How legit are we? Will Niners game answer that question?

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
Let's face it, we have played two stiffs so far. Niners aren't the Seahawks, but are at least competitive and in our own division. Will beating the Niners be making any statement really? Will losing to them at home expose us as not being a true contender yet?

It is nice we get some warm up or tune up games right off the bat. But to me it hasn't shown much as far as how good we are or not. We need to, and should, really kick ass the first half of the season, for the second half is where we will earn our place as an elite '15 team.

Evaluation of 2-0 teams per ESPN
 
Last edited:

Dude

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Posts
5,976
Reaction score
1,190
Location
OR.
Let's face it, we have played two stiffs so far. Niners aren't the Seahawks, but are at least competitive and in our own division. Will beating the Niners be making any statement really? Will losing to them at home expose us as not being a true contender yet?

It is nice we get some warm up or tune up games right off the bat. But to me it hasn't shown much as far as how good we are or not. We need to, and should, really kick ass the first half of the season, for the second half is where we will earn our place as an elite '15 team.

Evaluation of 2-0 teams per ESPN

11-5 with all we lost last year. 2-0 to start this season. Soon to be 3-0. Yes we have a good team. ESPN will call it a big game if we lose. If we win ESPN and some of our own fans will just say we beat another bad team. That's fine.
 

iRobot

Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2013
Posts
489
Reaction score
64
Location
Nashville, TN
Honestly until we play the Steelers, I don't think any one is going to say we're truly "LEGIT" against the teams before that. I don't think its right, but it's the truth.
 

Redneck Voodoo

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Posts
2,178
Reaction score
855
11-5 with all we lost last year. 2-0 to start this season. Soon to be 3-0. Yes we have a good team. ESPN will call it a big game if we lose. If we win ESPN and some of our own fans will just say we beat another bad team. That's fine.

So far, our wins have been decisive, bad teams or no. Last year we won 11 but most by a small margin. I don't expect a blowout but if we don't win at home against an inferior 49er's team it could make some pundit's questions legitimate. I think we win by double digits.

For me, containing Carlos Hyde is the key and I think we will.
 

Cardsfanstl

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Posts
3,239
Reaction score
786
Location
St. Louis
I for one am not taking anything for granted in any NFL game. 49'rs looked good at home against Minnesota but looked bad in the first half against the Steelers. Played even with the Steelers in the second half though. Since this is a divisional game the niners will be fired up.
 

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,236
Location
Arizona
10-6
11-5
2-0

And fans are still questioning whether these Cardinals are legit...

Are we going to go undefeated and win the superbowl? Probably not, but I think we're past the point of literally questioning whether this is all some kind of sham. lol
 

jbeecham

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
6,250
Reaction score
583
Location
Phoenix, AZ
1) The Bears are 0-2, but they played the Packers close (31-23) in week 1 & then looked good against us until Cutler got hurt. I don't think they're nearly as horrible as the national media makes them out to be (worst team in some power rankings). The truth about them is that they've played 2 of the best teams in the NFL & lost... if they had lost to the Titans & Jaguars or any of the other perennial bottom feeders then I'd agree that they're bad.

2) Teams usually play better in the disrespected underdog role so I've got no problem with national media "experts" counting us out every week. I hope they do it all season long & the Cards use it as extra motivation.

3) The Steelers are probably the 1st team we will play that will finish the season with a winning record & should be in the playoffs so that game could be a great test of just how good our team really is. We need to take care of business every week though against all of these teams that we are supposed to beat for that Steelers game to be important.

4) Every game is winnable for us. I know that's probably weird to hear as Cardinal fans, but it's true. I expect us to win every week. Obviously the tough games are still the Steelers, Seahawks x2, Packers & maybe the Bengals, but I like our chances against them.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,481
Reaction score
71,167
in the eyes of the media, the only way this game will saying anything is that we're NOT legit if we lose. Otherwise, people will continue to say jury's out as far as being a Super Bowl contender beating another bad team.

that said, if we PUMMEL the Niners, I'm gonna start feeling even better about our chances.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,566
Reaction score
40,372
Honestly until we play the Steelers, I don't think any one is going to say we're truly "LEGIT" against the teams before that. I don't think its right, but it's the truth.

