For those of you that say lose out for a better draft pick ...

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,924
You know I'm not talking about Manning. Who IMO is far from an exciting or great "franchise" QB. Regardless of his SB victory.

I will take Larry over Manning all day everyday.

Whoa whoa whoa. Larry Fitzgerald or Peyton Manning, and you take Larry?

Larry might be my favorite athlete of all time, but this is crazy.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,456
Reaction score
40,032
Location
Las Vegas
(excluding Leinart as we all know that cutting him was a mistake)

You can't exclude him. He was the light at the end of the tunnel and he just wasn't a franchise QB. Regardless of whether or not cutting him was a mistake.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
We haven't bad enough to get a franchise QB. (excluding Leinart as we all know that cutting him was a mistake)
Including Leinart. He would have been a stop gap. Not a franchise. Definitely not on par with E. Manning or Rivers. NEver.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,669
Location
CA
If Cards drafted Eli, Not only would the team NOT have Fitz, they wouldn't have gotte Warner either. IMO, I thank the stars for Josh McCown and Nate Pool, for they put into the motion the framework for the team's only Superbowl appearance.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,924
You can't exclude him. He was the light at the end of the tunnel and he just wasn't a franchise QB. Regardless of whether or not cutting him was a mistake.

Fine. If you want to include him... you thank your lucky stars if you can draft a franchise changing QB without having a top 5 pick.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,456
Reaction score
40,032
Location
Las Vegas
If Cards drafted Eli, Not only would the team NOT have Fitz, they wouldn't have gotte Warner either. IMO, I thank the stars for Josh McCown and Nate Pool, for they put into the motion the framework for the team's only Superbowl appearance.

Good solid case.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
I would take Peyton all day and twice on sunday over anyone including Q :D
Tom Brady.
iwin.gif
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I would take Peyton all day and twice on sunday over anyone including Q :D

You know if the Cards hadn't won a meaningless game against Atlanta the last week of the 1997 season they might have had Peyton Manning.

But the Bears did a better job of Cardinaling the draft that year. They won two of their last 3 to finish 4-12 while Indy was at 3-13.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
He will be better than Tom Brady :)

Quit jinxing guys will you. You already sent Daryl Washington to the bench and it was only the incessant complaining from the rest of us on ASFN that got him back out on the field.

:p
 

chickenhead

Registered User
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
3,109
Reaction score
77
It's fun to talk about on a message board, but landing the number one pick takes a lot of help from other teams and is unpredictable enough to not even warrant thinking about as a strategy unless you have double digit losses and only one or two wins, IMO. Even if the Cards had lost yesterday, the Benglas and Panthers would still be sitting below them, and the Bills and Lions would still be tied with them. Even if the Cards lost yesterday and to the Panthers next week, the Panthers would still have the inside track. The Bengals play San Diego and at Baltimore in the last two weeks.

That's just too many teams you need help from. Regardless of what pick we end up with, there are existing players on this team who need improvement now. No sense in sacrificing real progress for an illusory goal of ineptitude. I'm cheering for the other bottom-feeders ever week, too. But I think the team itself should focus on the pick they ultimately earn.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,456
Reaction score
40,032
Location
Las Vegas
Quit jinxing guys will you. You already sent Daryl Washington to the bench and it was only the incessant complaining from the rest of us on ASFN that got him back out on the field.

:p

:D
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
It's fun to talk about on a message board, but landing the number one pick takes a lot of help from other teams and is unpredictable enough to not even warrant thinking about as a strategy unless you have double digit losses and only one or two wins, IMO. Even if the Cards had lost yesterday, the Benglas and Panthers would still be sitting below them, and the Bills and Lions would still be tied with them. Even if the Cards lost yesterday and to the Panthers next week, the Panthers would still have the inside track. The Bengals play San Diego and at Baltimore in the last two weeks.

That's just too many teams you need help from. Regardless of what pick we end up with, there are existing players on this team who need improvement now. No sense in sacrificing real progress for an illusory goal of ineptitude. I'm cheering for the other bottom-feeders ever week, too. But I think the team itself should focus on the pick they ultimately earn.

I think it was Earthsci who pointed out that if you go back and look at the drafts for the last 20 years you can't find a single instance where winning a late season game cost the Cards anything in the draft.

And since they have made an art form of picking the wrong guy in the first round it's probably better that the Cards FO never has the #1 overall.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,047
Reaction score
58,938
Location
SoCal
And since they have made an art form of picking the wrong guy in the first round it's probably better that the Cards FO never has the #1 overall.

there is that. if we had a choice of a levi brown-type or andrew luck, i'd bet we go with levi brown. sigh. maybe the cards are saving us from even greater heartbreak.
 

earthsci

That Rapscallion!!
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
8,300
Reaction score
1
Location
Phoenix
that's possible. so we end up with rivers? i'm okay with that.
Or we could have just won the game like we did and draft Phillip Rivers. He's better than Manning. We weren't going to draft a QB that year anyway.
 
Last edited:

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
there is that. if we had a choice of a levi brown-type or andrew luck, i'd bet we go with levi brown. sigh. maybe the cards are saving us from even greater heartbreak.

Heck even when we do make a good move like taking Andre Wadsworth or David Boston it doesn't work out. If the Cards were to somehow get Andrew Luck he'd turn out to be Ryan Leaf II
 

DeAnna

Just A Face in The Crowd
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Posts
7,284
Reaction score
769
Location
Goodyear, AZ
... I say kiss my arse! There is NOTHING better than winning a game at home, especially after a seven game skid. It was soooo nice to walk out of the stadium a winner today and not have the opposing fans taunt me and other fans.

Thank you, Cardinals!!! Damn the draft pick!!!!

Hear, hear!! :moon:

All those elite draft picks through out the years never really did them much good, did they?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,067
Posts
5,431,368
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top