- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 88,132
- Reaction score
- 39,708
Yah James Harden is a terrible defender:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63TDVWnZ5K8
Arguing Eric Gordon is a better all around player than Harden is crazy talk. Harden handles the ball better, passes much better, defends much much better, rebounds better, is bigger, etc.
I'd say Gordon is a better pure shooter, but their career FG and 3PT% are nearly identical, 45% FG & 37% 3PT for Gordon, 44% FG & 37% 3PT for Harden. So even in that area, the difference isn't large.
Eric Gordon's career defense rating is 113 and has a Defensive win share of 2.9. Hardens numbers are 106 and 6.4, respectively (by the by, Hardens offensive win shares are better too).
harden is better right now because he's coming off his best year and Gordon is coming off an injury year.
Gordon's last full year he had .5 APG better than Harden. Harden is a better rebounder and he handles the ball better but it's not like Gordon had Durant to feed the ball too (he was with the Clips that year) to rack up assists.
Comparing their FG% is unfair because Gordon has been playing with Eric Bledsoe or last year Bellinelli or Greivis Vazquez as the PG. Look at who Gordon has played with before they got Griffin the leading scorers for the Clips were Randolph one year and Kaman the next. Griffin had his big year and not surprising at all, Gordon's PPG went up 6 full points. Lot easier to play with Durant and Westbrook than Kaman and Bledsoe.
I think today Harden is better, Gordon had an injury plagued year. I don't think Harden is dramatically better though, just in a much better situation.