Exactly. if we lose we were overrated, if we win, SF's not that good the Steelers hammered them.

Until we play someone everyone thinks is good, not going to matter, and my guess is Pitt is the first team everyone thinks is good, on our schedule.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,669
Location
CA
Nope, because every team Cards will have beaten will have 2+ losses in the first 3 weeks. If Cards build a record of say, 5-1 to start have season and then lose to a contender they'll say,"We knew they weren't as good as their record..."

They just ignore that Cards went:

10-6, then 11-5, then 3-0...
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,669
Location
CA
Cards have only had 23 winning seasons in their entire history, with 4 coming in the past 7 seasons.

This franchise has turned the corner...
 

ARZCardinals

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
4,151
Reaction score
699
Location
Behind you
Not worried about national press as others state...any real fan of the NFL will tell you "The Arizona Cardinals are a TOP team!"
There isn't a fan in the NFL of another team that's going to play us and say, "That's a W!" before the game starts.
Is this game a big one? They all are! It's one more step towards the ring!
This is the first year I've ever said and meant it "The Cardinals can WIN the Super Bowl this year!"
 

fatosber

Veteran
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
378
Reaction score
36
This question has been asked time and time again for about two seasons now. Haters will hate but the facts speak best.

We are a legit borderline contender. Our defense is arguably top 5 in the league, passing game is arguably top 10; and we are developing a running game (something we had none of for decades).

It all comes down to this: keep Carson Palmer healthy and in the game, and the Cardinals are a SupeBowl caliber team. ESPN can say whatever they want


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

BillsCarnage

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
5,827
Reaction score
1,197
Location
The Flip Side
The Cards should be 4-0 when they start the middle part of the schedule. It's going to be tough, but if the Cards can keep improving their line play - more on the D side than O side - I can see them making the SB.

There are 4-6 teams that are true SB contenders and the Cards are one of them. NE, Pitt, KC, GB, Cards and Seattle. Another team or two might jump in and someone might fall, but going into the season those are the six i had penciled in.
 

Shaggy

Site Owner Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Posts
9,050
Reaction score
2,993
Location
Arizona
ESPN - We wrote before the season that the Cardinals were the strongest candidate of any team to decline in 2015. Oops.

Why would anyone think they were going to decline? Even if I wasn't a Cards fan, I wouldn't have thought they were going to decline this year. Maybe a little on D, but the overall team, no way. Oops is right ESPN..

I get that there are alot of "I don't knows" but they dominated both NO and Chicago, which a good team will do to crappy ones. If they barely won each game, I would be thinking the same thing. Yes, SF will be a game where we can really see who this team really is, but come on, they have all the tools to kill teams on offense. They have the tools on D also with a few missing parts, but manageable. Players are stepping up and they will continue to step up. I'm just as excited for this team this year as I was last year. I thought the had a great chance to make the SB last year, and I think they have another chance this year. Just stay healthy!!!
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
ESPN - We wrote before the season that the Cardinals were the strongest candidate of any team to decline in 2015. Oops.

Why would anyone think they were going to decline? Even if I wasn't a Cards fan, I wouldn't have thought they were going to decline this year. Maybe a little on D, but the overall team, no way. Oops is right ESPN..

That is an analytics person doing what they do. Crunching numbers without watching games. The Cardinals won a statistically significant number of close games over what the law of averages says they should win. So if they were a statistical anomaly last year, reason would dictate that they return to the norm this year. Add that to a team that looked poor against Carolina in the playoffs, and you get the impression that they over performed last season.

(Except they aren't accounting for injuries playing a role in those close wins)
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,523
Reaction score
24,436
The Cards should be 4-0 when they start the middle part of the schedule. It's going to be tough, but if the Cards can keep improving their line play - more on the D side than O side - I can see them making the SB.

There are 4-6 teams that are true SB contenders and the Cards are one of them. NE, Pitt, KC, GB, Cards and Seattle. Another team or two might jump in and someone might fall, but going into the season those are the six i had penciled in.

