Compensation for Budenholzer?

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
Maybe I didn't say it well.

I think we win close to 30 games without adding anyone that wasn't on our roster at the end of the season as long as we have decent health. Hopefully, a new coach, a top draft pick and a solid bench addition or two and we'll be in 35 win territory, maybe even join the 40 club. I just don't believe that Ayton will be the big reason for that improvement. Out of the gate, he'll help us and he'll hurt us and we will probably argue over whether he's been a net plus or minus.
I don't think we'd be in the 35 or 40 club with just a top draft pick. With Len's body all but gone (not his game, just his body :) ), we need both a starting Center and Point Guard. Or it would probably be tank-land all over again. As has been posted a lot this season, most fans have had enough rooting for a team trying to lose.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,526
I don't think we'd be in the 35 or 40 club with just a top draft pick. With Len's body all but gone (not his game, just his body :) ), we need both a starting Center and Point Guard. Or it would probably be tank-land all over again. As has been posted a lot this season, most fans have had enough rooting for a team trying to lose.

Well, I was describing a fantasy really. A fantasy where every player on the 2017/2018 roster was still with us the following season (and healthy). Obviously we'll probably be without and thereby need to replace both Len and Payton. But I did it this way so it would be clear that I wasn't suggesting we needed to add major players to the lineup.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
I would strongly disagree with this. I'm in the middle, allowing for many possibilities. And I've read many posts here that have already tried and convicted the Front Office on this without a shred of real evidence.
The evidence appears to be in the results. We failed to attract our top choice. And considering the track record of Sarver and McDonough, there is nothing to change the perception that preceded it.

Every episode has not been a new day for the Suns. 'Just the same old-same old. And another brick in the wall of the disrespected reputation of our incompetent Front Office. There have been too many unprofessional incidents to just keep giving them the benefit of the doubt.

It is not my nature to ever give up hope but, geez, enough is enough. Sadly, we're stuck with it.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
No. We’ve been over this a thousand times. The tank was FORCED upon him during this year when the team he put together blew up in his face and Bledsoe demanded out. If he was truly planning on tanking this year, Bledsoe would have been shipped off during the offseason when he actually had value.

And two years ago, he didn’t start tanking until the last 15 games of the season after he realized another team he put together was atrocious.
Are you saying that benching Bledsoe and Chandler during the previous season wasn't tanking? Is that what you are saying?

The Bledsoe incident occurred at the start of this season because of it. And the Suns became the league's laughingstock because the Front Office didn't anticipate it.

I was happy to see Bledsoe gone, but not after training camp and a few games into the season. Unprofessional all around.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,443
Reaction score
68,670
Are you saying that benching Bledsoe and Chandler during the previous season wasn't tanking? Is that what you are saying?

I'm saying when a team tanks... ala the sixers or Memphis this year, you're in for the tank ALL SEASON. We tanked the last 15 games of the season with Bledsoe and Chandler.

The Bledsoe incident occurred at the start of this season because of it. And the Suns became the league's laughingstock because the Front Office didn't anticipate it.

I was happy to see Bledsoe gone, but not after training camp and a few games into the season. Unprofessional all around.

duh.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,369
Reaction score
12,544
Location
Tempe, AZ
The evidence appears to be in the results. We failed to attract our top choice. And considering the track record of Sarver and McDonough, there is nothing to change the perception that preceded it.

Every episode has not been a new day for the Suns. 'Just the same old-same old. And another brick in the wall of the disrespected reputation of our incompetent Front Office. There have been too many unprofessional incidents to just keep giving them the benefit of the doubt.

It is not my nature to ever give up hope but, geez, enough is enough. Sadly, we're stuck with it.

What makes you think Budenholzer was the Suns top choice? He's someone they didn't even know would be available until he was given permission to speak with the Suns this last week. Even then, they still had a number of interviews already scheduled. If he was their top choice, why would they have interviews planned through the remainder of the week?
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
We tanked the last 15 games of the season with Bledsoe and Chandler.
Which led to Bledsoe bailing early this season, leaving the Suns in a quandary and with the reputation of a dysfunctional organization and a full-season continued tank.

Well run teams make things happen, rather than wait for things to happen. Or hope for things to happen.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
What makes you think Budenholzer was the Suns top choice?
The fans knew it. Probably most of the Press knew it. But the Suns recent history of hiring bargain basement coaches and/or coaches learning on the job did not fit Bud.

And, as has been mentioned, Bud knew that the baby-faced General Manager to whom he would report was hanging by a thread.

