AZ vs TEN MNF Game Thread

clif

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Posts
8,967
Reaction score
214
Location
Phoenix, az
swd you are killing me tonight. :biglaugh: if only it weren't true. If I was a fan in the stands I would ask for a refund. This is complete bullsh**. I actually almost felt bad for ESPN... wasting all that good film and slow motion technology on showing us how bad we stink.
 

clif

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Posts
8,967
Reaction score
214
Location
Phoenix, az
I mean seriously, how many more veteran days off are we going to give? Was tonight one of them? How many more practices is Whiz going to call off 30 minutes early? When is the next movie day? This is damn atrocious. I swear.. whatever we do... we got to be the worst at it. Not a single person looked good tonight. Never in my life have I seen a team look so effin out of sync and disinterested.
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,866
Reaction score
1,674
It's like people forget what every preseason has been like under Wiz.
 

clif

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Posts
8,967
Reaction score
214
Location
Phoenix, az
Yeah, you would think somebody would do something on national tv. Show some kind of pride. Unless they like getting their head smashed in.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,480
Reaction score
40,104
Location
Las Vegas
Yeah, you would think somebody would do something on national tv. Show some kind of pride. Unless they like getting their head smashed in.

Kenny iwebema, Stephen Williams, max hall, Stevie bags and a few flashes from Washington again. A few showed up. ;)
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,274
Reaction score
12,317
Location
York, PA
Yeah, you would think somebody would do something on national tv. Show some kind of pride. Unless they like getting their head smashed in.

When you avoid blocking & tackling, you tend to avoid having your head smashed in. I'll be concerned when we look like that in a meaningful game. Until then, I don't give a rats a$$. I saw too many Cardinal teams go 4-0 in the preseason, only to go 4-12 when it counts. The Colts haven't won like 1 preseason game in the last 5 years. So what.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,480
Reaction score
40,104
Location
Las Vegas
When you avoid blocking & tackling, you tend to avoid having your head smashed in. I'll be concerned when we look like that in a meaningful game. Until then, I don't give a rats a$$. I saw too many Cardinal teams go 4-0 in the preseason, only to go 4-12 when it counts. The Colts haven't won like 1 preseason game in the last 5 years. So what.

Exactly. When we look like that week 1 vs the rams I'll worry!
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,436
Reaction score
59,999
The Cardinals should keep Leinart to appease the fans who think he should be the Cardinals starting QB. Maybe the light will finally come on but I don't think so. Also he has been in study just for this occasion. Let's give it a go.

DA is terrible. I'd rather take my chances with rookie QBs. The Cardinals will not be missing much losing DA. Then keep Hall and Skelton for the second and third QBs rather than let some other team pick one of them up off the PUP squad. One might be the Cardinals QBs of the future. I'm betting on Skelton.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Kenny iwebema, Stephen Williams, max hall, Stevie bags and a few flashes from Washington again. A few showed up. ;)

How do the stat people at nfl.com credit tackles? Iwebema looked like he was all over the place but is credited with only one tackle.

Calais had a good game. But overall nothing noteworthy from anybody and none of the young guys did anything to pressure the vet in front of them.

About the only thing I saw tonight was that Robinson just isn't the answer at NT and if he starts its going to be a long season for our defense.
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,866
Reaction score
1,674
Yeah, you would think somebody would do something on national tv. Show some kind of pride. Unless they like getting their head smashed in.

You mean like the pride they showed last year on the MNF opener against the team that beat them in the Super Bowl?

The coaching staff obviously doesn't want the same things out of pre-season as others seem to and they've been pretty successful once the games matter, so I'll trust their judgement.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
You mean like the pride they showed last year on the MNF opener against the team that beat them in the Super Bowl?

The coaching staff obviously doesn't want the same things out of pre-season as others seem to and they've been pretty successful once the games matter, so I'll trust their judgement.

So are you saying the coaches tell their players not to run too fast or hit too hard or do anything more than give a halfhearted shove at a pass rusher or go out of their way to catch the football?

