Originally posted by Tangodnzr
There we have it boys and girls. Another perfect example of tunnel vision and the resultant failure to comprehend any other view than the already pre-determined take, replete with the usual twisting of anyone else's comments to fit YOUR own spin, while accusing others of doing the very same thing you are guilty of.
Boring, simply boring.
....and to accuse ME, of all people, of being defeatist in regard to the Cards and to question whether I am a fan or not, is just about the most asinine thing I've seen in quite a while. You become more pathetic with each ignorant such posts.
Damn, he just clinched his argument with that one.
Not as a general rule, but in cases like yours I will certainly make an exception. Philosophically is that right? Maybe not, but it was you who first posted the foolish comment about me. Quit whining like a little baby simply because I respond to your insult.
Originally posted by Stout
Ah, the famous Tango
Well, 'there we have it, boys and girls'. I see, if nothing else, at least you are learning to imitate me. They say imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. Thank you, Stout, there may be hope for you yet. Tango completely ignores the content of my post, which called him out on several important points regarding his own posts, and goes directly to insulting. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!
Not only does he not, in any sense, address what I said, he felt the need to insult instead.
'Boring, simply boring' (which is actually a divergence from his normal 'amazing, simply amazing'). * see my first comment above
Tango, you said, and I don't have the direct quote in front of me, that since we weren't a SB team, that +/- 2 games isn't worth spending money.
No, that is not what I said at all, and that is a perfect example of what I referred to in my earlier response to your post in regard to twisting others words to fit YOUR take. Maybe you SHOULD have had the direct quote in front of you before you spouted off. what I actually said was:
You ALSO said, in more words than I am using, that signing Marco Coleman would somehow mortgage our future.
...and I was referring more to the personnel involved, not the money. Once again you interpret my words to fit YOUR take. My point was simply that bringing in an old free agent, on the downside of his career (and that doesn't mean just Coleman) in an attempt go for the instant fix now, would mean cutting a younger player on the roster that may very well pay better dividends a year or two from now.
Now, I called you on these items. Do you think you could have the common courtesy to actually respond? No, because you don't have a response, other than your normal childish drivel.Wrong again. Your wish has been granted.
In fact, I'm even going to go above and beyond your "calling out" and respond to a couple more of "your important points". I shouldn't even bother, outside of the fact that you prove the opposite of your position to other posters by this typical and unneccessary bombast. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!
You are half right here. My comment (regarding priority)was based on observation of the Cards action/inaction in this area...and in that sense it is MY take of the situation, yes.
....and your questioning whether I am "a frickin' FAN or not" is so childish, immature, and uncalled for, that I really shouldn't even bother to respond to YOUR drivel anyway.
YOU are calling ME defeatest? LOL, what a joke. I'm not the one that's been flooding the board with a bunch of negativity about how inept Graves and the Cards have been conducting business. YOU are the one that has been doing that. If anything I'm normally labeled a prime "kool-aider". YOU question MY desire to win? You are indeed becoming a joke!!!
