Each day I lose more respect for the NFL & the game we all love!!!

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,271
Reaction score
6,203
Location
Dallas, TX
:Is it protect the shield or protect "The Game"?

1) Each year it seems 3-4 rules change affecting how the players play it & how the refs officiate it. The fans become confused, the players become confused & the refs become more & more confused. :bang:

I get that the league is trying to make the NFL game safer, but do new rules really make it safer? Isn't it football, where one guy is trying to beat the crap out of the other? IMO nothing will ever eliminate concussions, given the brain slams into a players skull at violent speeds. New helmets? Possibly somewhat. Now, we see peeps going low & blowing out knees because of those rules...that will probably change next year. I don't have the answers to correct all the injuries or even lessen them, but peeps are gonna get hurt because of the games violence. When does it end? Flag football? No helmets? 2 hand touch? Pushing 16 games to 18 & expanding playoff teams to 14 or even 16 is gonna increase this injuries...it's gonna happen at some point! Possession on a catch in this league is differant with every ref...pass interference also. The tuck rule, blatant fumbles that aren't challengeable. Wtf :bang:

2) Then the Commish starts talking about a team in London. How many countries are next? A Global World Football League?

3) Talk has been brewing of a future Super Bowl in London? Seriously? Jeez. That won't mess any teams sleep or preparing habits for the NFLs biggest game. I guess that game will be moved to 12 pm to start at 6 pm British time, or will the league play its usual night SB night game & make the Brits go to the game in the AM next morning? Lol I get that there are big time NFL fans across the ocean, but this is Americas game...it's #1 sport & it's biggest game should be played in the good ol USA IMO.

4) Now Goodell & his cronies in NY are talking about possibly moving next weeks Super Bowl to Fri, Sat, later or earlier on Sunday. Now get this...possibly even Monday if the weather doesn't cooperate. :mulli: Seriously? Are you guys freaking morons? Didn't you crazies think of this when putting Americas Game in NJ? This is exactly why the Title game shouldn't be played in possible bad weather or you should leave things as they are scheduled!!! What about the fans who are traveling throughout the country to attend your freaking Super Bowl? Many who have paid BIG $$$ to see their team or possibly have a once in a lifetime experience. What about fans those fans who can't get to NY early Sat? A Monday game? What about the your hard working fans who have flights scheduled back to their home cities? :bang:

I live in Dallas & this city was bashed for not being prepared for a blizzard a few years back. People sued the NFL & Devil Jones :devil: because of seating issues. Attending any of the NFL functions were nearly impossible to attend & businesses lost thousands & thousands of dollars because of the weather. Did the NFL learn its lesson? Hell no, they rewarded NY/NJ a Super because of their new stadium.

I don't have an issue with the game being played in bad weather & think it will be kinda cool to see it on TV, but possibly screwing your fans because of bad weather is incomprehensible IMO. Your right Roger, it's all about "Protecting the Shield" & $$$, not about "The Game" or it's fans!!! :mad::mad::mad:

Off my soapbox now:moon::moon:
 
Last edited:

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
:Is it protect the shield or protect "The Game"?

1) Each year it seems 3-4 rules change affecting how the players play it & how the refs officiate it. The fans become confused, the players become confused & the refs become more & more confused. :bang:

I get that the league is trying to make the NFL game safer, but do new rules really make it safer? Isn't it football, where one guy is trying to beat the crap out of the other? IMO nothing will ever eliminate concussions, given the brain slams into a players skull at violent speeds. New helmets? Possibly somewhat. Now, we see peeps going low & blowing out knees because of those rules...that will probably change next year. I don't have the answers to correct all the injuries or even lessen them, but peeps are gonna get hurt because of the games violence. When does it end? Flag football? No helmets? 2 hand touch? Pushing 16 games to 18 & expanding playoff teams to 14 or even 16 is gonna increase this injuries...it's gonna happen at some point! Possession on a catch in this league is differant with every ref...pass interference also. The tuck rule, blatant fumbles that aren't challengeable. Wtf :bang:

2) Then the Commish starts talking about a team in London. How many countries are next? A Global World Football League?

3) Talk has been brewing of a future Super Bowl in London? Seriously? Jeez. That won't mess any teams sleep or preparing habits for the NFLs biggest game. I guess that game will be moved to 12 pm to start at 6 pm British time, or will the league play its usual night SB night game & make the Brits go to the game in the AM next morning? Lol I get that there are big time NFL fans across the ocean, but this is Americas game...it's #1 sport & it's biggest game should be played in the good ol USA IMO.

4) Now Goodell & his cronies in NY are talking about possibly moving next weeks Super Bowl to Fri, Sat, later or earlier on Sunday. Now get this...possibly even Monday if the weather doesn't cooperate. :mulli: Seriously? Are you guys freaking morons? Didn't you crazies think of this when putting Americas Game in NJ? This is exactly why the Title game shouldn't be played in possible bad weather or you should leave things as they are scheduled!!! What about the fans who are traveling throughout the country to attend your freaking Super Bowl? Many who have paid BIG $$$ to see their team or possibly have a once in a lifetime experience. What about fans those fans who can't get to NY early Sat? A Monday game? What about the your hard working fans who have flights scheduled back to their home cities? :bang:

I live in Dallas & this city was bashed for not being prepared for a blizzard a few years back. People sued the NFL & Devil Jones :devil: because of seating issues. Attending any of the NFL functions were nearly impossible to attend & businesses lost thousands & thousands of dollars because of the weather. Did the NFL learn its lesson? Hell no, they rewarded NY/NJ a Super because of their new stadium.

