Cards strike out at QB

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
Thank you. I thought I was the only person who thinks that it isn't a guarantee that Palmer is leaving next year.

If Palmer doesn't have a major injury this year and we win 10 or more games I fully expect him to play at least in 2018. He loves the game, the prep, the grind and his teammates so much and only when his body doesn't heal up at the end of a season will he hang them up.
 
OP
OP
az jam

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,989
Reaction score
5,215
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Man, I cannot WAIT until the people that keeps throwing out the same ole redundant "This QB class was weak, next years is much stronger" statement use the same exact excuse next year around this time.

Thank you. That is exactly the point I wanted to make when I posted this thread. We are not developing a qb to take Palmers place. BASK and many on this board are making excuses while other teams are picking qbs in the draft to take the place of their starters. Ten qbs were taken in this years draft. None by the Cardinals.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,059
Reaction score
23,256
Last year, did anyone ever describe this year's QB class as strong?
Yes. Watson, Kaaya, & Kizer were heralded as top 15 picks.

So far, Darnold, Josh Allen, & Lamar Jackson are pretty much in the same line for next year. Scouts will get much more time to pick them apart like they do every year while 2 of the 3 will probably regress. Then, when the draft comes roaming around, people will throw the same ole tired a** statement about "This QB class is weak, let's wait until next year."
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,614
Reaction score
58,062
Location
SoCal
Yes. Watson, Kaaya, & Kizer were heralded as top 15 picks.

So far, Darnold, Josh Allen, & Lamar Jackson are pretty much in the same line for next year. Scouts will get much more time to pick them apart like they do every year while 2 of the 3 will probably regress. Then, when the draft comes roaming around, people will throw the same ole tired a** statement about "This QB class is weak, let's wait until next year."
I don't think Lamar Jackson will be that highly touted unless his mechanics improve measurably.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,014
Reaction score
21,149
Location
South Bay
Man, I cannot WAIT until the people that keeps throwing out the same ole redundant "This QB class was weak, next years is much stronger" statement use the same exact excuse next year around this time.

Next years class has three QBs who should be Top 10 picks and are legit Top 10 picks, not overvalued mid-tier guys pushed up due to low supply/high demand.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
I like the draft but am very disappointing that the Cards did not draft a qb. They could have had Kizer in the 2nd, Davis Webb in the 3rd, Dobbs in the 4th or Peterman in the 5th. All the talk to have a qb sit behind and learn from Palmer was BS. It's all or nothing for the 2017 season. We will be scrambling again when Palmer retires.
Cards prefer rent-A-geezer.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,059
Reaction score
23,256
Next years class has three QBs who should be Top 10 picks and are legit Top 10 picks, not overvalued mid-tier guys pushed up due to low supply/high demand.
Name them please & how are you sure?
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
Next years class has three QBs who should be Top 10 picks and are legit Top 10 picks, not overvalued mid-tier guys pushed up due to low supply/high demand.
So the only way we get them is if we suck.

We sucked last season and had a chance for Watson, but too shy to move up.
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
12,996
Reaction score
8,092
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
Yes. Watson, Kaaya, & Kizer were heralded as top 15 picks.

So far, Darnold, Josh Allen, & Lamar Jackson are pretty much in the same line for next year. Scouts will get much more time to pick them apart like they do every year while 2 of the 3 will probably regress. Then, when the draft comes roaming around, people will throw the same ole tired a** statement about "This QB class is weak, let's wait until next year."
Jackson might not end up at QB at the next level... and Josh Rosen is currently considered the second best prospect behind Darnold.. but you are right a lot can change in a year.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,059
Reaction score
23,256
Jackson might not end up at QB at the next level... and Josh Rosen is currently considered the second best prospect behind Darnold.. but you are right a lot can change in a year.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I didn't name Rosen because he was horrible before he sat out the rest of the season due to injury, but I'll cut him a little bit of slack due to changing OCs before last season.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,281
Reaction score
6,230
Location
Dallas, TX
Thank you. That is exactly the point I wanted to make when I posted this thread. We are not developing a qb to take Palmers place. BASK and many on this board are making excuses while other teams are picking qbs in the draft to take the place of their starters. Ten qbs were taken in this years draft. None by the Cardinals.
Again, you DONT DRAFT a QB just for the sake of drafting one!!!

The 2 guys they obviously liked went off the board early because of trades & Keim didn't want to give up all that draft capital & sacrificing players that can help them win this year. This isn't a 5-11 football team & it has enough talent to compete for the SB if they don't choke away games like in 2016.

They made moves to acquire some of these draft picks & if they would've had enough faith or belief in Kizer, Webb, etc they would've made that move. They didn't so onto 2017
 

Hollywood

is part black.
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Posts
8,247
Reaction score
1,015
Location
Mesa, Arizona, USA, Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Thank you. That is exactly the point I wanted to make when I posted this thread. We are not developing a qb to take Palmers place. BASK and many on this board are making excuses while other teams are picking qbs in the draft to take the place of their starters. Ten qbs were taken in this years draft. None by the Cardinals.
Ok, lets look at the 10 teams that are "developing" qb's to take the place of their starters.

KC is, imo, the only team that is actually grooming their pick to take over for their starter. While smith isn't a bad qb he obviously isn't going to with them a title.

the steelers have ben playing at least another year and probably longer didn't draft a qb until the 4th round. The lions with the only other established qb isn't replacing him any time soon and definately not with brad kaaya.

