I'll argue a Ferrari over Ford Pinto any day...
That is not a nice thing to say about Matt Stafford.
I'll argue a Ferrari over Ford Pinto any day...
That is not a nice thing to say about Matt Stafford.
Dont everyone get confused here, I LIKE MATT! I want him to succeed! It is only better for us if he does in the long run. I voted for him to start last year even though he had that terrible game against the Raiders.
I just think that the resigning of Warner to a two year deal with STARTER money in both years says a lot about what Whis thinks of Matt and his ability to hold down the position. His body of work based on his hype and draft position doesnt bode well.
But I am hopeful.
Sheesh look at the tags. Someone put "Golden Boy".
The green of jealousy is not a pretty color.
I really really really hate the tags feature. So many people use it as an excuse to take an anonymous shot at someone or something.
One of Keebali's worst additions by far.
Strange thread. Order needs to be restored. I'm in charge. (Learned to do that from General Alexander Haig)
1. cdsfanmd, you are the voice of reason here. Stop that immediately. You are ruining your reputation.
2. Mulli being Mulli. Sigh. Fixing this one is impossible. I resign.
Carry on.
Doesn't the reverse apply here, too? Why pay a backup QB so much money if you didn't think he had the chops to replace the old HoF QB that just took your team to a SB?Because a salary-cap strapped team doesnt pay a 37 year old QB 20million dollars guaranteed if they thought the cheaper "QB-of-the-future" was ready to play.
Pretty simple
saying the Cards are cap strapped is not acuurate. When free agency strarted they were way under the cap and could afford to give Warner big money. The situation would have been alot different if the Cards were up against the cap at the beginning of FA. If that was the case, i'm pretty sure the reins would have been handed over to Leinart. After the year Warner had,to think he'd be replaced with all that cap space is pretty ridiculous to use that as a testament against Leinart. I don't understand why Fitz praising Leinart would cause such a debate . Now, if he said Leinart wasn't the answer,or Leinart should be starting,then i can see a big debate. Fitz probably, just maybe, knows more than us on what Leinart can do.
Doesn't the reverse apply here, too? Why pay a backup QB so much money if you didn't think he had the chops to replace the old HoF QB that just took your team to a SB?
If the Cards didn't like Leinart you would have heard a ton of trade talk from them. The reality is that all of the trade talk came from outside the organization.
Or, they would have just cut him. They've shown they're not afraid to cut higher profile guys.
I'm in complete agreement with Shane on this. The Cards have already overpaid a QB for what he did the year before to appease the fans. It lead to 5 years of some of the worst football the NFL has ever seen.
Leinart did not play behind a pro bowl QB in 2006 or 2007. In fact Warner was so mediocre that Leinart replaced him as starter in 2006 and was the starter in 2007 until Matt broke his collarbone. In the meantime Leinart didn't do enough to keep the starting job.
Now the Cards have tied up $11.5 million cap space with a $7.5 million hit next year minimum in a 38 year old in a young man's league. I just can't see the new Cards doing that if they had faith that Leinart could step in and maintain the offense at the same level.
They can't be that short sighted can they?
For those that slam Warner...guess you weren't able to watch the games last year, huh?
Leinart has been unimpressive on the field but I've seen some real maturity in how he's handled being the #2 guy. No pouting, no demands, and total support of the team's success. And, no matter what anyone else says, maturity is a huge factor if you want a successful QB.
If Fitz says that he's got the goods, I'm inclined to believe him.
What Fitz sees in practice which is really all he has to go on of late is not really indicative of anything. Now if Q had said that it would mean something.
FTFY
I'm in complete agreement with Shane on this. The Cards have already overpaid a QB for what he did the year before to appease the fans. It lead to 5 years of some of the worst football the NFL has ever seen.
Leinart did not play behind a pro bowl QB in 2006 or 2007. In fact Warner was so mediocre that Leinart replaced him as starter in 2006 and was the starter in 2007 until Matt broke his collarbone. In the meantime Leinart didn't do enough to keep the starting job.
Now the Cards have tied up $11.5 million cap space with a $7.5 million hit next year minimum in a 38 year old in a young man's league. I just can't see the new Cards doing that if they had faith that Leinart could step in and maintain the offense at the same level.
They can't be that short sighted can they?
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Pretty simple only explains one thing and that is you. I guess I shouldn't expect much from someone who has Pat freaking White on his avatar. Why don't you go cheer for Miami?
There is so much wrong with your statement I don't even know where to start. First a salary cap strapped team? We are up against the cap BECAUSE we gave Kurt a 2 year contract. You know the same QB who led us to the freaking Super Bowl, was the Pro Bowl starter and almost MVP? How does it even make sense to let him leave....for salary cap reasons? What a joke.
Young Peyton Manning could have been sitting on the bench and there is NO WAY they would be able to let Kurt walk from both a PR, team, and football stand point. You can't let someone who hasn't established himself take the job when a guy who just took you two minutes away from a SB win and was the primary reason for it can still play and wants to continue to play for the team.
I don't even know why I take the time to respond to posters like yourself. Its obvious you just don't get it and no matter how slowly I or anyone else breaks it down for you thats not going to change.
Believe what you want but when Matt is starting and succeeding for this team don't try to get on the bandwagon then. I won't let you on.
I consider myself a realist. Yes I like Matt and think he will be good. And yes I am excited by what I have seen up until this point. He has question marks but most young QB's do. And we haven't really seen enough to say definitely one way or the other.
What more do you want Cardinal fan?
I disagree. I don't think it's a "fact" at all. It's your opinion. I'd argue that he's not playing and warner's new contract is less about Leinart and more about Warner. I don't think you're giving Warner enough credit.3. HE ISNT READY TO PLAY RIGHT NOW AS WITNESSED BY WARNERS NEW CONTRACT! Why do you feel like that statement is so damning? Jesus, it is the truth.