I don't have an issue with the game being played in bad weather & think it will be kinda cool to see it on TV, but possibly screwing your fans because of bad weather is incomprehensible IMO. Your right Roger, it's all about "Protecting the Shield" & $$$, not about "The Game" or it's fans!!! :mad::mad::mad:

Off my soapbox now:moon::moon:

+ 12,000!
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,301
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SE Valley
Had basically this same conversation with a friend at lunch today. Goodell doesn't seem to know "when to leave well enough alone."
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
Agree with most of this. Except I think the average fan is clueless about most of the rules. They know first downs and touchdowns but little else. Those fans probably approve of the new sissified NFL. For diehards like people on this forum it may seem like it's being ruined to some extent but for the average guy I doubt it. I doubt most people knew the rules of old style gladiatorial combat either but they still watched.

When we were younger most altercations at worst could end up in a fistfight. Nowadays they just shoot your ass. Times change. I'm not surprised by a few rules trying to take some of the aggression out of the game. Regarding the extra points proposed change, I can't even speak to that. But if you take a game like chess for example for centuries they played games that often took days, and over time the games shortened so people could watch. Nowadays they use clocks for each move so a game only takes a couple hours. All so it would be more spectator-friendly. That's what we're seeing with football.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP
Buckybird

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,271
Reaction score
6,203
Location
Dallas, TX
Had basically this same conversation with a friend at lunch today. Goodell doesn't seem to know "when to leave well enough alone."

Exactly. Sometimes change isn't always good IMO

After hearing about a possible Monday Super Bowl that would screw many fans attending with travel arrangements getting home, it just sent me over the edge today. Granted it might not happen, but if it did imagine the lawsuits waiting to happen against the league. It's basically, screw the fans we're gonna do it our way :bang:

If the Commish REALLY cares what his fans think, he should quit jacking with the game. It seems the players really despise Goodell & he needs to wake the **** up ASAP.
 
OP
OP
Buckybird

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,271
Reaction score
6,203
Location
Dallas, TX
Agree with most of this. Except I think the average fan is clueless about most of the rules. They know first downs and touchdowns but little else. Those fans probably approve of the new sissified NFL. For diehards like people on this forum it may seem like it's being ruined to some extent but for the average guy I doubt it. I doubt most people knew the rules of old style gladiatorial combat either but they still watched.

When we were younger most altercations at worst could end up in a fistfight. Nowadays they just shoot your ass. Times change. I'm not surprised by a few rules trying to take some of the aggression out of the game. Regarding the extra points proposed change, I can't even speak to that. But if you take a game like chess for example for centuries they played games that often took days, and over time the games shortened so people could watch. Nowadays they use clocks for each move so a game only takes a couple hours. All so it would be more spectator-friendly. That's what we're seeing with football.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk

Agree with much of what you say here. The whole deal to this new regime is its all about $$$. The honest truth about the eliminating the extra point out of the game probably comes down 7-10 mins out of an actual game time on TV...which in turn will be sold off to the highest bidder for more commercials & more ca$h for the league IMO. Another way to fatten the leagues wallets & probably not giving the players a dime. :bang:
 

TigToad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 17, 2003
Posts
1,787
Reaction score
417
Location
Bally’s Sports needs to go away
If they remove the extra point, I'll be very tempted to stop being a season ticket holder. You have to draw the line somewhere. The game has to still be football in the end.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,301
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SE Valley
But if you take a game like chess for example for centuries they played games that often took days, and over time the games shortened so people could watch. Nowadays they use clocks for each move so a game only takes a couple hours. All so it would be more spectator-friendly. That's what we're seeing with football.
And look what has happend to chess - it no longer draws the big stadium crowds and rich television contracts that it used to!

;)
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
Agree with most of this. Except I think the average fan is clueless about most of the rules. They know first downs and touchdowns but little else. Those fans probably approve of the new sissified NFL. For diehards like people on this forum it may seem like it's being ruined to some extent but for the average guy I doubt it. I doubt most people knew the rules of old style gladiatorial combat either but they still watched.

When we were younger most altercations at worst could end up in a fistfight. Nowadays they just shoot your ass. Times change. I'm not surprised by a few rules trying to take some of the aggression out of the game. Regarding the extra points proposed change, I can't even speak to that. But if you take a game like chess for example for centuries they played games that often took days, and over time the games shortened so people could watch. Nowadays they use clocks for each move so a game only takes a couple hours. All so it would be more spectator-friendly. That's what we're seeing with football.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk

its amazing some of the football conversations people bring to me. Some sports guys got it going on, some come to me and talk about the sillyest stuff and its obvious that they really dont know much about the subject at hand.
 

coyoteshockeyfan

Fool In The Rain
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Posts
8,942
Reaction score
405
Nobody's boycotting the Super Bowl if its held in London. Let's not kid ourselves.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
I'm a football fan and a big Cards fan. It's time to make things more like they were. Baseball add's some changes, but it's still 3 strikes, 4balls .nine innings. Football must remain the same. Yes better helmets. I'm for better padding, but we most respect the type of game it is, a hitting game.

