Fire Petzing now

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,246
Reaction score
26,790
Location
Orlando, FL
Everyone wants Petzing to call 20 yard passes with a receiving group that shows no sign of getting open 20 yards down the field and an Oline that can’t hold a pocket long enough to let the receivers get that deep. This roster is just not designed to execute 20+ yard plays. You see one occasionally but not on third and long when the opponent is defending against it, it’s a bridge too far. They might try rolling Murray out and if he had time to setup, maybe it might work, but more likely he throw on the run and just floats an interception vulnerable ball.
 

602 Native

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
2,000
Reaction score
4,015
Location
Gilbert
Everyone wants Petzing to call 20 yard passes with a receiving group that shows no sign of getting open 20 yards down the field and an Oline that can’t hold a pocket long enough to let the receivers get that deep. This roster is just not designed to execute 20+ yard plays. You see one occasionally but not on third and long when the opponent is defending against it, it’s a bridge too far. They might try rolling Murray out and if he had time to setup, maybe it might work, but more likely he throw on the run and just floats an interception vulnerable ball.
Zero tds for our best weapon.
Running Demercado instead of Benson
Not scheming for CHJ.

Your post has nothing to do with the above.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,504
Reaction score
7,740
Everyone wants Petzing to call 20 yard passes with a receiving group that shows no sign of getting open 20 yards down the field and an Oline that can’t hold a pocket long enough to let the receivers get that deep. This roster is just not designed to execute 20+ yard plays. You see one occasionally but not on third and long when the opponent is defending against it, it’s a bridge too far. They might try rolling Murray out and if he had time to setup, maybe it might work, but more likely he throw on the run and just floats an interception vulnerable ball.
I think the problem is there are very few plays made over the middle in the 10-15 yard range. Kyler tried one last week and it was picked. He's not good at that. Everything is underneath, on the sidelines for an 8-10 yard out, or a Murray heave and hope deep ball.
Good offenses utilize the middle of the field.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,000
Reaction score
58,833
Location
SoCal
If nothing else ya kinda gotta admire self confidence
I’ve always had an extensive vocabulary (that’s what you get when you grow up as a voracious reader, thanks mom and dad!), so I almost always assume I’m in the right when it comes to word choice. But, sometimes I get tripped up (damn tech). To be honest, I tried to reproduce that just now and I don’t even know I did it the first time! Words - great. Tech - not so much.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,402
Reaction score
16,626
Location
Modesto, California
I’ve always had an extensive vocabulary (that’s what you get when you grow up as a voracious reader, thanks mom and dad!), so I almost always assume I’m in the right when it comes to word choice. But, sometimes I get tripped up (damn tech). To be honest, I tried to reproduce that just now and I don’t even know I did it the first time! Words - great. Tech - not so much.
I understand as I have always had the same issue. Though over the years I have learned to streamline my speech for mass consumption. But I love being a word nerd. when I was 7 or so I used to read the dictionary on the dumper. It started because my dad remodeled the bathroom and I could not reach all the shampoo bottles and such.
 

Morty

Veteran
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Posts
132
Reaction score
106
Location
MN
With no deep receiving threat and a mediocre middle of the Oline it would be hard for any QB to look great. That said Murray still lacks composure and that second interception was a rookie mistake. I still think he’s good enough to win with but the coaching needs to be more demanding. It was one thing to speak highly of Murray as Gannon did while taking over. It’s quite another to tolerate a lack of presence and leadership. Time to start pressuring Murray if Murray wants the job. I’m bringing in a veteran backup next season and adding an ultimatum. Murray either seizes the job or moves on.
Harry - great point and analysis of a very complicated moving object. PFF does have our line rated fairly high which is encouraging. And sometimes Murray does pass they eye test in the pocket. But other times as been mentioned many times, he looks out of control and throws off his back foot. Hopefully, next year the line will continue to improve. Giving Murray the opportunity to continue growing in the pocket. He has shown some improvement this year. Do you see more chances for improvement for the offense or defense next year? Any thoughts on what QB could push Murray?
 

tennis-player

Veteran
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Posts
296
Reaction score
602
Location
Phoenix
Harry - great point and analysis of a very complicated moving object. PFF does have our line rated fairly high which is encouraging. And sometimes Murray does pass they eye test in the pocket. But other times as been mentioned many times, he looks out of control and throws off his back foot. Hopefully, next year the line will continue to improve. Giving Murray the opportunity to continue growing in the pocket. He has shown some improvement this year. Do you see more chances for improvement for the offense or defense next year? Any thoughts on what QB could push Murray?
You are hoping for that next year Murray will grow in the pocket and improve? This is year number six.
 

