Chris Young has been a major disappointment. His recent glimpses of coming out of it have been inconsistent. 'Stlll too many popups.
He's also a good kid who was mismanaged after his one promising season. You're a leadoff hitter. You're a #5 hitter. Now you're a #8 hitter. Let's put you at #3 for a few games. Then #2.
And now he sees that, with Melvin and his batting coach gone, Justin Upton is flourishing and he's not.
It would be best to give him a chance with another team. Especially with the arrival of Gerardo Parra, what are the D'backs waiting for?
They're stuck with Eric Byrnes but at least he's a backup CF until he's gone.
Chris Young should have been traded by now.
Since this thread was started Chris Young has gone:
10/23 (.435 BA), 5 doubles, 1 triple, 2 hrs, 4 RBI, 7 runs scored, 6 walks, 2 ks, 3/3 in steals attempts.
I can't believe Chris Young wasn't sent down to the minors in May, but he has one redeeming stat: He's the best center fielder in baseball according to the stat geeks.
Que? This wasn't thought out too much, was it?
Once upon a time, that was a standard abbreviated phrase in MLB. I never did like it. If you mean, "the best fielding center fielder", say it. That's what I think.He's the best center fielder in baseball according to the stat geeks.
I talked briefly about Chris Young last night, but I wanted to cover him in more depth this morning. He’s an odd case. His peripheral numbers are essentially equal to B.J. Upton – 11% walks, 29% strikeouts – because of the difference in BABIP, the two have around 25 points separating their wOBA. Young’s strikeout rate is odd though, like Upton, he makes contact 75% of the time. He’s no Chris Davis or Miguel Olivo. The company Young holds is decent; Evan Longoria, Adrian Gonzalez, Mike Jacobs, Kevin Kouzmanoff, and Adam LaRoche amongst others.
[...]
Young takes the most pitches in the zone, nearly 40%, while Cameron and Upton aren’t far behind. Those three – along with Mike Jacobs – make up the high water mark of the strikeouts. Jacobs is the leader of the pack and far less disciplined than the other three, which is why he strikes out 31% of the time. So, if Young is taking that many strikes, the questions that arise are: A) Why? B) Are they good strikes?
Quite a number of strikes are being called on the outside portion of the plate. So far outside, that Young is actually being called for strikes that aren’t really strikes at all. Notice the yellow lines are placed where the width of the zone ends, or is at least is supposed to. The pitches Young is getting called against him must be framed well. That’s something I would chock up as bad luck – in the same vein as receiving a favorable ball call or three dozen – more so than something Young could change.
So what’s the difference between Young and the guys striking out less? Probably nothing more than some umpire-based luck.
Those are just excuses. If he is at teh same rate as those guys, then he should be getting on base more, and he is not because he is trying to hit a HR every time he steps up to the plate which leads to Ks and Pop ups.
Don't want to hear that he sucks because of umps, he sucks because he sucks.
http://diamondbacks.mlb.com/team/player.jsp?player_id=455759LMAO.... Young is victim of bad calls and nothing more? Let's see... It's July and he's still batting under .200. Are we to believe that he is a victim and that his victimness is not subject to the law of averages?? That at some point he wouldn't be subjected to so many bad calls? Or - dare I suggest that at some point, he actually demonstrate the talent and skills you continue to thrust out there and Young would actually hit like a major leaguer and not allow himself to fall victim to those mean 'ol umpires who seem to have it in for him???
What a crock...
http://diamondbacks.mlb.com/team/player.jsp?player_id=455759
wow, I just looked at the numbers. AAA.