Derek Anderson gives us a much better chance to win than Max Hall

Early

Registered
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Posts
549
Reaction score
0
Of course Max Hall still gives this team a much better chance at winning...

Watch this post backfire on me. :stick:

Derek has been having a great game as well

Both QB's have been playing well today....So i really can't answer your question now, it's very close and making a rotation as is done now is maybe the best thing, who knows

I was just laughing at the comments on how Hall has been "sucking", when all he has done was playing great football besides one throw.

Anderson had one bad throw as well, the INT where the two penalties came.

All in all, the QB's are not a problem, it's a question on how we block and wheter our recievers are healthy. Breaston means alot and so does doucet no matter who you have at QB
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
THis team would be really good compared to the rest of the NFC if we had a QB...maybe even if that QB was named Matt Leinart.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
As for the title of the thread, you're probably right. But man, even with Anderson playing well today, he's bad.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Call it whatever you want. I have seen it couple of times. Tape, Video, whatever, it's the same. You are wrong. He blocked the wrong guy as he usually does.

You can write whatever you want mask that mistake, it doesn't help you. Max Hall was blinsided by an unblocked guy that Beanie should have blocked.

The INT is on Beanie all the way.

LOL Now Max Hall is left handed?

I know you only post this ridiculous stuff to see if you can get a rise out of people.

Getting really close to trolling if you ask me.
 

Red Dawn

Go Big Red!
Joined
Dec 17, 2002
Posts
4,208
Reaction score
1,295
Location
The West Coast of Arizona
They both suck. Cutting Leinart was the dumbest move that this team has ever made since it relocated to Arizona and that is saying a lot. This season is a debacle. Such a shame.

:yeahthat:

I've been trying to back Whiz but it's plain to see ML is far better than either Max or DA will ever be, partyboy or not. I'm off the Whiz bandwagon now.

Hall is just too small and DA can't read defenses and has no accuracy; DA's last INT was just stupid. The best option we have on the roster now is Skelton. I don't care if he is a rookie; he might suck, but he hasn't proved it yet like the other two so he may have an upside. Whiz obviously knows nothing about QB's.
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
Everything including a ham sandwich gives us a better chance than Max Hall, only Matt Leinart dosen't as a matter of fact.
 

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,850
Reaction score
13,459
Location
Albq
I only wished I was at he game so I could be at the tunnel and scream at Anderson what an idiot he is. That pic was just ungodly bad. Dude has less sense than a bag of rocks
 

Dayman

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
6,104
Reaction score
7,918
Location
Portland, Oregon
Max Hall updated stats:

41.0 rating 38/75 50.7% 360 yds 4.8 ypa 1 TD 5 INT 4 fum 2 fumL

Anyone gives us a better chance to win than Max Hall. Rookie or not, those numbers are straight pathetic.
 

Spielman

Non-Troll Rams Fan
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Posts
767
Reaction score
0
I dunno. I kind of like the current plan of playing whichever one has played terribly less recently.
 

Early

Registered
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Posts
549
Reaction score
0
LOL Now Max Hall is left handed?

I know you only post this ridiculous stuff to see if you can get a rise out of people.

Getting really close to trolling if you ask me.

I couldn't laugh more at this. You know that he was getting hit in a way that he couldn't see the rush? That means it was from the blind side. The blindside is almost always the other side when we speak about right handed QB's - sure - But in this case the QB looked to his LEFT and that means that his blindside on THIS play was from his right side.

So no, you are wrong again. In general you are right, but there are plenty exceptions to the rule during a game and that depends on where the QB turns arround. If he is looking middle and right, the blindside is the canonical one, and in this case, Hall just had ZERO chance to see the rush from the other side, Beanie left the blitzer he was set up to identify unblocked and Hall was BLIND....

You can call it trolling or whatever, i just can't accept the mistakes you continuously keep writing.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
Derek has been having a great game as well

Both QB's have been playing well today....So i really can't answer your question now, it's very close and making a rotation as is done now is maybe the best thing, who knows

I was just laughing at the comments on how Hall has been "sucking", when all he has done was playing great football besides one throw.

Anderson had one bad throw as well, the INT where the two penalties came.

