Isn't that the catch-22 to that premise though? If a team goes out and spends draft picks and big FA money on a QB, how are they going to surround him with good players?
I get what you are saying, Mokler, and it could be a catch-22, but to me, it won’t necessarily be that.
One option to get around it would be to have a good team in place before signing the quarterback. I understand that the Cardinals have obvious holes in different positions, but I also think they have some of the best players in the NFL at other positions. Namely cornerback with Patrick Peterson, edge rusher with Chandler Jones and runningback with David Johnson. Two of those are considered premium positions. Then there are other potential playmakers like Markus Golden, Tyrann Mathieu and Larry Fitzgerald, and maybe even D. J. Humphries. I think they could make it work.
Then you can also draft well, as you mention. I have been very surprised with how little importance rookies has actually had to the most successful teams this season since rookies have been a somewhat decisive factor in the last couple of years. Going back to the Vikings and Eagles they have only had few of their rookies as big contributors. The Vikings have had third round pick center Pat Elflein as an important part of their offensive line and inside linebacker Ben Gedeon was a reliable player as well, but other than that they had nearly no contribution from rookies. The Eagles did get solid production from their first rounder, edge rusher Derek Barnett, as a rotational player on the defensive line but none other from their draft class did much of anything this season. Now, some rookies might have been very good on their special teams. I will admit that I don’t know that. By the way, I have excluded the Jaguars and the Patriots for various reasons. The Jaguars because they have had high draft picks in several years and thus have been able to select the biggest talents to surround quarterback Blake Bortles with. However, three of their rookies made huge contribution to their success this year. The Patriots is excluded because I think they are almost a two-man-show with Tom Brady and Rob Gronkowski. None of their rookies did anything on the field this year anyway.
You also mention the money, and you are definitely right that the salary cap is very important to the teams’ success. That said, it is fairly easy to manipulate the salary cap, and the Cardinals have cap guru Mike Disner to do just that. Because of this, and in the most extreme scenario, a team could without problems sign all the three, five or seven most expensive free agents. Now, teams don’t want to do that because it becomes an almost insurmountable problem down the road, but the point is that the salary cap is a dynamic tool that allow teams to not let contracts have such a huge effect on their options as we fear as fans. The Cardinals would without a doubt be able to sign Kirk Cousins and at least one other rather expensive free agent. Keep in mind as well that it’s not that farfetched to think they will cut several of the players on their roster with the biggest contracts such as Mike Iupati, Jared Veldheer, Tyrann Mathieu, and of course Carson Palmer has retired, and thus free up some cap space.
My overall point is that there are in fact multiple ways that the Cardinals could sign or trade for a good veteran quarterback this offseason and realistically expect to be highly competitive next season.