Does anyone think AZ would be an easier sell to Cousins, if BA hadn't retired?
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
With BA's style and limited protection for the QB? Nope.
Does anyone think AZ would be an easier sell to Cousins, if BA hadn't retired?
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Actually, no. BA was very close to retirement anyways. I think one of the main appeals to the Vikings and Cardinals over the other suitors is that our front office and coaching staff aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Kirk can be comfortable in knowing that a year from now, he's not going to be proving himself to an entirely different regime that is bringing in an offense he doesn't want to learn.Does anyone think AZ would be an easier sell to Cousins, if BA hadn't retired?
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Not quite sure money is the issue if it’s true ARZ is planning to make huge offer. It’s about who has the best chance of winning now IMO it’s MIN or DEN.If I am reading reading tea leaves correctly, vikings and cousins are at a death stare.
1. It has emerged that Vikings are the favorites to land Cousins over the last fortnight. There is mutual interest there.
2. Enter March 12, 2 days before signing, Cousins in good bye letter puts jets ahead of vikings in letter tag
3. An hour latter word emerges that Vikings put a word out to Brees's agent Tom Condon
4. An hour later, Cousins camp sells the idea Cardinals are strongly in the mix by citing a strong family connection.
Vikings and Cousins are both waiting for the other to blink on asking price. In short, like Andy Reid, Cardinals are just fodder. They have little to no chance at Cousins
Maybe they’re kissin’ Cousins.This is Arizona, not Alabama
Curious why many people seem to think that Denver would have a better chance of winning immediately with Cousins than Arizona?It’s about who has the best chance of winning now IMO it’s MIN or DEN.
Not quite sure money is the issue if it’s true ARZ is planning to make huge offer. It’s about who has the best chance of winning now IMO it’s MIN or DEN.
Demaryius Thomas and Emmanuel Sanders are a good start. The Broncos can add a back or two in the draft and give themselves 80% of the production of David Johnson.Curious why many people seem to think that Denver would have a better chance of winning immediately with Cousins than Arizona?
...dbs
Curious why many people seem to think that Denver would have a better chance of winning immediately with Cousins than Arizona?
...dbs
According to The Denver Channel’s Troy Renck, wide receiver Demaryius Thomas has a wrinkle in his contract where he could end up being a free agent this offseason.
Thomas’ contract contains a $4 million option bonus due by the last day of the league year on March 14. If the Broncos decline to exercise it, the final two seasons of Thomas’ contracts are voided, making him a free agent. The dead money makes this interesting. It would be $4.4 million less a $1.33 million cap charge already absorbed for one-third of the bonus.
Translation: the dead cap money would be $3.07 million.
"We want to have them come back and play the way they're capable of,'' Elway said. "They still have a lot of football and still (are) a top receiving pair in the league, so we have got high expectations, but they've got to come back and play a lot better.''
They had those guys last year and were 5-11. Meanwhile, relative to last year, the Cardinals will be "adding" a guy with 100% of the production of David Johnson.Demaryius Thomas and Emmanuel Sanders are a good start. The Broncos can add a back or two in the draft and give themselves 80% of the production of David Johnson.
Denver is almost identical to us. I really don't think they are any more attractive of a destination than us.
Minnesota is clearly the best team looking for a qb, and it is not close.
solid defense, good running game (draw)...a pair of experienced vet WR's...(Denver wins) History of going to and winning super bowls...(again Denver wins)Curious why many people seem to think that Denver would have a better chance of winning immediately with Cousins than Arizona?
...dbs
Denver has issues. Thomas and Sanders are both *rumored* to be on the way out. Rumor out today that Anderson is on the trading block.
Minnesota is also in a division with Green Bay which had their share of injuries like us and will be a lot stronger this season. The Lions have enough talent to throw a nice monkey wrench into the NFC North. It's not just about what you think the roster looks like, it's what it looks like in relation to your division. Even with that, only the Patriots with Tom Brady seem to have any consistency year to year... which again one must consider, the NFC version of him will be under center for Green Bay and one must discount double check the Vikings doing that well again
They just lost one of their key members of the “no fly zone.” Both WRs mentioned aren’t guaranteed money after next season, so who knows what will happen to them when their cap hits are around $30m combined(info from over the cap). Lastly, and as crazy as it seems, their oline was just as bad as ours, but I’m not sure if injuries hit them hard or not. I’d say we’re slightly better just because we went 8-8 while they went 5-11solid defense, good running game (draw)...a pair of experienced vet WR's...(Denver wins) History of going to and winning super bowls...(again Denver wins)
The new league year begins — and that bonus is paid — in two days. So... You're gonna have to provide a fresher link if you're gonna make me a believer.
They had those guys last year and were 5-11. Meanwhile, relative to last year, the Cardinals will be "adding" a guy with 100% of the production of David Johnson.
...dbs
A believer? Huh? That doesn't make much sense.
What I said was, there have been tons of articles talking about them on the way out, I just posted a couple.
Take that with Elway's 180's and there's reason to believe they might be gone sooner or later. 2018 might be it for one or both of them.
It's not something to 'believe' in. It's something to make a free agent take pause, yes.
Yes.Two years ago, we had David Johnson and Carson Palmer and went 7-8-1. Is Cousins gonna be much better than Carson Palmer this year?
Because their quarterbacks were Trevor Simian, Paxton Lynch and Brock Osweiler. For 16 games. Denver's offense was right behind ours in DVOA. Their defense was 10th and ours was 4th, which isn't nothing.
I'd guess that Denver can make an argument that Cousins is the difference between a deep playoff run and 5-11.
Two years ago, we had David Johnson and Carson Palmer and went 7-8-1. Is Cousins gonna be much better than Carson Palmer this year?
Ones from January. Nothing on their contract status since then.
Because their quarterbacks were Trevor Simian, Paxton Lynch and Brock Osweiler. For 16 games. Denver's offense was right behind ours in DVOA. Their defense was 10th and ours was 4th, which isn't nothing.
I'd guess that Denver can make an argument that Cousins is the difference between a deep playoff run and 5-11.
Two years ago, we had David Johnson and Carson Palmer and went 7-8-1. Is Cousins gonna be much better than Carson Palmer this year?
Uses the word 'hearing' to cite a source... well, whatever Artxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media