David Johnson article

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,697
Reaction score
71,646
but not nearly as talented a runner, at least not yet.

agreed. Beanie gets a bad rap here, some of it earned, but he looked like a force to be reckoned with as a rookie in flashes and our FO/training staff pushed him back into the fold wayyyyyyyyyy too early, destroying his knees.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,125
Reaction score
6,561
agreed. Beanie gets a bad rap here, some of it earned, but he looked like a force to be reckoned with as a rookie in flashes and our FO/training staff pushed him back into the fold wayyyyyyyyyy too early, destroying his knees.

I think Beanie's knees were just bad. I don't think it had anything to do with the training staff or team.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
16,285
Reaction score
8,536
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
Bill Salmon is a former QB from UNI. He never played running back. He came to UNI from KU where he was Terry Allen's Offensive Coordinator. He also served as RB coach during most of that time. It's notable they took over a previously ranked program and never managed a winning record. At UNI Salmon serves as Assistant Head Coach as well as RB coach. I add this because he has always had his attention divided which makes it even more difficult to coach a position he never played. If you're relying on Johnson's numbers to validate Salmon's coaching, that's not a good deduction. Firstly, Johnson didn't play the position traditionally or as he will need to in the NFL. He was almost an H-back on many plays. Secondly, his running technique is badly flawed. He runs too upright, negating much of the power his size could provide. This is why so many reviews say he's not an inside runner. Thirdly, he lacks sophistication. Quick cuts and stutter steps, for example, are not moves he possesses. Yet if you watch his receiving agility it's clear he could be taught these moves. This is what running back coaching is designed to provide and I believe you have to point to the coaching for these deficits. Johnson is very raw technique-wise. The good news is he takes coaching well and is bright. He should develop into both a fine runner and receiver for the Cards. This is why articles, like the one beginning this thread, are so plused about Johnson.

First off great analysis, when reading this post all I could think about(hope for) was Arian Foster these are the same reasons he went undrafted. So we can see that players can develop these skills, lets just hope he does.
 
Last edited:

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,547
Reaction score
34,629
Location
Charlotte, NC
David Johnson just seems like a player that the Cardinals usually miss out on.

A size/speed back, the Cardinals usually draft a guy who does one thing really well and has major deficiencies in their game. The knocks on Johnson sound correctable.

I think I'm as excited about this pick as I was with picks like Mathieu, DWash, and the 2003 class. I'm expecting big things from David Johnson; I wouldn't be shocked if he supplanted Ellington as the feature back next year.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,065
Reaction score
31,436
Location
Gilbert, AZ
David Johnson just seems like a player that the Cardinals usually miss out on.

A size/speed back, the Cardinals usually draft a guy who does one thing really well and has major deficiencies in their game. The knocks on Johnson sound correctable.

I think I'm as excited about this pick as I was with picks like Mathieu, DWash, and the 2003 class. I'm expecting big things from David Johnson; I wouldn't be shocked if he supplanted Ellington as the feature back next year.

I dunno. Johnson reminds me a lot of Tim Hightower. :shrug:
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,529
Reaction score
2,380
Location
ASFN
David Johnson just seems like a player that the Cardinals usually miss out on.

A size/speed back, the Cardinals usually draft a guy who does one thing really well and has major deficiencies in their game. The knocks on Johnson sound correctable.

I think I'm as excited about this pick as I was with picks like Mathieu, DWash, and the 2003 class. I'm expecting big things from David Johnson; I wouldn't be shocked if he supplanted Ellington as the feature back next year.
Agree
 
Top