- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,700
- Reaction score
- 39,014
There is no hypocrisy.
The vast majority of the kids lives and careers would be significantly improved by installing this rule for the fact they would enter the NBA much better prepared, and thus have a better chance of making a career in the NBA. Rather than most who fall off and have to work at Rent-A-Car.
Whats Lebron James suppose to prove? That 1% of kids will go on to be superstars?
May as well say Aids isnt a big deal because Magic Johnson is doing fine.
It depends. Just yesterday there was an "unnamed NBA GM" who opined that Hamidou Diallo should probably stay in the draft, not because he's ready but "because if goes to school he might get exposed and wind up drafted lower than he would be this year on sheer talent."
The problem with the current system among others is that the longer you're in college the lower your draft stock gets because people wonder what the heck is that guy still doing in college.
the current system is set up for the most part to RECRUIT kids, not coach them so kids figure out quickly they develop more outside of college they can play year round don't have limits on time, pro trainers etc.
Calipari is famous for putting guys in the NBA but every year his guys come in and you read stories about how unprepared they are. Wall didn't know how to run an NBA offense, Anthony Davis had no post moves, they had to teach Cousins a drop step. Last year it was Skal who had NBA scouts absolutely stunned at how unprepared he was when he showed up at the combine. But Calipari has UK setup to get the most talent and you do that now by hiring recruiters not coaches.
As a fan I want Anigbogu and Leaf to stay at UCLA and play another year, Leaf get stronger Anigbogu get more polished. But in all honesty both would have been crazy to stay they get paid now, and they're going to get year round coaching now they will be better in a year not playing at all in the NBA than they would be after another year at UCLA.