Arizona Cardinals GM Steve Keim cited for DUI on July 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
Ok, I'm curious about this... Is the reason most people would be fired is because of the jail time? If one has to spend X number of days in jail they obviously can't do their job. Depending on their position this could have quite an impact on the business.

There's other types of crimes that can be committed with a result of a fine and/or community service that don't result in a loss of job. So what is it about a DUI specifically that requires or results termination?

I get speeding or driving tickets with CDL since those can have a direct impact on your job function, but i've always been curious with DUIs
There are jobs within the department that might require one to drive. Trips, perimeter patrol, etc. not to mention being able to get to work. Also, being a part of the law enforcement community you're expected to not only uphold the law but to follow it as well.

But I have a question:

What's worse: Drinking 2 beers to the point where you have a BAC of .08 or slightly higher or, say, getting caught doing 50 in a 35? Or 75 in a 65?
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
Same with excessive speeding, or any distracted driving. I guess it is great to live in such a black and white world, where in your mind everyone that isn't perfect is either executed or unemployed.
So in your eyes no one should be disciplined for breaking the law? There should be no standards? Keim works in a league where players are disciplined, harshly, for the same offense so shouldn't he be held to the same standard?
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
81,968
Reaction score
41,733
Location
South Scottsdale
So in your eyes no one should be disciplined for breaking the law? There should be no standards? Keim works in a league where players are disciplined, harshly, for the same offense so shouldn't he be held to the same standard?


Did I say that? No
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
34,977
Reaction score
21,080
Location
South Bay
It’s more the basic stuff that grinds my gears. People not realizing they can go right on a red. People that think it’s okay to go left in an intersection 2-3 seconds after yellow turns red. Generally people that don’t understand how to merge and cut across 3 lanes at once. I don’t have road rage but I can understand how people lose it.
I’ll take those struggles any day over sitting in the 405 for an hour only to go 10 miles. That’s the poo that gives people road rage here. Honestly, I miss driving in AZ.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,526
Reaction score
57,862
Location
SoCal
Well, my understanding is that you are an attorney so as a common citizen I cannot argue law with you. But isn't this somewhat like the Kap case where he is free to express his personal opinion based on 1st amendment rights, yet he does it while he is being paid by his employer to be part of the "team"? He could do whatever he wanted in private life but not while being paid by his employer and their right to action. I won't even mention "court of public opinion" as you know where that will end up. I am just saying there have been falsehoods about the case already and I will base my decision after all the facts are presented and he has had his day in court. I personally don't know enough facts to determine guilt, and even then, that is not my decision.
Yes nfl teams have a right to cut kap or not hire him. And that’s what’s happening. Soooo I’m not sure I get your point. However, if they’re colluding to keep him out of the league that may encroach on his legal rights. You can base your decision on the legalities, but the constitution and the court system has zero bearing on anyone else expressing their thoughts on this matter.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,526
Reaction score
57,862
Location
SoCal
I think that is what he is apologizing for too. He put the team, the league, and himself in a bad situation, I don't think by apologizing he was admitting guilt.
Uh if he didn’t do anything wrong how could he place the team, the league, and himself in a bad situation. That was 100% an admission of guilt. Your logic doesn’t hold.
 

Sandan

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
24,687
Reaction score
2,158
Location
Plymouth, UK
Apparently Keim refused to take all field sobriety tests, told cops he was the head of security for the cards, then had his blood drawn back at the station....said he had 2 beers while eating a pizza over 1-2 hours...hmmm doubt that stevie
I would NEVER agree to a field sobriety test and I am pretty adamant about how bad DUI is

Breath or blood test fine, some cops subjective opinion NO WAY IN HELL if I can avoid it
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,357
Reaction score
68,429
Uh if he didn’t do anything wrong how could he place the team, the league, and himself in a bad situation. That was 100% an admission of guilt. Your logic doesn’t hold.

if I was a betting man, all of the people here defending Keim were probably calling us non-fans when we bashed Rod Graves and his "belly of the beast" Free Agency flop of 2003. Disappointing but not surprising, especially considering how many people here defended Washington for domestic abuse also. Seems like if you bleed Cardinals red, you can make others actually do the same (or at least put others in danger of bleeding) with impunity.

Being apologists for domestic abusers or two-time DUI douches is ugly tribalism.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
15,951
Reaction score
7,737
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
Uh if he didn’t do anything wrong how could he place the team, the league, and himself in a bad situation. That was 100% an admission of guilt. Your logic doesn’t hold.


He drank,he drove, he got arrested. We'll see if he is convicted. then we'll see what or what doesn't "hold". That's how, I've been arrested for DUI, guess what I don't drink. They got me to the station and I blew zeros. So forgive me if I don't follow your jump to the assumption that he is guilty routine. It happens.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
15,951
Reaction score
7,737
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
if I was a betting man, all of the people here defending Keim were probably calling us non-fans when we bashed Rod Graves and his "belly of the beast" Free Agency flop of 2003. Disappointing but not surprising, especially considering how many people here defended Washington for domestic abuse also. Seems like if you bleed Cardinals red, you can make others actually do the same (or at least put others in danger of bleeding) with impunity.

Being apologists for domestic abusers or two-time DUI douches is ugly tribalism.

