Aaron Hernandez TE / Taken into Custody / Cut by Pats

[ARZCardinals]

Wait, when did a judge convict him? If a judge says he's guilty she is either already rendering judgement on the case after both sides have presented their evidence, or should be recused from the case.

Judges don't get to willy nilly say someone is guilty. When they get that opportunity in a bench trial, they still have to hear the evidence. In this case, a JURY will decide the guilt of the piece of crap, and the judge will preside over it. Again, if she's said anything that remotely will show her as bias against the defendant, she will be recused.

But I'm guessing $ to donuts no such thing happened. Just like the wild claim of "not a shred of evidence" you are making. Wow. You are aware that Hernandez is still technically innocent, yes? We can think all we want, and all the evidence points at him like crazy, but his guilt hasn't yet been "proven." It likely will be, though.

No bail
What do you think that means?

 

[Heucrazy]

No bail
What do you think that means?

That he's a flight risk and rich so he has the means of escape.

 

[BigRedRage]

No bail
What do you think that means?

OJ had no bail and was never charged with murder.

Noone is defending hernandez, only how american law works.

 

[GuernseyCard]

You didnt get banned for saying hes guilty and noone ever said he wasnt guilty. You got banned for trolling.

All people said was wait until we know what happened, no one said he was innocent. You have reading comprehension issues.


Now its pretty obvious he was intimately involved in one way or another and is a total POS either way but you are still spewing nonsence when saying a judge found him guilty.

Evidence has been presented, he has been charged and he plead non guilty. Trial has yet to start.

'Banned for trolling', suggests that he was simply having us on. He wasn't.

 

[BigRedRage]

'Banned for trolling', suggests that he was simply having us on. He wasn't.

a person who sows discord on the Internet by trying to start arguments and upset people.[1]. They may do this by posting deliberately inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community

Calling people stupid for naming off reasons why something would happen and etc is trolling.

 

[GuernseyCard]

No bail
What do you think that means?

It simply means that the gravity of the charge and the supporting theory of the prosecution is compelling in the eyes of the court and makes the defendant a greater flight risk.

 

[GuernseyCard]

Calling people stupid for naming off reasons why something would happen and etc is trolling.

Well,I didn't see it as deliberately starting an argument; just an incredibly dim person going on and on.

 

[D-Dogg]

No bail
What do you think that means?

Wow.

What do YOU think that means?

Troll on, brother. Troll on.

 

[D-Dogg]

You, the Cards or we don't know that!

 

[D-Dogg]

Noone is defending hernandez, only how american law works.

boom goes the dynamite.

 

[TJ]

Seems I was wrong...banned 3 days for (calling) others fools

Perhaps this was the reason you were banned. It's one thing to jump to conclusions and make assumptions, it's another to ostracize others who don't agree with your statements.

Take the ban as a message - tone it down a bit.

 

[cardncubfan]

Well,I didn't see it as deliberately starting an argument; just an incredibly dim person going on and on.

 

[moosehead]

Here is an odd but (somewhat) related story

http://touch.orlandosentinel.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-76533671/

Tim Tebow tried to intervene in a bar fight between Hernandez and a bouncer when they both attended the U of F

 

[Darkside]

Tebow was thrilled with the opportunity and happy to make a difference. He'd also like to personally thank Jesus for providing the foresight to intervene.

 

[BigRedRage]

"Aaron is a great guy and a great friend of mine and a great teammate," Branch told the Georgia newspaper. "I love him to death, and it was shocking to hear his name involved in this situation. I truly hope and pray he doesn't have any dealings with it."

"That's my guy, man," Branch said. "That's my guy. It really shocked me. He was a great kid. Overall, I hope the best that he isn't involved with it and I hope he gets his name cleared, but most importantly I send my prayers and condolences out to the Lloyd family."

Sometimes its better to just shut up Mr. Branch.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...ion-branch-stands-by-aaron-hernandez/2477229/

 

[DemsMyBoys]

Tim Tebow tried to intervene in a bar fight between Hernandez and a bouncer when they both attended the U of F

Tebow went to bars?

That surprises me more than Hernandez getting in a fight or TT intervening.

 

[GuernseyCard]

Tebow went to bars?

That surprises me more than Hernandez getting in a fight or TT intervening.

Research.

 

[CardsFan88]

Oh yeah Tebow went to bars. He was known to party in Scottsdale when he came through.

He's like a politician. There's the image, and then there's reality. Though his reality is probably pretty close to the image, if his response to my friend serving him was true, the whole virgin thing was a scam.

 

[ARZCardinals]

Perhaps this was the reason you were banned. It's one thing to jump to conclusions and make assumptions, it's another to ostracize others who don't agree with your statements.

Take the ban as a message - tone it down a bit.

Trolling...no it's called RESPONSE

When someone/anyone quotes what I said and I respond...that's now trolling

Disagreeing is 1/2 this board ...good plays bad plays ...decisions.

And the judge giving no bail is a statement of agreement they believe Hernandex is guilty.


So u believe those responding to my statements shouldn't be dishes back what they serve?

 

[Darkside]

I think we should all use coherent sentences so I don't have to struggle with interpretation.

 

[GuernseyCard]

Trolling...no it's called RESPONSE

When someone/anyone quotes what I said and I respond...that's now trolling

Disagreeing is 1/2 this board ...good plays bad plays ...decisions.

And the judge giving no bail is a statement of agreement they believe Hernandex is guilty.


So u believe those responding to my statements shouldn't be dishes back what they serve?

Not allowing bail means, in law, that the court believes there is a case to be answered. Period.

 

[D-Dogg]

And the judge giving no bail is a statement of agreement they believe Hernandex is guilty.

You are ignorant of the law. And ignorance of the law is no excuse.

Go look in the mirror. Look in it. The guy you see in there, he's so freaking wrong the rest of the board can't stand it. Understand that. Take it to heart. Make it part of your very being. You are completely, totally ignorant and wrong about the basic tenets of the legal system.

Once you are done and have come to peace with your ignorance, please stop posting on anything remotely related to legal matters.

The end.

 

[ajcardfan]

Just in case you thought this was settling down and not getting weirder...

http://www.courant.com/news/connect...z-thaddeas-singleton-20130702,0,2763989.story

 

[CtCardinals78]

Just in case you thought this was settling down and not getting weirder...

http://www.courant.com/news/connect...z-thaddeas-singleton-20130702,0,2763989.story

Watching it on our 10pm news now. I remember watching the news on this accident Sunday morning. This is crazy.

 

[Mulli]

You are ignorant of the law. And ignorance of the law is no excuse.

Go look in the mirror. Look in it. The guy you see in there, he's so freaking wrong the rest of the board can't stand it. Understand that. Take it to heart. Make it part of your very being. You are completely, totally ignorant and wrong about the basic tenets of the legal system.

Once you are done and have come to peace with your ignorance, please stop posting on anything remotely related to legal matters.

The end.

Good day, sir!