Do not stand to the left of the agent if you see them together.Time for Rackers to give his agent the boot. I liked Rackers.
Do not stand to the left of the agent if you see them together.Time for Rackers to give his agent the boot. I liked Rackers.
In hind sight, we should have went with Nugent but I think what he was saying is that Whiz trusted Rackers to be honest about his injury. Rackers broke that trust and now he's been punted down the road. I don't think this is the only factor but just the straw that broke the camel's back.
I disagree. More than likely, Whis was relying on physician updates to determine where Rackers was physically. I believe Rackers was not upfront about how bad the injury was. Remember, last season was his contract year. Im sure he did all he could do to get back out on the field to show he was worth a raise.
Why am I not surprised that Rackers was less than a straight shooter?
Rackers is an easy target. One would be amiss not to partake.You're on fire today. Keep them coming!
Why am I not surprised that Rackers was less than a straight shooter?
Why am I not surprised that Rackers was less than a straight shooter?
Did you know Rackers is a Democrat?
Anyone who has seen Rackers play knows he's a far-left kinda guy.
You are fooling yourself.It has been well reported locally that the Cardinals made every effort to sign Rackers but he wasn't taking the deal they offered.
It has nothing to do with Whiz's trust, Whiz wanted him here. They gave Rackers a cut off time to sign and he didn't take it. Feely was nothing more than the second choice for this team.
Anyone who thinks he is an upgrade is fooling themselves. Hard to blame the team though when the player won't cooperate.
Looks like Rackers and his agent did in fact overplay their hand. They played chicken and lost.
http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/KentSomers/77411
You are fooling yourself.
Good for you. Rackers is a dime a dozen.The Cardinals front office and the coaching staff disagrees. I will side with them.
You are fooling yourself.
The Cardinals made re-signing kicker Neil Rackers a priority, offering him a contract on the first day of free agency.
You missed my joke.Again, a direct refute of any nonsense or supposition about "losing the coaches confidence".
The Cardinals wanted Rackers back and that is a fact.
They weren't going to pay him more than $2 million though.
Well, okay. That is a good point.Well they waited over a month if they put the offer in on the first day of free agency. I think the Cardinals were more concerned about getting stuck with noodle leg Nugent.