An Alex Smith-led team is not a SB contender.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,566
Reaction score
40,372
ESPN - We wrote before the season that the Cardinals were the strongest candidate of any team to decline in 2015. Oops.

Why would anyone think they were going to decline? Even if I wasn't a Cards fan, I wouldn't have thought they were going to decline this year. Maybe a little on D, but the overall team, no way. Oops is right ESPN..

I get that there are alot of "I don't knows" but they dominated both NO and Chicago, which a good team will do to crappy ones. If they barely won each game, I would be thinking the same thing. Yes, SF will be a game where we can really see who this team really is, but come on, they have all the tools to kill teams on offense. They have the tools on D also with a few missing parts, but manageable. Players are stepping up and they will continue to step up. I'm just as excited for this team this year as I was last year. I thought the had a great chance to make the SB last year, and I think they have another chance this year. Just stay healthy!!!


IT's a Bill James type stat approach that K9 mentioned before. Generally speaking teams that win a high percentage of close games one year won't repeat that the next. They were assuming that would be the case with us.

It may still be of course but the difference as people pointed out is with Palmer we weren't winnning lots of close games, the average margin was pretty decent, it was more the games without him that were either close wins or losses that impacted that stat.

I don't think we have a top 5 defense right now. if D Wash were reinstated, in shape, and played like he can, the defense might move up several notches but I don't expect him to be reinstated anytime soon and if he is, I don't think he'll step right in and be his normal self. For the D to be top 5 the LB's have to get better, and that probably means anything at all from Weatherspoon and more consistency from Minter etc.

I think the secondary is pretty good, I think the DL is good against the run, we need improved LB play.

I don't see us getting to top 5 defense this year, probably not even top 10. I do think we can be a top 5 offense if Palmer stays healthy and the OL continues to improve.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,481
Reaction score
71,167
IT's a Bill James type stat approach that K9 mentioned before. Generally speaking teams that win a high percentage of close games one year won't repeat that the next. They were assuming that would be the case with us.

It may still be of course but the difference as people pointed out is with Palmer we weren't winnning lots of close games, the average margin was pretty decent, it was more the games without him that were either close wins or losses that impacted that stat.

I don't think we have a top 5 defense right now. if D Wash were reinstated, in shape, and played like he can, the defense might move up several notches but I don't expect him to be reinstated anytime soon and if he is, I don't think he'll step right in and be his normal self. For the D to be top 5 the LB's have to get better, and that probably means anything at all from Weatherspoon and more consistency from Minter etc.

I think the secondary is pretty good, I think the DL is good against the run, we need improved LB play.

I don't see us getting to top 5 defense this year, probably not even top 10. I do think we can be a top 5 offense if Palmer stays healthy and the OL continues to improve.

agree with all of this.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,994
Reaction score
31,259
Location
Gilbert, AZ
IT's a Bill James type stat approach that K9 mentioned before. Generally speaking teams that win a high percentage of close games one year won't repeat that the next. They were assuming that would be the case with us.

It may still be of course but the difference as people pointed out is with Palmer we weren't winnning lots of close games, the average margin was pretty decent, it was more the games without him that were either close wins or losses that impacted that stat.

I don't think we have a top 5 defense right now. if D Wash were reinstated, in shape, and played like he can, the defense might move up several notches but I don't expect him to be reinstated anytime soon and if he is, I don't think he'll step right in and be his normal self. For the D to be top 5 the LB's have to get better, and that probably means anything at all from Weatherspoon and more consistency from Minter etc.

I think the secondary is pretty good, I think the DL is good against the run, we need improved LB play.

I don't see us getting to top 5 defense this year, probably not even top 10. I do think we can be a top 5 offense if Palmer stays healthy and the OL continues to improve.

I agree with all of this. If we're between 8-12 in total defense (we're 11th in points and 22nd in yards right now) and 5-11 in total offense (1st in points 10th in yards), this is going to be a pretty good team in this division.

I think we'll know in a couple of weeks whether the AFC North is good — I'm not convinced that Baltimore or Cincy are — and the NFC North smells pretty ripe after Green Bay, but that game might not matter for either team when we get to the end of the year.

Or it could be for home-field advantage throughout the playoffs.

:stick:
 
Top