elindholm
edited for content
The person who owns these boards does not approve of the constant negativity that is on this board...nor did he on the Cardinals board. It doesn't encourage discussion or more membership.
And censorship does?
If by "negativity," you mean that we are rude to one another, then I agree we could afford to cut down on that. I also confess that I am sometimes a culprit, although I'm not nearly the ogre that some would make me out to be.
But if by "negativity" you mean giving our honest appraisal of how things are going with this franchise, then I don't agree that it is excessive. You can spin it however you want, but the Suns were a bad team last year. Moreover, they haven't exactly been on the right track for recovery. There has been a revolving door in the coach's office. Additionally, there have been trades clearly motivated by finances rather than by quality of basketball product: even if you don't put the Marbury trade in that category, the Robinson and Gugliotta trades surely are.
Every bad team has fans saying, "Don't make any changes, we just need to be patient and have time to gel." It rarely works that way. For every team that does improve that way (Memphis), there are several that never do (L.A. Clippers, Hawks, Warriors, Bulls). My opinion is that the Suns would be better off trying to make a significant change in their personnel than sitting on a mediocre roster.
If that makes me too "negative" to meet this board's upcoming new standards, please do me the courtesy of letting me know sooner rather than later. I'd appreciate the chance to get a head start on looking around for a new place to post, and I'm probably not the only one.
And censorship does?
If by "negativity," you mean that we are rude to one another, then I agree we could afford to cut down on that. I also confess that I am sometimes a culprit, although I'm not nearly the ogre that some would make me out to be.
But if by "negativity" you mean giving our honest appraisal of how things are going with this franchise, then I don't agree that it is excessive. You can spin it however you want, but the Suns were a bad team last year. Moreover, they haven't exactly been on the right track for recovery. There has been a revolving door in the coach's office. Additionally, there have been trades clearly motivated by finances rather than by quality of basketball product: even if you don't put the Marbury trade in that category, the Robinson and Gugliotta trades surely are.
Every bad team has fans saying, "Don't make any changes, we just need to be patient and have time to gel." It rarely works that way. For every team that does improve that way (Memphis), there are several that never do (L.A. Clippers, Hawks, Warriors, Bulls). My opinion is that the Suns would be better off trying to make a significant change in their personnel than sitting on a mediocre roster.
If that makes me too "negative" to meet this board's upcoming new standards, please do me the courtesy of letting me know sooner rather than later. I'd appreciate the chance to get a head start on looking around for a new place to post, and I'm probably not the only one.
Last edited: