Errntknght
Registered User
I don't think so either, even though one has to be blind to not see it. Your best point guard should play point and your best shooting guard should play the two. They can both be "combos" but their roles need to be defined.
Hornacek's problem was that Goran was the better playmaker and also the better spot shooter while Bledsoe was head and shoulders above him defending either position. He wanted to have them both on the floor so as to have two outlet targets for the fastbreak, so he had to compromise somewhere. He elected to have Dragic in the primary role of spot up shooter and Bled driving to the hoop - he could actually drive better than Goran, he was just much more limited once he got there.
The fast break was pretty good (it helped that Ish could also run it) and the pair did okay in the half court but I thought the halfcourt offense could be much better if Jeff had them both active and playing off each other - in the sense of having defined plays where they both handled the ball, or it was an option at the least. His overall approach was better suited to having one real PG and a good ball handler at the 2 - the actual setup in his playing days.
A bigger problem arose this year, seemingly due to adding a third combo guard in IT - but I think it was more that he couldn't sell his concept (perhaps he didn't have one) to his players and great unhappiness ensued.
You're right that he didn't maximize Goran's effectiveness but that was never his goal - and it shouldn't be a coach's primary goal unless the guy is an otherworldly talent who can carry the entire team if you keep him happy enough. Goran was good and also loveable but he wasn't that level of a talent.
How about giving it a rest, its in the past...