Morty

Veteran
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Posts
132
Reaction score
106
Location
MN
You are hoping for that next year Murray will grow in the pocket and improve? This is year number six.
Hey Tennis player (I too like tennis), yes I'm hoping as most likely he will be back. I'm hoping an improved line could keep Kyler from getting rattled as much. Year six with the team but really he has just over 1 year with this coaching staff. I'm also hoping the defense will continue to improve. Do you think they can find a replacement for him?
 

tennis-player

Veteran
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Posts
296
Reaction score
602
Location
Phoenix
Hey Tennis player (I too like tennis), yes I'm hoping as most likely he will be back. I'm hoping an improved line could keep Kyler from getting rattled as much. Year six with the team but really he has just over 1 year with this coaching staff. I'm also hoping the defense will continue to improve. Do you think they can find a replacement for him?
I was hoping that this year Kyler would improve in a run based offense that does not put the pressure on him to be the hero like Kingsbury's did. I have now given up that hope. I do not think that Kyler will improve on what we see he is. I think we are stuck with him through 2025. We should sign a veteran to back him up and maybe replace him, or draft a 3rd round quarterback with the hope he can be the future.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,564
Reaction score
30,219
Location
Gilbert, AZ
This offense is really, really reliant on James Conner. He's not going to get any younger; he's only going to decline. It' boggling that we can't integrate Benson better into this.
 

Dayman

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
6,192
Reaction score
8,163
Location
Portland, Oregon
The TE screen on 3rd and long was classic Petzing.

That being said, I thought the offense actually functioned pretty well today when they stopped trying to force the ball to Marvin.
 

602 Native

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
2,000
Reaction score
4,015
Location
Gilbert
The TE screen on 3rd and long was classic Petzing.

That being said, I thought the offense actually functioned pretty well today when they stopped trying to force the ball to Marvin.

Dude calls plays like it’s the 1960s.

Feel like I’m watching the winged t offense.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,504
Reaction score
7,740
Bad thing is with the team showing marked improvement in the standings, I doubt Gannon makes any changes to the staff and I doubt anyone is hiring Petzing for HC.
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,633
Reaction score
993
Location
Needles, Ca.
What about Rallis as HC material? The script was flipped. On paper if we had any chance of winning we would have to score a lot with our offense, since it was going to be the strong side of the ball, because our paper thin defense would stop anybody this year. I'm guessing JG is getting most of the credit for our defense.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,564
Reaction score
30,219
Location
Gilbert, AZ
What about Rallis as HC material? The script was flipped. On paper if we had any chance of winning we would have to score a lot with our offense, since it was going to be the strong side of the ball, because our paper thin defense would stop anybody this year. I'm guessing JG is getting most of the credit for our defense.
Because our defense is objectively bad
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,633
Reaction score
993
Location
Needles, Ca.
I've read terms like "overachieving" and "overperforming" based on the lack of talent on the D side of the ball. That's why I ask.
 

602 Native

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
2,000
Reaction score
4,015
Location
Gilbert
No matter what we think or what we perceive, it's stats like this that will likely keep Petzing around for 2025.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

I wonder what changed from 2023 offense to 2024 offense for such a drastic turn around?
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,237
Reaction score
35,809
Location
BirdGangThing
I wonder what changed from 2023 offense to 2024 offense for such a drastic turn around?
QB1! His QBR has been at or near the top of the league all year. Not flashy, but it's obvious they wanted to see him work within the tight constraints of the offense and improve the overall efficiency.

I know the Detroit model of a rebuild has been mentioned...and I think this is something they made Goff going through, too...as he always had talent, but would make boneheaded mistakes occasionally. Once they got to year 3 and guys like St Brown were no longer rookies and were more developed, they really expanded that offense and it's continued this year. They also infused a lot more talent at that point, too. They lost a bunch of close games to better teams in year 2 (sound familiar) and were chasing a playoff spot into the final week.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,237
Reaction score
35,809
Location
BirdGangThing
If you look at yesterday's game it showed it in a nutshell. We have significantly improved on 3rd down. The game clinching drive yesterday was 4 for 4 on 3rd down.
Kyler was really good on 3rd down. The other area they drastically improved is in the RedZone.
 
Top