Chriss and Knight traded

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
Ok well now things have changed. Since the money is all the same you have to say The Suns got the better of this.

So is the last year of Andersons contract a team option?
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,324
While that's nice it still doesn't make sense. I'd rather have Knight than Anderson, at the same salary.

I wouldn't.

The Suns finally got an opportunity to trade Knight and they took advantage. The Suns have already seen too much of Knight. It was a bad and costly trade.
 

Superbone

Phoenix native; Lifelong Suns Fan
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Posts
6,337
Reaction score
3,475
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Maybe Warren will be used in a trade for a PG. However, what does this say about Josh Jackson if the Suns start Ariza at the 3.
It says that he is a 2nd year player and Ariza is a grizzled veteran that will help mentor the young fellow by example.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
So. About Melton. The knock on him coming out was his shot, but so far in summer league, his shot seems to be a strength. He is an all around player who plays good D, shoots well, is a good defender for a pg. He is not a big leaper, but is reasonably fast.

So we swapped Chriss as a prospect for Melton as a prospect.
We swapped Knight as a vet for Ryno as a vet.

Both of the players we got seem to be better shooters, I think.

Meh. Ok.
 

High Stakes

Registered
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Posts
207
Reaction score
7
I am honestly confused by everyone's opinion on this trade. I do not think it is a bad deal at all. I mean, Brandon Knight has been beyond terrible for the Suns...Just because he had a new attitude over the summer, doesn't make him good. Second, we got Chriss out of here before he starts to become toxic and a big distraction.

The Suns will not compete next year. We are going to be a bad team. It does not matter if we do not have a PG. In fact, it might actually be better. Shaq will try, okkkooobooo can get some run, and we will most likely get a better draft pick. So who really cares who we start at PG.

For the people saying Anderson will not help us and is owed big money for 2 years....Ya ok, he will either be a great expiring deal or we can waive him after this season. Either way, he will be 10000000% better locker room presence than Chriss or Knight...and that alone makes it ok with me.

We will be a bottom 3 team in the west next season with or without knight and chriss...i do not believe we made this deal to become a "better" team, we made this deal to remove crappy attitudes from the locker room for Ayton and Booker. This is addition by subtraction and honestly who cares if Anderson is on the hook for 2 years....we are 2 years out from making the playoffs and chriss wont poison the minds of our very young squad..
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,324
Ok well now things have changed. Since the money is all the same you have to say The Suns got the better of this.

So is the last year of Andersons contract a team option?

As I understand it, Anderson took less guaranteed money on his 2nd year to be traded. Knight and Anderson's contract are now near equal. He roughly gets paid the same amount as Knight in the 2nd year. It is still guaranteed though.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,418
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
Wait, are you saying they will waive him NOW or next summer?
Next year. They'll be on the hook for what Knight would cost for the year, but they could waive him outright next summer.

So it really comes down to paying Anderson an extra 6m this year for the rights to control Melton, while getting rid of dead weight on our end. Starting to not look so bad.
 

DevonCardsFan

Registered User
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,819
Reaction score
802
Location
Your Mamas
I think this was more about dumping Knight and Chriss, than getting Anderson. Knight is a horrible PG and made everyone around him worse. He was top in the NBA at making players worse around him, that is the worst option at PG for a young team and add in getting bad attitude Lazy Chriss gone and its addition by subtraction. They have stated they wanted a stretch 4 Ariza isnt a real stretch 4 and they got a shooter that fits the new system and another young PG. I think this speaks volumes more about Knight not working out, than a chase for Anderson
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
They are not out any more money. They were probably thinking of letting Chriss walk anyway. They had to decide between Chriss and Bender. They only have enough minutes to let one or the other develop. They are just moving on now, rather than letting it drag on another year. This roster is too crowded with young players anyway.

The ony way Bender sees minutes is if we are actively tanking again.

Any of your small forwards is a better option at the 4 than Bender.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,418
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
Ok well now things have changed. Since the money is all the same you have to say The Suns got the better of this.