So, in answer to your question, I can't say that he was the Suns top choice. Just that he should have been. And he should have been handled with the skill to make it happen.
 

Mr. Boldin

Mel Kiper's Daddy
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
1,634
Reaction score
284
After Bud spending two days with the Suns doesn't sound like he was using the Suns as leverage. I can see Bud using the Knicks as leverage though.

The part that bothers me about the Suns, why pull his name out of the running? Something happened for him to withdraw his name from consideration.

Maybe the Suns gave him their best offer and he walked away.

That's what i would love to know. Something happened. What was it?
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
The fans knew it. Probably most of the Press knew it. But the Suns recent history of hiring bargain basement coaches and/or coaches learning on the job did not fit Bud.
.
And, as has been mentioned, Bud knew that the baby-faced General Manager to whom he would report was hanging by a thread.

So, in answer to your question, I can't say that he was the Suns top choice. Just that he should have been. And he should have been handled with the skill to make it happen.
You presume A LOT
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,597
Reaction score
58,028
Location
SoCal
What makes you think Budenholzer was the Suns top choice? He's someone they didn't even know would be available until he was given permission to speak with the Suns this last week. Even then, they still had a number of interviews already scheduled. If he was their top choice, why would they have interviews planned through the remainder of the week?
Uh for the very set of circumstances that occurred . . . if they failed to land him. We don’t need know if he was their first choice, but we do know thy having other interviews lined up doesn’t indicate he wasn’t their first choice. That’s just called reasonably intelligent contingency planning if he was their first choice and something literally every team in every sport does. No one goes into a chia Hing search certain they’ll land their number choice and outside all their eggs in one basket.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,046
Reaction score
58,353
It actually probably is not in the suns best interest for the reason to become public.

Maybe. Hopefully the Suns didn't low ball him on salary. The forum would go crazy if this were true. :eek:
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,443
Reaction score
68,670
Uh for the very set of circumstances that occurred . . . if they failed to land him. We don’t need know if he was their first choice, but we do know thy having other interviews lined up doesn’t indicate he wasn’t their first choice. That’s just called reasonably intelligent contingency planning if he was their first choice and something literally every team in every sport does. No one goes into a chia Hing search certain they’ll land their number choice and outside all their eggs in one basket.

If there’s one thing this team desperately needs, it’s more Chia Hing!!!
 

Superbone

Phoenix native; Lifelong Suns Fan
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Posts
6,339
Reaction score
3,476
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I'm hoping the reason becomes public. The situation looked so promising.
I was listening to Marc Stein on AZSports radio and he said Sarver and McD were ready to offer Budenholzer a contract but then Sarver and Bud and a one-on-one conversation and then it was after that that Bud pulled out.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,046
Reaction score
58,353
I was listening to Marc Stein on AZSports radio and he said Sarver and McD were ready to offer Budenholzer a contract but then Sarver and Bud and a one-on-one conversation and then it was after that that Bud pulled out.

This is definitely something I did not want to hear.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,597
Reaction score
58,028
Location
SoCal
I was listening to Marc Stein on AZSports radio and he said Sarver and McD were ready to offer Budenholzer a contract but then Sarver and Bud and a one-on-one conversation and then it was after that that Bud pulled out.
Unless bud told sarver that he wanted kill two team members and wear their skin in a sacrifice to the basketball gods and sarver said no, this confirms my fears that sarver f’ed this up.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
You presume A LOT
...but I'm not the only one.

Until we hear something concrete (and we might never, as others have posted), we can only surmise.


But then, the report that it was a 1-on-1 between Sarver and Bud that ended it sounds like all the proof we need.

He is a minority freaking owner. Where does he come off bypassing his General Manager?

Unless he knows (as many of us feel) that his bargain basement General Manager is unqualified to negotiate, not just money but responsibilities.

That, too, is on the man who hired him as an underling whom he could bully -- Robert Sarver.


It may be a presumption on my part (and the rest of us who have posted similarly), but it is not A LOT of a presumption.

When it comes to Suns leadership under Sarver, the history is no mystery!

Damnit!
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
Sadly, sunsfan (aren't we all? :) ), you're right.

I guess Mr. Sarver got his NBA degree from the Donald Sterling School of Basketball Management.
Best thing we can hope for is the NBA to intervene with the Suns like they did with the 76ers. Jerry Colangelo took over the 76ers for a brief time to help straighten out that team and maybe he can come back to Phoenix and do the same for the Suns.
 
Top