JCSunsfan
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Posts
- 22,114
- Reaction score
- 6,547
Just wondering if its a possibility.Wait, are you saying they will waive him NOW or next summer?
Just wondering if its a possibility.Wait, are you saying they will waive him NOW or next summer?
While that's nice it still doesn't make sense. I'd rather have Knight than Anderson, at the same salary.
It says that he is a 2nd year player and Ariza is a grizzled veteran that will help mentor the young fellow by example.Maybe Warren will be used in a trade for a PG. However, what does this say about Josh Jackson if the Suns start Ariza at the 3.
Ok well now things have changed. Since the money is all the same you have to say The Suns got the better of this.
So is the last year of Andersons contract a team option?
Next year. They'll be on the hook for what Knight would cost for the year, but they could waive him outright next summer.Wait, are you saying they will waive him NOW or next summer?
They are not out any more money. They were probably thinking of letting Chriss walk anyway. They had to decide between Chriss and Bender. They only have enough minutes to let one or the other develop. They are just moving on now, rather than letting it drag on another year. This roster is too crowded with young players anyway.
To be clear, the money is NOT the same. We are still paying Anderson 6m more THIS season than we would have Knight. Apparently Melton doesn't have a contract yet, so we'll see how Chriss' salary affects that.Ok well now things have changed. Since the money is all the same you have to say The Suns got the better of this.
So is the last year of Andersons contract a team option?
But the salary this year doesn't really matter. That's all just money in Sarver's pocket. Cap space in free agency next summer is what matters.To be clear, the money is NOT the same. We are still paying Anderson 6m more THIS season than we would have Knight. Apparently Melton doesn't have a contract yet, so we'll see how Chriss' salary affects that.
So Chriss+Knight = around 19m in 2018-2019
Anderson+Melton = 20 for Anderson + whatever Melton is going to cost. We could still pay less than the 6m depending on Melton's contract. Let's say he gets 2.5m for 2018-2019, then we really are only paying an extra 3.5 this year for the rights to control Melton. Not too bad.
It actually DOES matter if you're trying to still acquire assets this season.But the salary this year doesn't really matter. That's all just money in Sarver's pocket. Cap space in free agency next summer is what matters.
Ok well now things have changed. Since the money is all the same you have to say The Suns got the better of this.
So is the last year of Andersons contract a team option?
Yes, the cost for waiving Anderson will be the same cost we would have had if we waived Knight.No, but only 15.6m is guaranteed. So they can waive him next summer and save 5.4 million.
Not really. We did not have enough room left to actually sign anyone anyway.It actually DOES matter if you're trying to still acquire assets this season.
Trades, not signings. Anderson's salary is much harder to trade than Knight's was.Not really. We did not have enough room left to actually sign anyone anyway.
Right. So we swapped a vet pg who would be in the way of whatever starting pg they get before the season starts and we swapped our young prospect PF Chriss for a young prospect pg Melton. I would not call it a good trade. Its sort of a meh one. They had clearly decided that BK was not the starting pg we wanted. If that was the case, he had to go. He would just be in the way. We got rid of our most immature player for a vet big who can shoot.Yes, the cost for waiving Anderson will be the same cost we would have had if we waived Knight.
What will your thoughts be when/if that next trade doesn’t happen?Right. So we swapped a vet pg who would be in the way of whatever starting pg they get before the season starts and we swapped our young prospect PF Chriss for a young prospect pg Melton. I would not call it a good trade. Its sort of a meh one. They had clearly decided that BK was not the starting pg we wanted. If that was the case, he had to go. He would just be in the way. We got rid of our most immature player for a vet big who can shoot.
The next trade is the important one.
Yeah. I am agreeing with you. Its not looking bad so much as necessary housekeeping. It is not pleasant, happy, or good--just necessary.Next year. They'll be on the hook for what Knight would cost for the year, but they could waive him outright next summer.
So it really comes down to paying Anderson an extra 6m this year for the rights to control Melton, while getting rid of dead weight on our end. Starting to not look so bad.
I guess that depends on what the trade is. If it is Lin, I won't be that high on it.What will your thoughts be when/if that next trade doesn’t happen?
I guess that depends on what the trade is. If it is Lin, I won't be that high on it.
Now, if we could find a way to nab Lillard, I will be thrilled.
That's definitely debatable. But I think the point is that regardless of what we just returned, we still have assets, even outside the two players we just got. And I would argue that Melton might be the best asset out of the 4 involved.Even if the Suns were pursuing Lillard, their resources to land him just got weaker, not stronger.