Where did the misconception that he was bad in Miami come from? He averaged 111 tackles and 6 passes defended per year. HIs last year in Miami, he was a monster, 134 tackles and 9 PD's. It's not his fault Miami's FO is a mess and doesn't know what they're doing.
From people who actually watched him play. I.e. ME.
He was a complete non factor from a play making perspective playing on medicore to bad defenses. 100 tackes doesnt make you a good LB anymore. You know who else had 100 tackles last year...
Nick Roach, Paul Worrilow, Perry Riley, and DeAndre Levy.
To quote Jurecki..... WHO?
Passes Defensed and 9 of them is why he was a "monster"? How about INTs, Sacks, FF, FR, etc..... you know the type of stuff you would expect from someone you just paid 22 million guranteed to.
If he was such a "monster" in his last year they wouldnt have cut him. Danny Trevathan had 129 tackles and a whole 10 passes defnded last year. Should Denver give him 22m guaranteed? Daryl Smith from Baltimore had 123 tackels last year and 18 (!!!!) passes defensed last year. He just signed for 4 years 16 million on the open market LMAO.
Dansby made enough big plays in Miami over 3 years that you could count on one hand. Oh yeah one other thing. HE WAS THE HIGHEST PAID ILB IN THE GAME.
Go watch the tape he was Houdini out there. You are googling stats to make a point thats just not true. Dansby was a stud in Arizona and has not lived up to they hype anywhere else.