So is the last year of Andersons contract a team option?
To be clear, the money is NOT the same. We are still paying Anderson 6m more THIS season than we would have Knight. Apparently Melton doesn't have a contract yet, so we'll see how Chriss' salary affects that.

So Chriss+Knight = around 19m in 2018-2019
Anderson+Melton = 20 for Anderson + whatever Melton is going to cost. We could still pay less than the 6m depending on Melton's contract. Let's say he gets 2.5m for 2018-2019, then we really are only paying an extra 3.5 this year for the rights to control Melton. Not too bad.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
So Woj says that the Suns are continuing to try to work on another trade. They clearly did not see Knight as the answer at pg. Anderson adds another shooter with no more salary commitment. So the speculation about the Suns being content with the pg position, or not prioritizing it have been wrong.

Some say Lillard is being shopped.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
To be clear, the money is NOT the same. We are still paying Anderson 6m more THIS season than we would have Knight. Apparently Melton doesn't have a contract yet, so we'll see how Chriss' salary affects that.

So Chriss+Knight = around 19m in 2018-2019
Anderson+Melton = 20 for Anderson + whatever Melton is going to cost. We could still pay less than the 6m depending on Melton's contract. Let's say he gets 2.5m for 2018-2019, then we really are only paying an extra 3.5 this year for the rights to control Melton. Not too bad.
But the salary this year doesn't really matter. That's all just money in Sarver's pocket. Cap space in free agency next summer is what matters.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,418
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
But the salary this year doesn't really matter. That's all just money in Sarver's pocket. Cap space in free agency next summer is what matters.
It actually DOES matter if you're trying to still acquire assets this season.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,822
Reaction score
7,315
Ok well now things have changed. Since the money is all the same you have to say The Suns got the better of this.

So is the last year of Andersons contract a team option?

No, but only 15.6m is guaranteed. So they can waive him next summer and save 5.4 million.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Yes, the cost for waiving Anderson will be the same cost we would have had if we waived Knight.
Right. So we swapped a vet pg who would be in the way of whatever starting pg they get before the season starts and we swapped our young prospect PF Chriss for a young prospect pg Melton. I would not call it a good trade. Its sort of a meh one. They had clearly decided that BK was not the starting pg we wanted. If that was the case, he had to go. He would just be in the way. We got rid of our most immature player for a vet big who can shoot.

The next trade is the important one.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,418
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
Right. So we swapped a vet pg who would be in the way of whatever starting pg they get before the season starts and we swapped our young prospect PF Chriss for a young prospect pg Melton. I would not call it a good trade. Its sort of a meh one. They had clearly decided that BK was not the starting pg we wanted. If that was the case, he had to go. He would just be in the way. We got rid of our most immature player for a vet big who can shoot.

The next trade is the important one.
What will your thoughts be when/if that next trade doesn’t happen?
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Next year. They'll be on the hook for what Knight would cost for the year, but they could waive him outright next summer.

So it really comes down to paying Anderson an extra 6m this year for the rights to control Melton, while getting rid of dead weight on our end. Starting to not look so bad.
Yeah. I am agreeing with you. Its not looking bad so much as necessary housekeeping. It is not pleasant, happy, or good--just necessary.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
What will your thoughts be when/if that next trade doesn’t happen?
I guess that depends on what the trade is. If it is Lin, I won't be that high on it.

Now, if we could find a way to nab Lillard, I will be thrilled.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,489
Reaction score
9,700
Location
L.A. area
I guess that depends on what the trade is. If it is Lin, I won't be that high on it.

Now, if we could find a way to nab Lillard, I will be thrilled.

Even if the Suns were pursuing Lillard, their resources to land him just got weaker, not stronger.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,418
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
Even if the Suns were pursuing Lillard, their resources to land him just got weaker, not stronger.
That's definitely debatable. But I think the point is that regardless of what we just returned, we still have assets, even outside the two players we just got. And I would argue that Melton might be the best asset out of the 4 involved.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,669
Posts
5,410,664
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top