JAGs.its hard to argue with that
you look at the personnel and they ought to be better -- Josh Jacobs, Davante Adams, Hunter Renfrow, a QB that is decent -- good pass rusher. Not deep in the playoffs better, but competitive in every game and win 8 games better
lol c’mon man.^^ Big **** Brock range.
Absolutely not. Either keep the pick and pick a player during the draft. Or use it for ammunition to trade down to acquire more picks.Also...if the Cardinals draft position stayed at 9 and 13, would you trade a 1st at the deadline for Brian Burns?
Nah.Also...if the Cardinals draft position stayed at 9 and 13, would you trade a 1st at the deadline for Brian Burns?
lol c’mon man.
thats because the guys doing the mocks dont run a football teamEvery mock has him going top-10.
thats because the guys doing the mocks dont run a football team
Eh NFL teams have consistently chased the TE superstar.thats because the guys doing the mocks dont run a football team
Chiefs are the blueprint. There is a reason they have deemphasized WR, because Kelce is a true #1 option. Bowers has that kind of potential.The thing with TEs and drafting them high is that you have to commit to designing your offense around them, and work through the growing pains. If Andy Reid drafted Brock Bowers in the 8-20 range of the first round, no one would question it. Same with the Eagles. I don't know that we are the team to make him option 1B or option 2 in the passing game.
The thing with TEs and drafting them high is that you have to commit to designing your offense around them, and work through the growing pains. If Andy Reid drafted Brock Bowers in the 8-20 range of the first round, no one would question it. Same with the Eagles. I don't know that we are the team to make him option 1B or option 2 in the passing game.
Chiefs are the blueprint. There is a reason they have deemphasized WR, because Kelce is a true #1 option. Bowers has that kind of potential.
Chiefs are the blueprint. There is a reason they have deemphasized WR, because Kelce is a true #1 option. Bowers has that kind of potential.
I think if everyone had hindsight at the time, Kelce wouldn't be a 3rd rounder, but I don't disagree that drafting a TE high is pure folly.Kelce was a 3rd round pick for KC (as a 24 year old!). He played in one game his rookie season, didn't make a Pro Bowl until year 3. There is just more pressure on a top 5 or 10 pick to do something early. That's why you draft them high.
I'm not advocating drafting him.What if he isn't Kelce?
That is a luxury pick with potentially the GOAT QB and the GOAT TE.
That is not a blueprint that is a massive exception.
I am 100% against drafting a TE in round 1.