That leaves the niners, broncos, browns, bills, bears, texans and giants...all of which desperately need a starting qb this year and are forced to stake their future on this years class. We don't need to do that so we didn't. None of the qb's that were available at 13 were worth that pick and none in this class were worth what it would have taken to move up to get them.

There is a time and a place for everything.
 

Hollywood

is part black.
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Posts
8,247
Reaction score
1,015
Location
Mesa, Arizona, USA, Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Again, you DONT DRAFT a QB just for the sake of drafting one!!!

The 2 guys they obviously liked went off the board early because of trades & Keim didn't want to give up all that draft capital & sacrificing players that can help them win this year. This isn't a 5-11 football team & it has enough talent to compete for the SB if they don't choke away games like in 2016.

They made moves to acquire some of these draft picks & if they would've had enough faith or belief in Kizer, Webb, etc they would've made that move. They didn't so onto 2017
Its almost like they have a plan and want to stick to it. Omg, all those years where we were just throwing darts at a board. Lets not go back to that. We have the benefit of time, lets use it.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Ok, lets look at the 10 teams that are "developing" qb's to take the place of their starters.

KC is, imo, the only team that is actually grooming their pick to take over for their starter. While smith isn't a bad qb he obviously isn't going to with them a title.

the steelers have ben playing at least another year and probably longer didn't draft a qb until the 4th round. The lions with the only other established qb isn't replacing him any time soon and definately not with brad kaaya.

That leaves the niners, broncos, browns, bills, bears, texans and giants...all of which desperately need a starting qb this year and are forced to stake their future on this years class. We don't need to do that so we didn't. None of the qb's that were available at 13 were worth that pick and none in this class were worth what it would have taken to move up to get them.

There is a time and a place for everything.

49ers - Do have a desperate need for QB, but invested a late 3rd rounder, which doesn't prevent them from future choices, but gave them someone to develop.
Broncos - Have two guys competing for the starting job, drafted a guy in the first round. Still took a shot on a QB.
Browns - Have Cody Kessler, who started for them and was drafted last year. Yes, they need a starter, but they didn't have to panic and showed they weren't going to by trading down from 12.
Bills - Have a starter. Peterman just becomes another developmental option.
Bears - Just paid a quarterback $15 million a year to start. They weren't "forced" at all.
Giants - Yeah, their two-time Super Bowl winning QB that has shown no signs of retiring really isn't a viable starting option. :?

I'm fine with saying that you just plainly don't like these QBs, but pretending they were taken out of desperation is silly. Really only the Texans were desperate and forced their hand because of that desperation. The other two desperate teams let the board fall to them and at least bought a lottery ticket.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,165
Reaction score
58,451
I think it's time to admit the most likely way for the Cardinals to get a quarterback in the foreseeable future is to trade for one or get one in free agency. Drafting one does not appear the Cardinals mode of operation and their area of success. I'm not saying the Cardinals should not try to draft one in the future but I think the other option is more likely to find a QB.

This year's draft was not a good one to go after a QB anyway.

If the Cardinals have some success next season it will be even harder to draft one. Most teams trading up pay a premium for a QB. This was the case even in this year's draft. I don't think the Cardinals are willing to mortgage their future for one via the draft.
 
OP
OP
az jam

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,989
Reaction score
5,215
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
#NFLDraft
You must be registered for see images attach
10 quarterbacks drafted, six in the first three rounds.

You must be registered for see images attach


Interesting that 5 of the teams that took Qbs made the playoffs last year and Denver missed by one game.
 
Last edited:

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,354
Reaction score
40,500
Location
Colorado
QB out of Wyoming is very good next year.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,196
Reaction score
16,294
Location
Modesto, California
so...lets say by next years draft Darnold is being hailed as the next Peyton Manning/Tom Brady type QB......

Steve Keim trades our entire draft to Cleveland for the 1st overall pick....we select the QB and walk out of the building.

would everyone be okay with this?...I would, if he is the guy for the next 15 years
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
49ers - Do have a desperate need for QB, but invested a late 3rd rounder, which doesn't prevent them from future choices, but gave them someone to develop.
Broncos - Have two guys competing for the starting job, drafted a guy in the first round. Still took a shot on a QB.
Browns - Have Cody Kessler, who started for them and was drafted last year. Yes, they need a starter, but they didn't have to panic and showed they weren't going to by trading down from 12.
Bills - Have a starter. Peterman just becomes another developmental option.
Bears - Just paid a quarterback $15 million a year to start. They weren't "forced" at all.
Giants - Yeah, their two-time Super Bowl winning QB that has shown no signs of retiring really isn't a viable starting option. :?

I'm fine with saying that you just plainly don't like these QBs, but pretending they were taken out of desperation is silly. Really only the Texans were desperate and forced their hand because of that desperation. The other two desperate teams let the board fall to them and at least bought a lottery ticket.
Most those teams you listed have no designs on the playoffs next year. They can afford to invest in a project QB. Cards want players to help win now.
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Kizer said he entered this draft early to avoid next year's crop of QBs.

Garoppolo and Glennon will have high potential of being available, as will Alex Smith and prob others.

Cards will be fine at QB.
 

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
Keizer said he entered this draft early to avoid next year's crop of QBs.

Garoppolo and Glennon with have high potential of being available, as will Alex Smith and prob others.

Cards will be fine at QB.

The soothing voice of reason.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,933
Posts
5,412,709
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top