Mitch
Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
So Mitch given you seem to have the magic going, who do you like in R2?
Kyle Van Noy---but I don't think he'll be available at #52.
Let me sleep on it and get back to you.
What's your call in R2?
So Mitch given you seem to have the magic going, who do you like in R2?
Good call Mitch but as you stated, it was a total need pick. Hope it works out.
I can see a trade up for Ealy, Hagemann, or Attichou in R2.
Glad someone else saw the writting on the wall that this kid was rising on draft boards. Which just means the media catching up with what the scouts already knew months prior.
Only thing I am worried about is if he will just be a Adrian Wilson with Better hands or not. Which means we will still suffer in coverage some, with just a few more INT's to show for it. We shall see.
I'd prefer we didn't trade up, there's too much talent still on the board but I'd jump on Ealy if he's still there at 52. If not, either of the other two you mentioned or maybe Amaro.
Steve
Glad someone else saw the writting on the wall that this kid was rising on draft boards. Which just means the media catching up with what the scouts already knew months prior.
Only thing I am worried about is if he will just be a Adrian Wilson with Better hands or not. Which means we will still suffer in coverage some, with just a few more INT's to show for it. We shall see.
Mitch you always swing for the fences and this time you made solid contact. Nice prediction.
Except the part about being our pick at 52, which he had correctly identified where this pick should have went.
I think Bryan McCann will make the roster. Whitley, because of his speed and versatility, has a chance.
I think one of those tall CBs---McGill, SJB or Desir---could make a good deal of sense in round 3. Like you said, they could be used to cover TEs.
Rashad Johnson is, imo, better than he gets credit for. So, we'll see. He seems to get a little stronger and a little more sudden each year.
I could see SK trading down and taking Bucannon---but, it's hard to say because SK is going to draft BPA, not for need.
A few posts down he says:
Pretty much nailed it.
A few posts down he says:
Pretty much nailed it.
Except he drafted for need, not BPA..
Guess, for once, I predicted a Cardinals' draft trade.
When I watched the tapes of Pryor, Clinton-Dix and Bucannon, what became plain to me was that Pryor was a little small for the box and covering TEs, is a big hitter, but as i said before he's like A-Dub he hits and at times does not wrap up. Clinton-Dix is a deep FS safety who has length but he's not very tough (so that didn't seem to fit the Cardinals' need) and Bucannon seemed to have everything the Cardinals were looking for---size, speed (4.48), toughness (best tackling safety in the draft) and, best of all, the ability to cover TEs.
It sure felt good for the past three weeks to, to be watching Path to The Draft every night and seeing Curtis Conway claim night after night that Deone Bucannon is the best safety in the draft.
I think that because Bucannon played at Washington St. and not Louisville or Alabama that many of the pundits were reluctant to rank him above the other two. But when you watch the tape, Bucannon is a special talent...and while Pryor and Clintion -Dix are very good talents, for what the Cardinals need, Bucannon is the best talent.
Plus, Keim brokered an extra third round pick. Yes!
I could see SK trading down and taking Bucannon---but, it's hard to say because SK is going to draft BPA, not for need.
Except the part about being our pick at 52, which he had correctly identified where this pick should have went.
Impressive call, Mitch.![]()
![]()
I don't know Chris I think Bucannon is 1st round talent as are the better part of the picks that will go in round 2. No way he was ever going to be there at 52 so I think it was a bold move to take him at 27 but given the premium on safeties it was the right call. If he turns out to be as good as I expect we will be happy to pay him rookie money at a rate of a little under $8M over the four year term vs the $40M per Seattle will be shelling out for Earl Thomas. If I am not mistaken by taking him in R1 we get him for an extra year right?