Harry Personal Update

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,799
Reaction score
25,774
Location
Orlando, FL
Thanks for the concern. While I am in an endangered group (tight end size for my era); I’m safe. I’ve gotten a couple of concerned emails from back when that email info was public. I thought I’d better comment.

I also did get a note from a guy who writes at The Athletic who asked about my earlier post that covered the likely demise of college football or at least force spring football. I think that was one of the threads that disappeared. It was back in Feb/March and he wanted to know my source. I don’t give out those. I guess they got it much later.

Beyond that the CB issue is a disaster. Especially because I think it’s a marginal draft pool for 2021. Most of the recent quality studies indicate the secondary is more important than the pass rush in controlling the passing game. Seattle certainly believes that. I wouldn’t shift Murphy again. He was overmatched but might be decent in slot coverage. I think Simmons can solve the TE problem.

I’m hoping a camp cut might help. The recent signing of Crawley is unlikely to do so. That this is still a problem is disappointing. It’s always seemed to me that players with a bad injury history usually repeat that more often than fully recover. Especially at hard-to-replace positions (T & CB) more depth would have seemed indicated. They may get by at RT, but I think there will be a price to pay at CB. The West is a passing group. You just can’t hide that hole.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,982
Location
UK
I think they are yin and yang. Balance of both is important.

The NFL GMs think its pass rush which is why top edge guys are getting 25m and top CBs are getting 16m.
 

wit3card

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Posts
2,948
Reaction score
1,782
Alford was a bad signing in handsight, maybe they should have traded for a CB or sign one, but now I hope they don't pay him any further than this season.

Maybe a cut or a trade can solve the prbolem, but not much there at the moment.
 

tnmike

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Posts
1,397
Reaction score
1,535
Location
Nashville, TN
Alford was a bad signing in handsight, maybe they should have traded for a CB or sign one, but now I hope they don't pay him any further than this season.

Maybe a cut or a trade can solve the prbolem, but not much there at the moment.
The prbolem is pretty evident
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,297
Location
Colorado
Alford was a bad signing in handsight, maybe they should have traded for a CB or sign one, but now I hope they don't pay him any further than this season.

Maybe a cut or a trade can solve the prbolem, but not much there at the moment.
Alford was a bad signing at the time. Instead of being awful on the field he instead just never made it onto it. No hindsight needed here.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,982
Location
UK
Supply and demand

CB's are in short supply too. Especially very good ones. Top tier lock down corners like Sherman, P2 etc are more rare than 15 sack guys I reckon. At the very least I don't think there is more supply than good Edge guys.

Not helped by some poor recent draft classes. Lattimore in '17 is probably the last very good CB to come out. Where as there seems to be a Bosa, Josh Allen, Bradley Chubb or Chase Young most years.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,163
Reaction score
31,685
Location
Scottsdale, Az
I think that was one of the threads that disappeared. It was back in Feb/March and he wanted to know my source. I don’t give out those. I guess they got it much later.

You have been told repeatedly where your thread was moved to, why it was moved there, and how to access it.
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,799
Reaction score
25,774
Location
Orlando, FL
You have been told repeatedly where your thread was moved to, why it was moved there, and how to access it.
Frankly this sort of response is tiring. If you read my post carefully he wasn’t asking where the thread went. I just mentioned it had been moved for the benefit of others who might want to see what was said. I am not here to direct traffic on the site. A better observation might be why a post that talked about why college and even high school sports would likely be impacted was moved from a discussion about sports. That subject has subsequently been taken up by virtually every sports site. The impact on the 2021 draft was foreshadowed by the post. If the site still did articles that’s where I would have put it. That some responders decided to use the post to deal with non-sports political issues would be a topic to take up with those posters. I will admit to responding to some of them when I believed they were espousing ideas that could be harmful or dangerous to readers. Try to find a sports publication that doesn’t talk about Covid-19 on the front page. The topic was just ahead of its time. To believe you could insulate sports from this insidious virus is illusionary.
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,799
Reaction score
25,774
Location
Orlando, FL

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,163
Reaction score
31,685
Location
Scottsdale, Az
There is a single thread where you can discuss COVID in regards to the NFL as much as you want. Its pinned at the top of the forum
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,596
Posts
5,408,563
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top