Kerr Thinks The Suns Need Defense and Rebounding

Irish

Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Posts
2,668
Reaction score
0
Location
Arizona
In an article titled "Kerr opens up on his departure, Amar'e, etc.",
it seems like Kerr has the same opinion most of the rest of us have.

(on the Suns' lineup) "They're going to have to play him (Hedo Turkoglu) at four a lot, which will compromise their rebounding and their defense. So they'll have to run a lot and they'll be good at that because (Steve) Nash is the best in the world at uptempo . I think the Suns will be good. The questions is: 'Can they be better than just good? Can they take that next step and advance in the playoffs?' That's where guys like (Hakim) Warrick and (Channing) Frye and the front line, they're going to be tested because their rebounding and defense is going to be tested because their rebounding and defense is going to be an issue."

http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/PaulCoro/92632

His comments about the failed trade with GS and Amare confirms what we had heard, but now we know.
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
Well i imagine he believes these things...i mean, he's not a part of this team or its seemingly neverending fun n gun culture anymore. Any objective observer outside of this franchise and fanbase(and a select few fans within it) knows what the problem is/has been for eons.

:deadhorse2:
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,784
Reaction score
15,887
Location
Arizona
Kerr said this:

My contract negotiations didn't go quite as I expected.

I figured sooner or later that he would finally say something about this. We heard that it was money related. We heard that Sarver asked him and others in the front office to take a pay cut. Even though he doesn't go into detail this just confirms it for me this was about Sarver not wanting to spend the money on Kerr and the front office. Contrary to all the "family" time talk we knew what this was about. I would be curious to see what the Sun's are spending on Lance Blanks compared to Kerr.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
Kerr said this:

My contract negotiations didn't go quite as I expected.

I figured sooner or later that he would finally say something about this. We heard that it was money related. We heard that Sarver asked him and others in the front office to take a pay cut. Even though he doesn't go into detail this just confirms it for me this was about Sarver not wanting to spend the money on Kerr and the front office. Contrary to all the "family" time talk we knew what this was about. I would be curious to see what the Sun's are spending on Lance Blanks compared to Kerr.

Of course it's a lot less. That's a no-brainer. The real question is, what are they now spending on Babby AND Blanks vs. Kerr? I would say a lot more. Strange that Sarver would low-ball Kerr, but re-organize his front office into a potentially more pricey unit.
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
Of course it's a lot less. That's a no-brainer. The real question is, what are they now spending on Babby AND Blanks vs. Kerr? I would say a lot more. Strange that Sarver would low-ball Kerr, but re-organize his front office into a potentially more pricey unit.
Maybe hiring 2 "yes-men" was worth the extra dollar to Mr Sarver.

Defense and rebounding dont necessarily bring in the fans,especially in this town.
Sarver knows this. Its all business.
 
Last edited:

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
Defense and rebounding? Omg what a novel approach! And to think we let this guy go. . .
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,664
Reaction score
14,993
Farmers think plants need water and sunlight.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,677
Farmers think plants need water and sunlight.

I look at this comment and the previous ones about Sarver and the Front Office and I'm pretty sure there's a fertilizer joke in there somewhere.

Steve
 

carey

VVVV Saints Fan VVVV
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Posts
2,071
Reaction score
4
Location
New Orleans
Of course it's a lot less. That's a no-brainer. The real question is, what are they now spending on Babby AND Blanks vs. Kerr? I would say a lot more. Strange that Sarver would low-ball Kerr, but re-organize his front office into a potentially more pricey unit.

That's not quite fair. Babby and Blanks are replacing Kerr AND Griffin. I bet it's comparable.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,925
Defense and rebounding? Omg what a novel approach! And to think we let this guy go. . .

If that's all you need to know....... hell Andrew could have been GM.
 
OP
OP
Irish

Irish

Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Posts
2,668
Reaction score
0
Location
Arizona
That's not quite fair. Babby and Blanks are replacing Kerr AND Griffin. I bet it's comparable.

I agree. I dout the new regime is costing as much as the old. What I don't know is how much Kerr makes with TNT compared to being a Suns GM. My interpretation of the situation is different if it is a lot more at TNT or a lot less. All I've read is speculation.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,784
Reaction score
15,887
Location
Arizona
Of course it's a lot less. That's a no-brainer. The real question is, what are they now spending on Babby AND Blanks vs. Kerr? I would say a lot more. Strange that Sarver would low-ball Kerr, but re-organize his front office into a potentially more pricey unit.

I bet when you look at the cost of Kerr/Griffith going and Babby/Blanks coming in, I will bet it's less money. Not only that but you won't have either of these guys fighting for front offices raises for the rest of the staff either.
 

binkar

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Posts
2,672
Reaction score
52
Why is everyone acting like Kerr was a phenomenal, top-of-the-line GM? His results were a mixed bag, and overall he was average at best.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
Why is everyone acting like Kerr was a phenomenal, top-of-the-line GM? His results were a mixed bag, and overall he was average at best.