On the other hand I did see some plays that were head scratchers where Titan defenders simply were not blocked. Nobody missed a block there just wasn't a Cardinal player in position to block them. Now those would be a sign that the Cards are playing it close to the vest.

BTW: the game vs the Steelers last season was on a Thursday and the Cards lost 20-10.
 
Last edited:

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,866
Reaction score
1,674
So are you saying the coaches tell their players not to run too fast or hit too hard or do anything more than give a halfhearted shove at a pass rusher or go out of their way to catch the football?

I'm saying that the NFL more than any other sport relies on coaching and game planning. How fired up are the players going to be knowing the coaching staff is going to be so bland and not trying to win?

The 1st team offense against the Steelers looked even worse than it did tonight(down it's best offensive player) and I'm pretty sure the MNF crew called the game, but maybe I'm mistaken.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I'm saying that the NFL more than any other sport relies on coaching and game planning. How fired up are the players going to be knowing the coaching staff is going to be so bland and not trying to win?

The 1st team offense against the Steelers looked even worse than it did tonight(down it's best offensive player) and I'm pretty sure the MNF crew called the game, but maybe I'm mistaken.

OK I see what you are saying but the Steelers game from last pre season is a poor comparison.

The first team offense with Warner had 6 first downs and gained 65 yards and converted on three 3rd down plays in a drive and a half. Nowhere near as bad as tonight's performance.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Toast has a ton to prove... not necessarily tonight, but at some point he has to show he belongs as a starter in this league. The entire pro football community (players, coaches, "experts" and fans) all have a very dark perception of the kid.
Wow!

82Cards you have said it as about as good as it can be said. Matt has a bad perception all around among experts, players, coaches and fans. Where it all comes from his performance or lack of or of the playboy image he created I do not know. I am among those who are concerned more than just a little. If he cannot perform then the entire team and season is in jeopardy. It is up to Matt to change all this and will be the only way to shut up all us doubters. Getting all those millions up front can change some young guys perceptions of what they really want to do in life. To be a NFL starting QB you have to be smart, tough, and totally committed.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
It's driving me insane.

And Matt's lack of anticipation is also driving me crazy. Holding the ball a second longer, or letting it go a second earlier are intangibles that cannot be taught. And Matt Leinart does not posses those qualities.

In college Matt had one of the best offensive lines in college and had future pro RB's. Maybe he will never be ready for the speed of the NFL rushes. Warner was one of the best ever at getting rid of the ball and stopping the blitz. Matt does not see what Kurt could see when he lined up. Maybe he never will or maybe by some miracle a light will come on. Archie Manning played for years on one of the worst teams in the NFL but was always considered one of the best QB's in the NFL. Let is face the fact that Warner was the heart and soul of this team. It is going to be a long year. We will see several QB's starting from time to time.
 

JC_AZ

JC_AZ
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Posts
1,593
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa
The Cardinals should keep Leinart to appease the fans who think he should be the Cardinals starting QB. Maybe the light will finally come on but I don't think so. Also he has been in study just for this occasion. Let's give it a go.

DA is terrible. I'd rather take my chances with rookie QBs. The Cardinals will not be missing much losing DA. Then keep Hall and Skelton for the second and third QBs rather than let some other team pick one of them up off the PUP squad. One might be the Cardinals QBs of the future. I'm betting on Skelton.

Since it is impossible to tell at this point what Skelton and Hall can do against the "1's", it may be premature, however, the potential and composure shown by both seems worth considering...DA has had more opportunity in the first two games than any of them and I believe he is demonstrating why he was dumped from Cleveland and lost out to who? Seriously, start with ML and if the O really continues to suck we have two compettitors who can vie for number 2... DA has a great arm, but so did Jeff George...use his salary to sign DD and develop the other two guys with actual potential and COMPETITIVENESS... JMHO of course
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,304
Reaction score
1,181
Location
SE Valley
Matt has a bad perception all around among experts, players, coaches and fans. Where it all comes from his performance or lack of or of the playboy image he created I do not know.
I'll grant that Leinart was more than a little responsible for the "playboy" image from USC and early in his pro career. But it has been three years since the beer bong and hot tub days. It's time to let it go.

