This is how I know that you guys are looking at numbers without context. Or are blinded by bias in some form or another.
That's also because he was/is usually the sole and/or main distributor or at least expected to be when he's on the floor. Even when Eric was injured and out during the 2013-2014 season, we were still attempting the "dual-PG" nonsense with whatever band-aid we happened to be running on the floor with Goran.
In many situations, he was our best scorer on the floor, so he assisted less. However, whatever assists he DID hand out, was handed out at a similar clip and a similar TO rate as any of the others on the list, based on usage.
Since it's all about this for you, are you saying then that everyone else on this list is "mediocre" as passers? What about Eric, whom many of you championed over Goran? Why is his UTTER mediocrity (based on his turnovers vs his assists) better to stomach than Goran's?
I'm seriously just wanting to know where you guys are getting off denigrating someone while espousing others that are just as "mediocre" as the one you're all attempting to rake over the coals.
I don't think anyone has championed Bledsoe as a passer.
And this isn't just about the stats, there is plenty of in-game context to say he is not a great passer. While he is great in transition he really is not near as effective in half court against set defenses, because he isn't the kind of guy who can pass through traffic. Which also ties into he HUGE reliance on a pick and roll partner. It opens up space for him and gives him one easy pass option.
I think this is a strange debate to even have. Do you honestly think he is a top tier distributor? Not talking about him as a complete player, because I like the total package, but purely as a passer.
And honestly, you're characterizing this stuff as "getting off" on denigrating him, and claim we think he is a "washed out wannabe". I wanted to KEEP Dragic (as did JC), I think he is, overall, a good player, he just isn't anything special as a passer. But this is the kind of stuff that brings upon the more colorful rhetoric in these debates. When merely pointing out strengths and weakness of Dragic gets you blasted as "getting off" on a bias. I think you need to ease off and look at what we've repeatedly said about his overall talents.