- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,029
- Reaction score
- 58,329
I recall a few people thinking we'd have to lump an asset with Thomas just to be rid of him.
I don't remember this. IT was on a low salary contract and a steal for a trade.
I recall a few people thinking we'd have to lump an asset with Thomas just to be rid of him.
Except there was no way to know whether Harden would have become the player he is now had he stayed with OKC. Hindsight is 20/20 and is a convenient way to try to make yourself look smart.It's his job to know that. He's supposed to use all the data and he fact that he sees IT in person at the practice gym to see his work ethic and determine how much he can advance his game.
That's like saying OKC wasnt dumb for trading away Harden since Harden wasn't an All Star with OKC during that time.
That's not what I'm trying to do. Let me actually say that I supported trading IT. I thought that if we went back to just Dragic/Bledsoe, we could recreate or build on the success from the 48 win team with just them 2.Except there was no way to know whether Harden would have become the player he is now had he stayed with OKC. Hindsight is 20/20 and is a convenient way to try to make yourself look smart.
At the time, IT was generally a good player, but an All Star? In the West? Come on now. It would have been nice to keep him, but he was a problem at the time. His ability to be a superstar on the Suns has nothing to do with the trade itself and what he brought back for us.
I don't remember this. IT was on a low salary contract and a steal for a trade.
Someone else already bumped a thread that brought up much of what I was referring to. I agree, he was on a bargain of a contract, much of the board didn't see it that way. There were a lot of posters who, prior to the trade, thought he was the biggest problem on the roster and a cancer and that we'd be lucky to get anything for him.
People wanted him gone, board posters hardly peeped about the trade. They did not care about IT. All they cared about was the Lakers pick.
This thread proves Len should go..Ppl would rather talk about Knight than Letdown Len.
Touche
It really depends on the money, doesn't it. I would not be surprised to see Len part of a trade here at the deadline. If the Suns have decided they do not want to pay what they believe the market will be, it makes sense to move him. From another team's perspective, if they really want him, trading for him now puts them in complete control. In fact, actively shopping Len right now would be a good way of determining what the market will actually be for him. If no one is interested, we probably will be able to sign him relatively cheaply.
This is the same circumstance in which the Suns traded for Bledsoe and Knight.
We need to start Len the rest of this season whether we trade Chandler or not. And we need to just let him play through his fouls and if he fouls out, he fouls out. Of course, trading Chandler would be my first choice because that lets us get significant minutes for Williams too.
http://www.foxsports.com/nba/story/phoenix-suns-the-alex-len-dilemma-021617
Interesting read on Len...My original take on Len is still intact. Despite his flashes the only one on the team with a worse plus/minus is Brandon Knight. That plus Lens style of game is not in vogue in today's NBA...He's a dinosaur.
I can't help but think the Suns have already made up their mind about Len unless the Suns are thinking about trading Chandler. If Len can't beat out Chandler at this stage of his career he is likely on the way out. I'm not say the Suns wouldn't resign Len on the cheap but this is unlikely to happen.
I think they are being patient.
However, what kind of message does that send to Len if another team paints a more rosy picture for his future?
He is restricted. The only way another team is getting Len is to offer him significantly more than the Suns think he is worth.
Len has to beat out Chandler. He has the potential to do so. But his foul rate and mental lapses have kept him from it.
Len just doesn't give enough consistency in multiple areas for my tastes...This is his fourth year and he's had his chance. I don't want us to settle on him unless he's dirt cheap and even then I'm not totally happy about it because I dont want us locked in years with him.
The last thing you want to do is give up too early on a 23 year old because of "inconsistency". I say we wait it out and see what the market sets for him and if it is a number that the Suns feel is worth the gamble of matching, than do it.That's a very common complaint about most players when a critical eye is applied. Most of Len's inconsistency comes from foul problems, solve that and you have an above average center IMO.
That's a very common complaint about most players when a critical eye is applied. Most of Len's inconsistency comes from foul problems, solve that and you have an above average center IMO.
Len is always a riddle that needs to be solved. Maybe he fouls because his reflexes are slower than average or his basketball IQ is lower. How does that get fixed?
The last thing you want to do is give up too early on a 23 year old because of "inconsistency". I say we wait it out and see what the market sets for him and if it is a number that the Suns feel is worth the gamble of matching, than do it.