And to add the cherry on top, everyone knows that the Bengals had a awful OLine, yet, the Bengals still traded Billy Price cause he wasn’t worthy enough to start on THAT OLine.
Because every player that hasn't been real good their first 3-4 years always sucks no matter what...
Are those the only two options?
Well, we all know one of these guys got traded from a team had an atrocious OLine and the team that received him didn’t bother to resign him despite them having an awful OLine as well.
I would think not making the Colts’ OLine & Falcons’ OLine from a few years ago is a little different than bait being cut from the Bengals and Giants OLine.
Yeah right! And an 80 to 1 long shot will win the Kentucky Derby!
Kyler sitting next to Pugh instead of Ertz is a clear indication his pass-catchers dont like him much.
His PFF grade was 62. Not terrible.
Shouldn't he be watching game film?
What does his draft status have to do with anything? It’s evident he didn’t live up anywhere close to that.
I don't see the point to reply to all the messages of posters having a different opinion, u like those additions, fine, but in a area where i hoped to get a significant upgrade i can say im disappointed about the recent moves and understand the concern of other users, rely on two later round additions or underachiever players is not the recipe for success
Solder was a solid starter on Patriots' O line. I wonder what happened.
Almost every former patriots linemen failed in other environments
Bet the Patriots Oline coach has some secret sauces. Hope Kugler does too.
Tom Brady was the key
I won’t even say “every bad move.” I’d say they defend literally every move. I can’t recall a single move they consider bad. At least darksiders occasionally say a signing is good or may be good. But honestly, what move over the past two years have Brit or krang disliked?
<Sigh>
