Really? Garbage? 4 years ago Eli was considered a top 12 NFL QB. Last year it was argued that he might have elevated his play into the top 5 Qbs in the NFL. Now people are debating whether or not he is better than his brother Peyton Manning. I find it hard to believe that it is not a coincidence that his wide receivers of Hakeem Nicks, Steve Smith, Mario Manningham and Victor Cruz had nothing to do with this as I believe they were all added within the past 3 years.
I don't know what you're talking about. Eli was a Top 6 QB at the beginning of this season. Hakeem Nicks was seen as a very good player, but he's not an elite talent at the position. Eli was seen as an elite quarterback before the emergence of Victor Cruz.
People are deifying Eli in the press right now because it's a fun narrative to talk about in a week of no football news before the Super Bowl. No one who has half a brain thinks hat Eli's better than Peyton.
As I said, Eli Manning's raw statistics show that he's an elite level quarterback. He was a #1 overall draft pick for a reason. He's got a higher profile right now because he's playing in the Super Bowl, but six months from now regardless of what happens two Sundays from now he's going to be mentioned after Brees, Rodgers, Brady, and Roethlisberger. Just where he belongs. Any increase in his yardage numbers is because the rules have been relaxed. It's not like two QBs passed for 5000+ yards this year and a record number of QBs went over 4000, right?
And speaking of garbage, how you can compare an underachiever in Early Doucet to a standout like Victor Cruz is beyond me. I will concede that I would like to see if Victor Cruz can dupilcate his productivity next year, but he has become a player that needs to be game planned against while Early struggles to be successful opposite of one of the best wide receivers in the game.
I compare Victor Cruz more to Andre Roberts. Cruz is clearly further along, but he also has a better offensive line playing inside him and a better passer delivering the ball. Cruz and Doucet are VERY different players with regard to their abilities, but you know that already.
Teams game plan for Hakeem Nicks first, and then the running game, and then Victor Cruz. If you come in looking to stop Victor Cruz, you end up looking like the Atlanta Falcons in the Wild Card round.
No matter how you debate it, QBs need weapons to be successful. Brees needs Colston, Jimmy Graham, and Darren Sproles. Peyton needed Marvin Harrison, Dallas Clark, and Reggie Wayne to be successful. Brady needed Welker, Moss, Gronkowski, and Aaron Hernandez to be successful. Rodgers needed Greg Jennings, Jermichael Finely, Donald Driver and Jordy Nelson to be successful. It might be a "chicken and egg" quandry, but top QBs need top weapons and visa versa. There are a few notable exceptions like Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson and Calvin Johnson, but these are the top players at their positions and exceptions, not rules.
Did you just start watching football this year? It's all right; you've really done a good job figuring out the game. But Drew Brees was pretty good before Jimmy Graham even came into the NFL, and when Darren Sproles was playing in San Diego. Even won a Super Bowl without 'em. Would you put Marques Colston, Devery Henderson, and Robert Meachem in the same breath as even Hakeem Nicks or Reggie Wayne '12? Of course not. Why? BECAUSE THE FREAKING QUARTERBACK MAKES THEM BETTER THAN THEY ARE. Lance Moore looks good playing on that track with Brees throwing to him. Those guys are average or slightly better on half of the other teams in the NFL.
How were Reggie Wayne and (espeically) Dallas Clark when Peyton wasn't throwing to them this year? Wayne had his lowest receiving total since his third year in the league, and only scored 4 TDs. Dallas Clark only caught 34 passes. Is this because they just decided to suck in contract years? Or is it because THE BEST QUARTERBACK IN HISTORY ISN'T THROWING THEM THE BALL? Are Pierre Garcon and Jacob Tamme really above-average NFL talents, or is the guy delivering them the ball an all-time great?
Pretty sure that Tom Brady was "successful" enough before Moss and Welker came. He might have won a Super Bowl or two without them. He certainly did a good job of winning 10-12 games a year before they showed up. Yes, when surrounded by elite talents like Gronkowski and Moss (Welker is a different character that I don't consider to be an elite talent), his statistical production increased, but the Pats were like 2-4 in the playoffs before those guys.
Rodgers won a Super Bowl without Jermichael Finley, and while Greg Jennings and Jordy Nelson are really good, they're not as good as they look with Aaron Rodgers throwing them the ball. Replace Greg Jennings with Santonio Holmes and I bet the Buckeye puts up better numbers. Donald Driver? LOL.
As far as Doucet vs. Manningham, we will disagree. I view Manningham as a similar player to Steve Breaston, both whom I think are superior to Doucet. Now, we replaced Breaston with Doucet because we figured we could get similar production at half the price, and for the most part, the Cardinals were correct. I believe the same thing is true in regards to Doucet. If we want to replace Doucet's 2011 production, I think it is very easily done at half of what some have speculated his price will be (3 mil per season). I also believe that we have seen the ceiling of Doucet's production/skill and so if we are looking to upgrade, we need to look elsewhere.
But you're bringing in an inferior free agent to an unfamiliar system with a free agent. Doucet (and Breaston) did as well as they did because they'd been in the system for years, developing and finding roles. This isn't Madden; you don't just make a roster change and wait for natural ability to take over.
Neither of us have any idea what Doucet, Meachem, or Eddie Royal are going to make on the open market. You're right that Royal is going to make the veteran minimum plus a five-figure guarantee, but that's because he's proven to be awful and being a wide receiver. Doucet's best days remain ahead of him. How you can say that we've seen the best of Doucet when two of the worst quarterbacks in the league were throwing to him, both with less than a year of training in the offense, illustrates how little you understand about how player development and free agency movement--especially at a position where there are far more busts than successes in free agency.
Doucet is part of the solution for the Arizona Cardinals, not part of the problem. The problem with the Arizona Cardinals is a lack of production under center and a lack of protection on the edges.