cardsfanmd
ASFN Icon
I think what's holding Warner back is that he needs the same gift you got for your B'day. You could tell they were bothering him on the fumble.Brian St. Pierre = our 2008 starting QB
Last edited:
I think what's holding Warner back is that he needs the same gift you got for your B'day. You could tell they were bothering him on the fumble.Brian St. Pierre = our 2008 starting QB
It's too early to give up on Leinart.
I think he'll be a fine back-up.
Warner had his usual fumble. So what? That's a given with him.
By his second possession, he was back on target. The competition is over. Kurt Warner is our starter. St. Pierre is a good backup.
Matt Leinart's career is still in question.
He looked good from the stats!Brian St. Pierre = our 2008 starting QB
Warner had his usual fumble. So what? That's a given with him.
By his second possession, he was back on target. The competition is over. Kurt Warner is our starter. St. Pierre is a good backup.
Matt Leinart's career is still in question.
My guess is that it has to do with Leinart's psyche. My impression, once I got over being pissed, has been that the whole offseason approach by Whis was very calculated. I think he felt Warner could handle being the 2nd stringer to start camp better than Leinart could. While no declaration was made about the importance of this particular game, Leinart sure looked like he was pressing.why would Whiz go through the trouble and name Matt the starter so early in the year?
Before someone comes along and points to last years performance I want to ask one question. If Whiz thought Kurt performed so well last year and has outclassed Matt so bad, why would Whiz go through the trouble and name Matt the starter so early in the year?
. If not we need to think about where our QBOF is coming from AGAIN!
two words=Derek Anderson
I think there is some serious overreaction taking place tonight and even I found myself caught up in the moment and felt severly underwhelmed with the quarterback play.
Everyone is down on Matt for a terrible half of football and rightfully so. What I don't get is how anyone can draw the conclusion that Kurt should start based on what they have seen this preaseason. If you want to consider the totality of the situation then you must take into consideration Matt's performance in the New Orleans game as well as his complete performance against KC (Good and Bad).
At the time I recall many posters writing it off as nothing more than preseason dinking and dunking, and yet they are so distraught over tonight. We then moved to KC and how he was terrible the first half but yet when he led a nice td in the second half it was "only against backups."
Kurt on the other hand does not play against NO, then comes in for a solid showing against KC. He comes in tonight and goes like 2-4 with a fumble and now he clearly must be the starter? Hardly.
Before someone comes along and points to last years performance I want to ask one question. If Whiz thought Kurt performed so well last year and has outclassed Matt so bad, why would Whiz go through the trouble and name Matt the starter so early in the year?
After last week's game, it became apparent to me that Warner wasn't auditioning for the job. I think his performance last year was going to stand on it's own merit and his grand total of 13 passes this preseason seems to confirm that idea. Matt has been given a lot of rope and had plenty of opportunities to take a firm hold of the starters job. Tonight's performance and his struggles in KC have really surprised me. I was sure that he would perform, at the very least, adequately during this preseason to preserve the starting job into the opener. The complete implosion tonight is more disturbing in the big picture department. While his stat's in tonight's game were horrid, I think the fact that he essentially crumbled under the pressure of holding the job is a bad sign. Hopefully it will toughen him up and he can take advantage of these tough times but at this point, he's not ready to be the leader of the team. I think if he takes advantage of continuing to learn from Warner he might be ready if/when Warner gets hurt. Assuming Warner is now the starter.
This WAS Matt's big test and he did not perform. Ask anyone affiliated with the NFL in any way and they will tell you the THIRD preseason game is the one most important in player evaluation, and the closet to the real season. Matt just does not look ready to take the reins of this offense. IMO, the Cardinals can not go into Candlestick Park in two weeks with the Matt Leinart of Saturday night as the starting QB.
If you are grading quarterbacks, you have to give heavier percentages to the THIRD preseason game IMO.
Last nights grades from Totally_Red ..
Matt D-
Kurt C
That was no tie, Warner was better this week and last. Is it by magic that the run game suddenly came to life when Warner came in? It just seems if the offense as a whole has more confidence when Warner is in there. Leinart has made plays in this pre-season, but he hasn't looked confident since the Saints game. He is staring down his receivers and panicking in the pocket. On the draws Warner sold the pass and then calmly handed off the ball. It is the kind of things that veteran QB's do. I think that Leinart will be fine eventually, he just needs to be more confident with what he is doing. Our team could be drastically different next year, we can't afford to develop someone at the cost of victories. I wanted Leinart to come in and light it up so our QB situation could be settled. He has not looked like a starting NFL QB and has looked less poised then St Pierre(who right now is an awesome three). We can't afford to lose either of the first two games, Leinart doesn't look capable of insuring that.I agree with you if not for the words of the head coach all week leading up to the game. He said that this game is no more important in the evaluation of the QB position than the rest and he clearly acknowledged that they won't be gameplanning against a team that is known for doing more exotic coverages than most in preseason. It's not an excuse, but it is a factor. It affected both QB's as I was actually shocked at how few chances Kurt got to throw that ball around.
Look I am just as disgusted at the QB play last night as anyone, but if the tie goes to the winner then lienart is already the incumbent.
It just seems if the offense as a whole has more confidence when Warner is in there.
He's comming undone, I kind of thought this would happen, he's not built for a coach like Whis at least yet.