My basic point was that it's not like he had this amazing QB and had a terrible offense. Yes their team record wasn't good, but it's not because he didn't run a very good offense with that very good QB (Mahomes).
A lot of people give Kliff a pass imo.
1. He didn't run his offense in preseason
2. He's practically learning on the fly what can and what can't work in the NFL.
3. This leads to no real identity on offense.
4. We're at our best when Kyler is running no huddle.
As someone who watched A LOT of Texas Tech games.
The question is simply is Kyler dynamic enough to overcome Kliff's shortcomings/growing pains.
Cause thats where his real success stems from. Kyler is not Russell Wilson in terms of making magic happen behind the los and throwing those scramble passes. He's not Mahomes who can be in trouble and heave a prayer in the right spot. He wasn't what Manziel did to get Kliff his job. Just making crazy plays with no real rhyme or reason.
Instead he's a rhythmic passer who paired with a great play caller can be electric.
He was the 4th best play caller in the Big 12 last year.
I'm optimistic for Kliff because I do believe he'll work to get better. However, his learning curve is steeper than Kyler's right now.
Kyler would be a Raider right now if it wasn't for Kliff though. So they are tied together.
Kyler hasn't played well at all the last two games. Rams destroyed Wilson and the Seahawks and the Steelers have a great defense as well (picked off Lamar 3 times)
I think Kliff is a solid play caller with not a lot of great talent around him either. Both would have benefitted with a better draft/free agency.