Isnt there some credence to the fact that in every playoff series EVER, Marion is always asked to guard the opponents best player, and THAT might be way his offensive stats take a hit?
Not really. It's because his offensive game isn't built for the playoffs.
And yes, he draws tough defensive assignments, but it's not like he does particularly well with them. He just gets all of the attention because (a) he asks for it and (b) he's usually attempting to cover for one of the team's two
major defensive shortcomings, those being Nash and the compulsion toward small-ball.
If Marion were on a competent, balanced defensive team, no one would say anything about his defense. It would be "fine." But since the Suns have no one who can guard PGs and almost no one who can guard big men, Marion gets pressed into service, and everyone's supposed to sing his praises for being merely competent.
I thought Marion was awesome this post season, and it was mainly becasue he was defending like a champ and was around EVERY loose ball.
Marion was fine this postseason. I wish he would have guarded Parker a little more tightly, the way he did in Game 2 (only), but he was fine. He hit more than his share of threes and kept himself on the floor.
It's the chemistry problem that requires something to be done, not Marion in particular.
Did Marion get the credit for tipping Nash's 3 point miss back to Nash?
I swear this argument cracks me up. It's like Marion's the only player in the NBA who ever got a critical offensive rebound. Who tipped the ball to Paxson in 1993? No one remembers. Who tipped the ball to Horry against the Kings a few years ago? Again, no one remembers. Should we go on a tirade about those poor neglected heroes too?