Demarcus CUZZZZ

High Stakes

Registered
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Posts
207
Reaction score
7
DC

for

Morris 1, Morris 2, knight, 1 round pick

Done and Done…through in another 1st rounder if necessary

DO IT MCD
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,492
Reaction score
9,712
Location
L.A. area
DC

for

Morris 1, Morris 2, knight, 1 round pick

Done and Done…through in another 1st rounder if necessary

DO IT MCD

Do you really think the Kings would take that offer over Randall and the #2 from the Lakers?
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
cant trade knight

would have to include Len
 
Last edited:

SweetD

Next Up
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Posts
9,865
Reaction score
173
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Not sure Lakers would trade that #2 pick. I could see Randall+ a future pick.

I think if he is traded it will be to an East Coast team
 
OP
OP
H

High Stakes

Registered
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Posts
207
Reaction score
7
Not sure Lakers would trade that #2 pick. I could see Randall+ a future pick.

I think if he is traded it will be to an East Coast team


Lakers would def trade 2+randle…

but markieff is on a great contract, knight can be sign and traded, marcus whatever, and two first rounders

I mean that is a haul for sacramento
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,313
Reaction score
11,388
Lakers would def trade 2+randle…

but markieff is on a great contract, knight can be sign and traded, marcus whatever, and two first rounders

I mean that is a haul for sacramento

That's a bunch of nickels and dimes, while the number two pick is worth a dollar.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Lakers would def trade 2+randle…

but markieff is on a great contract, knight can be sign and traded, marcus whatever, and two first rounders

I mean that is a haul for sacramento

Knight can only be signed and traded if he WANTS to go to Sacramento. There is no way he would consent to that AND that could not happen for weeks.

Knight cannot be traded, period.
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
Do you really think the Kings would take that offer over Randall and the #2 from the Lakers?

Yea I think #2, Randle and Clarkson is a much more attractive offer than OP's.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,541
Reaction score
14,731
Is there a package we can put together that would interest the Kings?

Bledsoe/Len/13?
 

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,645
Reaction score
66,242
Location
Crowley, TX
Well there you go...
With speculation swirling about DeMarcus Cousins’ future with the Kings – just as Thursday’s NBA draft approaches – team vice president Vlade Divac reiterated that the franchise has no intention of trading its All-Star center.

“It is not happening,” an irritated Divac told The Bee when asked about the reports earlier today. “We’re looking for ways to improve our team. We need time to work on that, and draft a good player. I don’t care what the agents or the media people are saying.”

Asked specifically if coach George Karl has pushed to trade Cousins, Divac replied, “No. We have talked about how we can improve the team, but not discussed anything specifically with (Cousins) even though teams are calling us. I will not be in a position to be pushed around. I don’t know why we are wasting time talking about something that is not going to happen.”
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/ailene-voisin/article25347820.html#storylink=cpy
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Not a fan of Cousins, but if they'd take both twins and Bledsoe while leaving us Warren and/or Len, I'd be OK with this. You can't give up all the youngsters AND picks, while leaving bad contracts.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,443
Reaction score
68,669
Not a fan of Cousins, but if they'd take both twins and Bledsoe while leaving us Warren and/or Len, I'd be OK with this. You can't give up all the youngsters AND picks, while leaving bad contracts.

i'd do that deal. Hell, I'd probably give this year's pick too. But if we could rebuild with a core of Knight/Warren/Cousins/Len, that would be an intriguing group to build around with Miami's picks on the horizon.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,492
Reaction score
9,712
Location
L.A. area
Not a fan of Cousins, but if they'd take both twins and Bledsoe while leaving us Warren and/or Len, I'd be OK with this.

I don't see why the Kings would consider that. McMorris has negative value, and Bledsoe and MkMorris are minimally positive at best. Basically it's Warren or Len plus a bunch of crap for Cousins, and half the teams in the league will beat that offer.

For comparison, when the Suns traded for Barkley, it was Hornacek, Andrew Lang, and Tim Perry. Perry didn't have much value at that point, but Lang had shown more than Len has so far, and Hornacek was much more appealing than Bledsoe is now. Barkley was a more proven commodity than Cousins, but not by much; it's pretty obvious that Cousins is a superstar if he can get his mind under control.
 
Last edited:

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
I don't see why the Kings would consider that. McMorris has negative value, and Bledsoe and MkMorris are minimally positive at best. Basically it's Warren or Len plus a bunch of crap for Cousins, and half the teams in the league will beat that offer.

For comparison, when the Suns traded for Barkley, it was Hornacek, Andrew Lang, and Tim Perry. Perry didn't have much value at that point, but Lang had shown more than Len has so far, and Hornacek was much more appealing than Bledsoe is now. Barkley was a more proven commodity than Cousins, but not by much; it's pretty obvious that Cousins is a superstar if he can get his mind under control.

They probably wouldn't, but I don't think Cousins is good enough for us to get rid of three youngsters, and throw in all picks of value.

EDIT:
To clarify, I am not questioning his talent, but his mental health and maturity.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,784
Posts
5,411,329
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top