His offensive system looked quite good last night except the players were wearing blue.
Miller needs to recruit better offensive players. The McConnell teams were defensive monsters but didn't have any great shooters. This team had shoddy PG play. It's the jimmy and joe's not x's and o's.
While I agree with that, who had the better talent last night Miller or Mack? That game was won by coaching. Miller had the jimmy and joes.
Millers' kryptonite seems to be zone defenses, I think part of that is he doesn't play zone so UA doesn't practice much against zones and when they see a good zone, they often struggle. His "gimmick" against zones is to screen the zone, which can be effective but Xavier was playing a semi matchup zone and screening was far less effective than normal.
I agree with the idea if he keeps at his current level he's going to eventually crack through and get to the FF, I'm not sure he'll win an NC without improving the offense though. I agree with the idea defenses don't go into slumps offenses do, but virtually every year there's going to be a game where you just have to make
Man do I disagree with your assessment. Those two teams were NOT running the same offensive system down the stretch. Go back and watch it. Xavier was clearly running a very effective weave resulting time and again in point blank shots or open 3s. Arizona players were all stationary. It wasn't just Trier. No one moved off the ball. You can't tell me they were all just disregarding the offense. It WAS the offense. Pass it around the perimeter and then one person try to make a play at the or the shot clock. That was NOT the same offense.
agreed all that cutting off the high post stuff that's not what Miller runs at all.
I agree with Mao the absence of a really good PG is a problem but the main issue was IMO lack of ball movement.
Terrific defensive coach, but it just seems like his coaching philosophy is be tougher than the other team and sometimes that's not enough.