All in all, the QB's are not a problem, it's a question on how we block and wheter our recievers are healthy. Breaston means alot and so does doucet no matter who you have at QB

If you really think Hall has been playing well you don't know what great football looks like. He was barely solid. Even if you take away the pick where he got blindsided he was 7/15 for 71 yards 1 TD 1 INT. That is not good. If you seriously think that is good QB play than your opinion is of no value on this subject.

As for DA, he was great until evil Derek showed up with the INTs. The first one was partly on LSH for not holding on and partly on DA for putting his 5'7'' RB in a position to get laid out. DA had time there he didn't have to throw to LSH.

The second INT was entirely on DA. He had time, he had a lane to run, and the WR he threw to was not open. If you don't want to blame DA for that one blame Whiz for trusting him.
 

Early

Registered
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Posts
549
Reaction score
0
If you really think Hall has been playing well you don't know what great football looks like. He was barely solid. Even if you take away the pick where he got blindsided he was 7/15 for 71 yards 1 TD 1 INT. That is not good. If you seriously think that is good QB play than your opinion is of no value on this subject.

As for DA, he was great until evil Derek showed up with the INTs. The first one was partly on LSH for not holding on and partly on DA for putting his 5'7'' RB in a position to get laid out. DA had time there he didn't have to throw to LSH.

The second INT was entirely on DA. He had time, he had a lane to run, and the WR he threw to was not open. If you don't want to blame DA for that one blame Whiz for trusting him.

I can't blame DA for the LSH INT. There is no way he can see the LB coming from the other side so fast. I can't blame it on LSH either, it was a huge hit, it's just great defensive play.

The last pick was just horrible playcalling and horrible throw and decision. Both QB's had one of these today and both were good otherwise otuside of that. Not outstanding but not horrible as people suggest here.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,571
Reaction score
38,809
I can't blame DA for the LSH INT. There is no way he can see the LB coming from the other side so fast. I can't blame it on LSH either, it was a huge hit, it's just great defensive play.

The last pick was just horrible playcalling and horrible throw and decision. Both QB's had one of these today and both were good otherwise otuside of that. Not outstanding but not horrible as people suggest here.

I actually disagree precisely because DA had so much time to throw there he had to survey the field. The LB didn't really come from that far away he was kind of laying in wait.

The QB can't lead his receivers into hits like that, DA has been doing it all year.

I don't know what to say, Hall has been awful we can't keep playing him, but DA is a tease, he'll play just well enough to get you beat and break your heart.
 

Early

Registered
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Posts
549
Reaction score
0
If you really think Hall has been playing well you don't know what great football looks like. He was barely solid. Even if you take away the pick where he got blindsided he was 7/15 for 71 yards 1 TD 1 INT. That is not good. If you seriously think that is good QB play than your opinion is of no value on this subject.

As for DA, he was great until evil Derek showed up with the INTs. The first one was partly on LSH for not holding on and partly on DA for putting his 5'7'' RB in a position to get laid out. DA had time there he didn't have to throw to LSH.

The second INT was entirely on DA. He had time, he had a lane to run, and the WR he threw to was not open. If you don't want to blame DA for that one blame Whiz for trusting him.

Well obviosuly with the last part of the game it¨s hard to say DA has played well - he was horrible considering that.. It was completely stupid what he did there..

Hall has played well outside of that one play. Yes, i do think so and please don't mention me stats, stats are for losers as Bucs HC correctly said. I still think that keeping him in the game would be the best, since outside of the one throw he was actually doing a good job considering how those plays developed and how much he was pressured.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,162
Reaction score
5,234
Location
Nashville TN.
Well obviosuly with the last part of the game it¨s hard to say DA has played well - he was horrible considering that.. It was completely stupid what he did there..

Hall has played well outside of that one play. Yes, i do think so and please don't mention me stats, stats are for losers as Bucs HC correctly said. I still think that keeping him in the game would be the best, since outside of the one throw he was actually doing a good job considering how those plays developed and how much he was pressured.

You have to be kidding. Hall should have been left in? He should not see the field the rest of this year. He is not now and never will be an NFL QB and I wanted him to get the chance.
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
Well we all know full well who made the decision to go with this QB crew and above him they allowed it to happen.

Bunch of peoples need to lose their jobs for this IMO.
 