Maybe this will help: http://www.azcardinals.com/photos-v...herhood-/76c0dd7e-e2b5-44b9-8ec6-38ed2ec898fe
 
Last edited:

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,284
Reaction score
8,312
Location
Scottsdale
I'll grant that Leinart was more than a little responsible for the "playboy" image from USC and early in his pro career. But it has been three years since the beer bong and hot tub days. It's time to let it go.

Maybe this will help: http://www.azcardinals.com/photos-v...herhood-/76c0dd7e-e2b5-44b9-8ec6-38ed2ec898fe


That story won't help at all... The ONLY thing that will improve his image around the league is what he does ON the field, not off. The reality is that perception often becomes reality. Matt - nobody else but Matt, created a very bad perception of himself. Now, the only way to remove that stain is to demonstrate that he can consistently perform in the NFL. Right now, his ineptitude on the field is only feeding into the perception he helped to create.
Trying to strike the balance between football and being a father is admirable. And if he can become an effective NFL QB, his desire to be a solid dad will only help the perception. However, if all he ever becomes known for is a guy who attempted to strike the balance between football and fatherhood, while falling short of his on-the-field promise, his soft, playboy reputation will be cemented...
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,304
Reaction score
1,181
Location
SE Valley
82, my post wasn't addressed to "around the league"; my post was addressed to Cardinal fans whom ought to be more in the know than to hang on to perceptions about a guy based upon his college days and shortly thereafter.

God knows, none of us did things in our early twenties that we wouldn't do now! :sarcasm:

In your words, if Leinart fails his playboy reputation will be cemented. Shouldn't it be,if he fails in the NFL, that his reputation will be that he never made the transition on the field from great college QB to good NFL QB?

Because from what I am seeing he has already made the transition in his personal life.

If what Leinart is ultimately going to be judged upon is his on field performance, why do people consistently dredge up three year old off-field items to criticize him?
 

DemsMyBoys

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Posts
12,375
Reaction score
4,656
Location
Cave Creek
A beam of light just fell on me and I've decided how I'm going to judge Matt: If he shows up as a waiter at Fitz's Celebrity Servers Night next Monday at Morton's. If Matt is there he is a team player. His relationship with Fitz is Perfect. He is a family man who gives his time to charity. Yup. I've decided it. Next Monday night I will know everything I need to know about Matt Leinart as a man, as a father, and as a teammate. And as a waiter. If he doesn't show up I'll be shaking my head and mumbling about SC and hot tubs. Again.
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
Matt's been acknowledged to have put his younger ways behind him, for at least two years now.

That's not the problem, if he has a problem, that's not it.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,284
Reaction score
8,312
Location
Scottsdale
If what Leinart is ultimately going to be judged upon is his on field performance, why do people consistently dredge up three year old off-field items to criticize him?

Judged by those who are commenting on his perception at this moment in time... I have no doubt that those who aren't commenting already know the true, non-Football Matt.

And, people dredge up the "three year old, off the field items" because Matt hasn't done anything on the field to change their perception...
 

desertrat218

Veteran
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Posts
278
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
I can't see Matt Leinart ever emerging as a legitimate NFL QB. He seems to be very indecisive and dumps the ball off to backs much too quickly without even attempting to throw the ball downfield. Max Hall has shown some potential and so has Skelton. Derek Anderson may be the best option early on as the Cards groom one of the rookies for the future.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,048
Reaction score
1,168
Location
In The End Zone
Everyone is turning into a bunch of postal workers in here. Stay way from weapons, people.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,544
Posts
5,436,614
Members
6,330
Latest member
Trainwreck20
Top