The game plans,less stupid penaltys, hitting without intent to hurt. Put the game in he hands of the players, coaches and zebras. Let our players practice what will be allowed.

I love American football , but we don' t need to play in Europe. I they want teams to travel 16 hours and more to count within the standings it's not fair to those teams. Forget England, france al though I love those countrys, but it's our game.

Football 100 yaqrd field divided by 10 yards to the 50,11 players on offense and defense, special teams. Please let it be!

GBR
40
 

CardNots

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
4,934
Reaction score
5,391
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
Nice pen Buckybird!

I'm still adjusting to what the hd panel has done to enhance football. The point here is the hd panel has done more for the popularity of the game than the combined efforts from those running the sport.

I know I'm older and wiser now but the business aspect is easy to see. I remember when the goal was to survive. Now, how much can we grow this business. This will never end as revenue streams run the game.

The impact is: I wouldn't miss a beat if I missed the Super Bowl. I see enough business at work. Eventually there will be more who feel the same.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I'm a football fan and a big Cards fan. It's time to make things more like they were. Baseball add's some changes, but it's still 3 strikes, 4balls .nine innings. Football must remain the same. Yes better helmets. I'm for better padding, but we most respect the type of game it is, a hitting game.

The game plans,less stupid penaltys, hitting without intent to hurt. Put the game in he hands of the players, coaches and zebras. Let our players practice what will be allowed.

I love American football , but we don' t need to play in Europe. I they want teams to travel 16 hours and more to count within the standings it's not fair to those teams. Forget England, france al though I love those countrys, but it's our game.

Football 100 yaqrd field divided by 10 yards to the 50,11 players on offense and defense, special teams. Please let it be!

GBR
40

The problem with trying to play football the way it was is that modern techniques in nutrition and training have made the 100X53 yard field obsolete its just too small for today's players.

40 years ago who would have thought we'd have so many guys 6'5" 265lbs who were as quick as cats playing LB.

The players are just too big and too fast and too well trained to play the way they did at the time of the first Super Bowl. The Offensive line for Don Coryell's first playoff team averaged 264lbs! The Defensive Ends were 255 and 244. The Defensive Tackles 261 and 270. And they didn't train like the players do today.

The NFL had to open up the game and limit contact to keep these guys from killing each other.

:soapbox:
 

clif

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Posts
8,967
Reaction score
214
Location
Phoenix, az
Exactly DuckJake. It is only a matter of time before things have to change for the longevity of the league. They have to create new revenue streams to pay for all the lawsuits they have been and will be hit with. People love this game and don't want it to change but yet they sue for every little thing. They need lawyers to watch other lawyers. They need lawyers to protect them from the players and vice versa. Fans bitch about changes and what not, but I think a lot of the things they did were meant to help and will pay dividends.

I also think it's a double edged sword. They have to protect players so these great players will be able to play week in and week out so you the fan will want to show up at the games to pay the prices needed to pay these players these exorbitant salaries.

IMO they had to have a Super Bowl in New York. It is the media capital of the world. Now I don't believe it will be a regular thing so let it go.

I think the bigger crime was them having a Super Bowl in Detroit and Jacksonville or even in Dallas to a point.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
I actually believe there is a concerted effort to destroy football in this country. We have Goodell trying to turn the game into 2 hand touch and today I read an article saying that the players on Northwestern are forming a union. I believe the soccer lobby is responsible.
 

desertdawg

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Posts
21,831
Reaction score
1
Location
@Desertdawg777
I actually believe there is a concerted effort to destroy football in this country. We have Goodell trying to turn the game into 2 hand touch and today I read an article saying that the players on Northwestern are forming a union. I believe the soccer lobby is responsible.
:grabs:
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
Put the entire player in one big bubble.

A personal body bubble and watch them bounce off each other. Catching the ball will be tougher as will holding onto the ball but no one will get hurt.

Cheerleaders should be naked.

These are changes I can support.
 

SO91

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Posts
3,046
Reaction score
371
I take it a sarcasm filter is something that is not wired into your brain. :rolleyes:

Unless it's blatantly obvious, sarcasm in print can easily be missed. There is a smiley to avoid that confusion ;)
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
Unless it's blatantly obvious, sarcasm in print can easily be missed. There is a smiley to avoid that confusion ;)

I would have thought claiming a conspiracy would be blatantly obvious that it was sarcasm but I digress.
 

SO91

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Posts
3,046
Reaction score
371
I would have thought claiming a conspiracy would be blatantly obvious that it was sarcasm but I digress.

Lol, fair enough. But this is a message board brother. Every single MB in the history of MBs has its fair share of tinfoil hat members. You just never know.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,294
Posts
5,406,352
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top