I hope I'm not included in this. I am just not convicting the dude until all the facts are out. Was he drinking and driving absolutely he was, but was he drunk driving...I don't know. So until he is convicted I say he is not a two-time DUI dude. I'm sure you've had your moments when you should not have been behind the wheel. I know I have and I have pretty much been a nondrinker for close to 30 years. I probably have 3 or 4 drinks a year.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,123
Reaction score
8,014
Location
Scottsdale
I hope I'm not included in this. I am just not convicting the dude until all the facts are out. Was he drinking and driving absolutely he was, but was he drunk driving...I don't know. So until he is convicted I say he is not a two-time DUI dude. I'm sure you've had your moments when you should not have been behind the wheel. I know I have and I have pretty much been a nondrinker for close to 30 years. I probably have 3 or 4 drinks a year.

You're missing the point... While technically, it could matter whether or not he is actually convicted, the reality is that he 100% put a very BAD face on his employer. He 100% made a very STUPID decision, regardless of a conviction or not. His position comes with immense responsibility. Hell, in his role, he is often charged with being a key decision-make regarding punishment for players who run into trouble with the law, or otherwise make decisions that place the team in an unfavorable light.
He compromised his ability to play that role. And he compromised the image of the team... And if he is proven to be guilty and then convicted, the team should deal with him in the harshest way possible. Not fire him. But a massive fine and leave without pay at minimum...
 

Willie D

Veteran
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Posts
410
Reaction score
135
Location
Scottsdale
The number of times one is caught also doesn’t multiply the danger of each individual act.
You're wrong. It does. DUI convictions carry probation (unsupervised). If you cop another one, you are deemed a repeat offender, and you will be bumped up to the next phase of penalties.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
15,951
Reaction score
7,737
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
You're missing the point... While technically, it could matter whether or not he is actually convicted, the reality is that he 100% put a very BAD face on his employer. He 100% made a very STUPID decision, regardless of a conviction or not. His position comes with immense responsibility. Hell, in his role, he is often charged with being a key decision-make regarding punishment for players who run into trouble with the law, or otherwise make decisions that place the team in an unfavorable light.
He compromised his ability to play that role. And he compromised the image of the team... And if he is proven to be guilty and then convicted, the team should deal with him in the harshest way possible. Not fire him. But a massive fine and leave without pay at minimum...

I agree with you 100%. This got started because I said him apologizing IMO was not necessarily an admission of guilt. It could be that he was apologizing for exactly what you just wrote although you put it much better than I did.
 

JerkFace

(Formerly offset) i have a special purpose
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
3,751
Reaction score
2,340
Location
Surprise
if I was a betting man, all of the people here defending Keim were probably calling us non-fans when we bashed Rod Graves and his "belly of the beast" Free Agency flop of 2003. Disappointing but not surprising, especially considering how many people here defended Washington for domestic abuse also. Seems like if you bleed Cardinals red, you can make others actually do the same (or at least put others in danger of bleeding) with impunity.

Being apologists for domestic abusers or two-time DUI douches is ugly tribalism.
I somewhat agree with this but I also will state that most of the people calling for Keim to be fired were not a Keim fans before the incident. It seems like peoples view of Keim before this incident drives how people view the incident (on both sides).
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Did threads get merged? Did I miss something?

For all of the vitriol here, Keim was barely doing anything wrong, was cooperative and pleasant, and didn't pound his fist or demand he be treated special. A LOT of stones thrown in glass houses here, again - unless I walked into a merged thread, since I knew this was locked today at some point before I got home.
 

Kel Varnsen

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Posts
33,369
Reaction score
11,994
Location
Phoenix
Exactly. Where's the outrage over speeding? Excess speed is the leading cause of automobile deaths and people consciously speed everyday. I'm sure all the people clamoring for Keim's job have never gone above the speed limit or been cited for speeding.

How about this fool? He’s in the Arizona House of Representatives.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,357
Reaction score
68,429
I somewhat agree with this but I also will state that most of the people calling for Keim to be fired were not a Keim fans before the incident. It seems like peoples view of Keim before this incident drives how people view the incident (on both sides).

really? I know Ouchie and I were big fans in the heyday, questioned him during a couple questionable years then went gaga over him when he pulled off the The Rosen One. Can't speak for others on that though.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,357
Reaction score
68,429
Did threads get merged? Did I miss something?

For all of the vitriol here, Keim was barely doing anything wrong, was cooperative and pleasant, and didn't pound his fist or demand he be treated special. A LOT of stones thrown in glass houses here, again - unless I walked into a merged thread, since I knew this was locked today at some point before I got home.

My vitriol didn't start until I heard about the first DUI conviction. Until then, all I was saying was this was a bad look. But the second I heard this wasn't his first offense, you're damn right I started in on him and for good reason. You get one of those and DON'T change your behavior and put yourself and other's lives at risk and you're a piece of crap who only cares about yourself as far as I'm concerned... and apparently don't care much about yourself either. And you sure as hell can't be a leader of men after two of those, IMO. At least not until you get your crap together.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,357
Reaction score
68,429
Because legally it's one of the stupidest things you can do?

Blowing a .081 will solidify DUI, but getting your blood tested at .079 is legally defensible. Simple as that.

and wouldn't take the field sobriety test?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top