JeffGollin
ASFN Icon
Gist of this and other threads is that (1) we lost again and (2) someone has to be blamed.
I think this process is back-assword.
Focus should first be placed on what's causing us to lose. From there we can move on to how we can best remove or change those causes - including changing personnel if necessary.
Staying on the topic of personnel, the questions should center on: (1) who's responsible for what's causing us to lose and (2) are we likely to change what's causing us to lose by wholesale changes in existing staff or by getting existing staff to either tweak or the system or completely overhaul it?
Right now, my bias leans toward blowing up the entire offense - people, system, players the works. But I also think like Wiz's style as establisher of a sane, structured operation and culture and am leery of ripping apart elements worth keeping. The question I'd be asking is: "If not Wiz, who?" And I'd then ask: "Are you sure you want this?" Are you sure you're going to get what you want from the new guy more than from Wiz?
Maybe the answer will turn out to be a clean sweep, but I don't buy into the argument that - because Wiz doesn't perfectly fit 7 or 8 arbitrary criteria, we should sack him (because we're mad at him for losing).
I think this process is back-assword.
Focus should first be placed on what's causing us to lose. From there we can move on to how we can best remove or change those causes - including changing personnel if necessary.
Staying on the topic of personnel, the questions should center on: (1) who's responsible for what's causing us to lose and (2) are we likely to change what's causing us to lose by wholesale changes in existing staff or by getting existing staff to either tweak or the system or completely overhaul it?
Right now, my bias leans toward blowing up the entire offense - people, system, players the works. But I also think like Wiz's style as establisher of a sane, structured operation and culture and am leery of ripping apart elements worth keeping. The question I'd be asking is: "If not Wiz, who?" And I'd then ask: "Are you sure you want this?" Are you sure you're going to get what you want from the new guy more than from Wiz?
Maybe the answer will turn out to be a clean sweep, but I don't buy into the argument that - because Wiz doesn't perfectly fit 7 or 8 arbitrary criteria, we should sack him (because we're mad at him for losing).