+1

If you look back in Phoenix Suns fan history, you will notice that almost every person, whether it's front office or player, was better than what they presently have. It happened with Steven Hunter, Tim Thomas, Kurt Thomas (although admittedly, it's hard to argue with KT), Bryan Colangelo, Steve Kerr, David Griffin, and will most certainly happen with Amare Stoudemire and probably Leandro Barbosa. Hell, it's even happened with Lou Amundson already and he hasn't even signed with another team yet!
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
Why is everyone acting like Kerr was a phenomenal, top-of-the-line GM? His results were a mixed bag, and overall he was average at best.

From intuition I gather that some of the moves Kerr made were forced by Sarver. When you are getting overruled by your micro-managing owner your bound to take heat for moves that don't pan out. We do need some defense and rebounding, I mentioned this possibility before but I'll go back to it.

We could trade J-Rich for Okafor and shift everyone down to their natural position.

C Lopez
PF Okafor
SF Turkolu
SG Dudley or Childress
PG Nash

Bench:
Hill
Dragic
Warrick
Frye
Lawal
Childress or Dudley
Back-up C
Back-up SG
 

binkar

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Posts
2,672
Reaction score
52
From intuition I gather that some of the moves Kerr made were forced by Sarver. When you are getting overruled by your micro-managing owner your bound to take heat for moves that don't pan out. We do need some defense and rebounding, I mentioned this possibility before but I'll go back to it.

I am sure that's true. I am not even including the obvious salary dumps like KT in my assessment of the job he did. Also, although some of the moves may have been forces by Sarver, I think it's a bit unfair to say all the bad moves were Sarver, and good moves were Kerr.
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
Kerr was just another blip on the radar of the SUNS continuous culture of soft basketball.
He brought in Shaq to take a shot with a mentally burnt out and lazy 50 win roster,drafted Lopez and Dragic that took awhile to simmer and eventually cook on defense.....he brought in Matt Barnes,who couldn't shoot enough 3 pt shots for the fanbase to balance out his out of control,gritty play.....Lou was the very first Sarver afterthought when Kerr exited the building.......fine.

This team is weak.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
I am sure that's true. I am not even including the obvious salary dumps like KT in my assessment of the job he did. Also, although some of the moves may have been forces by Sarver, I think it's a bit unfair to say all the bad moves were Sarver, and good moves were Kerr.

I am not saying Kerr is responsible for the good, Sarver had to sign off on everything. I am just saying that Kerr was probably against some moves, there could have been a couple of moves he got lucky with but ultimately Sarver is running the show.
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,866
Reaction score
12,631
Location
Laveen, AZ
Of course it's a lot less. That's a no-brainer. The real question is, what are they now spending on Babby AND Blanks vs. Kerr? I would say a lot more. Strange that Sarver would low-ball Kerr, but re-organize his front office into a potentially more pricey unit.

There seemed to be a bit of that going around the NBA, most notably with the Lakers. They wanted to pay their coach less and I think it extended to front office, too. I don't know why the Lakers would be impacted, but most teams are cutting where they can because they say the economy has affected their revenues. Last year I remember some specials going on with ticket prices to get fans to go to Suns games. It's not like they are packing the house like in the Barkley days. Then it was really hard to get tickets.
 

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
+1

If you look back in Phoenix Suns fan history, you will notice that almost every person, whether it's front office or player, was better than what they presently have. It happened with Steven Hunter, Tim Thomas, Kurt Thomas (although admittedly, it's hard to argue with KT), Bryan Colangelo, Steve Kerr, David Griffin, and will most certainly happen with Amare Stoudemire and probably Leandro Barbosa. Hell, it's even happened with Lou Amundson already and he hasn't even signed with another team yet!

I'm not exactly sure what you're saying, but it sounds like you're painting with a pretty broad brush stroke.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,677
+1

If you look back in Phoenix Suns fan history, you will notice that almost every person, whether it's front office or player, was better than what they presently have. It happened with Steven Hunter, Tim Thomas, Kurt Thomas (although admittedly, it's hard to argue with KT), Bryan Colangelo, Steve Kerr, David Griffin, and will most certainly happen with Amare Stoudemire and probably Leandro Barbosa. Hell, it's even happened with Lou Amundson already and he hasn't even signed with another team yet!

That's not really unique to Phoenix Suns fans or even sports for that matter. In the army, it was often said that your best duty assignment ever was the one you were going to and the worst possible assignment was the one you just left. We all have a tendency to do this at times, to a degree, but I wouldn't say it sums up this board.

Steve
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,131
Posts
5,433,681
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top