Chillar signs with...

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
I dont want anyone the rams cast off of their **** defense anyhow.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
68,631
Reaction score
37,763
Location
Las Vegas
Doesnt seem like it was terribly expensive.
 

BigShtank

The heat dun frieded my brain
Joined
Oct 10, 2007
Posts
417
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
Disappointing, was hoping he'd wait for the Fitz deal to complete. Oh well, now that definitely throws the LB need into the draft consideration.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
26,999
Reaction score
15,848
Uhhh.... The Fitz deal has been agreed to yet still takes another week or two to finish it.


Frustrating stuff.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,481
Reaction score
5,708
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Singing Is Another Indication

Of the ineptness of the Cards front office. The team doesn't have the money to sign a FA, simply because they couldn't close the Fitzgerald deal. It's sad.
 

chicards11

Registered
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Posts
417
Reaction score
0
sweet.....thanks Fitz and thanks graves!

Signing Chillar would have freed us up in the draft for other areas of concern
 

BigShtank

The heat dun frieded my brain
Joined
Oct 10, 2007
Posts
417
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
sweet.....thanks Fitz and thanks graves!

Signing Chillar would have freed us up in the draft for other areas of concern

I would imagine that the Cards did offer him money and said they'd sign him for X amount once the deal is done because they do know their numbers now. Would have been nice to have him, but it looks like he probably got a better offer from the Packers than what the Cards offered him.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Of the ineptness of the Cards front office. The team doesn't have the money to sign a FA, simply because they couldn't close the Fitzgerald deal. It's sad.

What's sad, is that some here don't realize that this delay has nothing to do with the FO or Fitz. It's merely the time consuming due diligence of lawyers at league head office going over every clause before the final stamp of approval. And, clearly the Green Bay offer was superior, otherwise Chillar would have waited a few days more.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
And, clearly the Green Bay offer was superior, otherwise Chillar would have waited a few days more.

I think I am going to have to agree with this. I dont think we were offering more then 2 Mill a season. I think GB beat us by 500K per season.
 

Renz

An Army of One
Joined
May 10, 2003
Posts
13,078
Reaction score
2
Location
lat: 35.231 lon: -111.550
Chillar said when he visited here that his decision was going to come down to $. I don't think the Fitz situation had anything to do with it. GB just offered more money.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
I think you guys are overrating Chillar a bit. Guys who get 2 year $5.2 mill deals aren't the type to cry over. He would have been nice and added depth, but there are still other OLBs out there who can do the same. Colvin, or that guy from the Steelers (his name escapes me) could be every bit as good or better than Chillar.
 

lobo

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
3,310
Reaction score
230
Location
Inverness, Il
I think you guys are overrating Chillar a bit. Guys who get 2 year $5.2 mill deals aren't the type to cry over. He would have been nice and added depth, but there are still other OLBs out there who can do the same. Colvin, or that guy from the Steelers (his name escapes me) could be every bit as good or better than Chillar.

Some of us react like we just lost out on Lance Briggs...Chill out!! If they want to find someone of similar quality as you said they are out there, this is far from the end of the world.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
26,999
Reaction score
15,848
What's sad, is that some here don't realize that this delay has nothing to do with the FO or Fitz. It's merely the time consuming due diligence of lawyers at league head office going over every clause before the final stamp of approval. And, clearly the Green Bay offer was superior, otherwise Chillar would have waited a few days more.


Explain how a 4 year contract takes weeks for the head office to approve but FA's sign 70, 80, & 90 million dollar FA deals within hours of Midnight.

I don't buy this argument at all.

And to respond to the last sentence..... My guess is that the John Clayton story and the statements Chillar made about waiting for the Cards to make an offer caused the Packers to (smartly) put a deadline on their offer. It's awfully hard to pass up that kind of money if the team you want can't even get their duck in a row to make a counter offer.
 
Last edited:

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
26,999
Reaction score
15,848
I think you guys are overrating Chillar a bit. Guys who get 2 year $5.2 mill deals aren't the type to cry over. He would have been nice and added depth, but there are still other OLBs out there who can do the same. Colvin, or that guy from the Steelers (his name escapes me) could be every bit as good or better than Chillar.

I do agree with this to a point. My issue is that now we will have to address it earlier in the draft than we would have if we signed him.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
I do agree with this to a point. My issue is that now we will have to address it earlier in the draft than we would have if we signed him.

We will see. LB is one of the few positions where there are some decent vets who can contribute out there still. I personally have a gut feeling that when Fitz's deal gets finalized we will bring in Haggans from the Steelers, or if we are really lucky, Colvin. Either one of these would let us put off drafting this position for another year when Berry leaves.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
26,999
Reaction score
15,848
We will see. LB is one of the few positions where there are some decent vets who can contribute out there still. I personally have a gut feeling that when Fitz's deal gets finalized we will bring in Haggans from the Steelers, or if we are really lucky, Colvin. Either one of these would let us put off drafting this position for another year when Berry leaves.

You are probably right.

The Haggans idea probably holds a lot of water.
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,600
Reaction score
905
Location
Needles, Ca.
I would like to see us bring in Haggins or Colvin, either one, and K. Edwards......he has Pace type size......
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,985
Reaction score
5,204
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Haggans is in Cleveland meeting with the Browns.

Browns | Haggans visits Tuesday
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:18:50 -0700

Tony Grossi, of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, reports free-agent LB Clark Haggans (Steelers) visited the Cleveland Browns Tuesday, March 18. He will meet with team officials and coaches Wednesday, March 19.
 
Last edited:

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,367
Reaction score
25,080
Only the St. Louis newspaper has reported this so far. It's not on the Packers' site.

I would've liked signing him. Mostly because I like us to get who the coaches want. But, I'm not going to jump off a cliff if we don't.
 

mjb21aztd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
15,954
Reaction score
8,070
Man so disapointed we didn't get him, oh well lets try and get Colvin he knows how to win and would bring good veteran leadership
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,049
Posts
5,394,773
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top