Faulk sucks now, we don't want your over the hill trash.
So, I guess you didn't read the original post then? A troglodyte such as yourself can't help but sink to insults and the equivelant of grunts and groans to express your opinion since you don't have anything valid to add to the conversation.
Please, tell me why Faulk would be a bad thing if he was brought in as a third down specialist, depth and veteran leadership? I guarantee you that he still catches the ball out of the backfield better than anything the Cardinals have as well as most rb's throughout the league. On top of that, I would bet my bottom dollar that he would have 5+ td's in the red zone this year under the same circumstances that JJ and Shipp got...2 was it? This system was built for him for heaven's sake.
Yeah, it's just crazy talk to want to improve the backfield.
Hell, if you really want something to be pissed about, I wouldn't mind seeing the Card's pick up Az Hakim to stretch the field and create mismatchs. Even after his hip and leg injuries he's still a great slot receiver and he's a stud in this type of offense. Just because these guys are ex-Rams doesn't mean that they couldn't come in and improve the cohesion of the offense, especially when it would be with a qb that they're familiar with.
Actually, if Bruce is available(Rams still haven't committed to re-signing, restructuring and they're likely not going to pay the huge roster increase he's getting this year) I would take him over Hakim and move Anquan to the slot and use him as a Shannon Sharpe type of wr/te. But, I've got a sneaking suspicion they won't be calling me any time soon for advice. I say Bruce because there wouldn't be a learning curve, like there wouldn't be with Faulk or Hakim. It's not that I want to see Rams come to Arizona, just guys that won't slow down the cohesion.