Early

Registered
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Posts
549
Reaction score
0
I actually disagree precisely because DA had so much time to throw there he had to survey the field. The LB didn't really come from that far away he was kind of laying in wait.

The QB can't lead his receivers into hits like that, DA has been doing it all year.

I don't know what to say, Hall has been awful we can't keep playing him, but DA is a tease, he'll play just well enough to get you beat and break your heart.

It's hard to say, i'll have to look at the play again, i only saw it once, but i felt like the LB was in full speed from outside of the QB's vision for the slant. Great defenses hide the LB's in this fashion, making the cross from outside of QB's vision. Many great QB's have been lead to INT's and big hits like this, and you are not necessary a horrible QB based on this alone. I've seen Montana and Unitas making the same "mistake".. It's more a great defense IMHO... It's one of the most dangerous things for a QB when you have defenders coming across the field in full speed that you can't see and they time the play accuretly as Ruud did there.. LSH did had a chance to secure the ball as well but it was great defensive play.

And also just because he didn't had time it doesn't mean it was the wrong choice. How if that there was no other option and LSH was the only reasonable throw? Better then a sack later in such important situation.. Even risking an injury to reciever is ok then... It's hard to blame it on DA right away without further interpretation ..But if DA could see the LB, than i agree, it's a horrible decision

He is not a good QB tough, what he did in the end is absolutely inexcusable

Hall has still shown more than DA and if it's me, i start him again next week.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
Well obviosuly with the last part of the game it¨s hard to say DA has played well - he was horrible considering that.. It was completely stupid what he did there..

Hall has played well outside of that one play. Yes, i do think so and please don't mention me stats, stats are for losers as Bucs HC correctly said. I still think that keeping him in the game would be the best, since outside of the one throw he was actually doing a good job considering how those plays developed and how much he was pressured.

You know what else is for losers? Incompletions, stalled drives, not scoring, turnovers, and losing. All of which Hall has done non-stop since he's taken the reigns. Stats or no stats you can't honestly say that our offense has been good. You can't honestly say that if we had almost any other teams starting QB we'd be more efficient on offense?

You can ignore reality all you want. Hall has not played well. That's not an opinion it's a fact. 3-4 is a fact. 1-2 as a starter with the 1 win being thanks to the D is fact. The Bucs said you can ignore stats and get wins. We aren't getting wins. If you want to ignore stats then all you have left is losses. Hall is a loser by the Bucs coach mentality.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,162
Reaction score
5,234
Location
Nashville TN.
You know what else is for losers? Incompletions, stalled drives, not scoring, turnovers, and losing. All of which Hall has done non-stop since he's taken the reigns. Stats or no stats you can't honestly say that our offense has been good. You can't honestly say that if we had almost any other teams starting QB we'd be more efficient on offense?

You can ignore reality all you want. Hall has not played well. That's not an opinion it's a fact. 3-4 is a fact. 1-2 as a starter with the 1 win being thanks to the D is fact. The Bucs said you can ignore stats and get wins. We aren't getting wins. If you want to ignore stats then all you have left is losses. Hall is a loser by the Bucs coach mentality.

And if Hall was left in today no drama. Would have been a blowout.
 

Cards_Campos

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Posts
5,596
Reaction score
2,390
You must be joking...Hall has had hell of a game besides one throw. The INT to Talib was very bad, bad decision to go in double coverage and very hard throw to make. That was horrible no doubt.

Besides that he has been awsome QB today, there is zero argument to that

I'm not sure it's good to take him out because of that one horrible throw. KW has been making those as well with good outcome in the end.

He had something good going on (Hall) and he should learn from that mistake he made

WTF? Ryan Leaf was watching and laughed at Max Hall. Max Hall should never ever see the field again...EVER...EVA....He throws floating 4 yard passes that make Leinart look All Pro. He gets pumped when he throws a 11 yard pass...The NFL is way over his head.

DA gives us the best chance to win. His throw to Breasten for 40 yards was nice.

This game is all WHiz's fault..and yet he blames everyone lese. Listen ******** Whiz...You cant make cat Bark and you cant make a snake walk. We should have ran the ball numerous times in situations he had us throwing. Dumb idiot.
 

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,168
Posts
5,405,831
Members
6,316
Latest member
Dermadent
Top