Kidd close to being a Maverick again

Trophytown

Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Posts
206
Reaction score
0
KVH never submitted any retirement paperwork to the league. There was nothing on file with the league offices in NYC. KVH stated himself during interviews a while back that he "stepped away" from the game. So please refrain from all the skepticism of this KVH addition to this trade and base it on facts............
 

jlove

AZ Born and Bred!!!
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Posts
1,518
Reaction score
263
Location
Phoenix, AZ
With as pretty as Jamana (however you spell it) is, her and Jason sure do have some fugly kids.
 

YouJustGotSUNSD

Custom User Title!
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
5,168
Reaction score
0
Kidd aint ugly in any regard, but their kids just have these huge round heads. Shame on the wife for not passing on any hot genes.
 

jbeecham

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
6,250
Reaction score
583
Location
Phoenix, AZ
KVH never submitted any retirement paperwork to the league. There was nothing on file with the league offices in NYC. KVH stated himself during interviews a while back that he "stepped away" from the game. So please refrain from all the skepticism of this KVH addition to this trade and base it on facts............
Yes it's legal by NBA rules to include KVH in the trade because the Mavs still own his rights, but the fact that KVH has no intention of playing any basketball for NJ makes it shady. Also NJ doesn't want KVH on their team so it really is a way for the Mavs to circumvent the salary cap. I really don't have a problem with it because I think this trade makes the Mavs worse. I had a bigger problem with Aaron McKie being included in the Gasol trade and the NBA allowing that to happen then. McKie has no intentions on ever playing basketball again and was actually volunteering as an assistant coach for another NBA team.
 
Last edited:

Andrew

flamboyantly righteous!
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Posts
3,538
Reaction score
0
Location
St. Louis, MO
I think its funny people are making a big deal out of all of this. This makes the Mavericks worse in every sense, they got one less big guy for interior defense and they aren't getting past the 2nd round with Kidd against the Suns, Spurs, Lakers or even the Jazz.
 
OP
OP
A

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
Jourmama Kidd is NOT hot.
 

BeeBeard

Throw some Bees on that.
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Posts
640
Reaction score
0
With as pretty as Jamana (however you spell it) is, her and Jason sure do have some fugly kids.


Don't be fooled, Kidd's wife is as pretty as cosmetic surgery can make her.

I mean look at this. (mildly NSFW).

Boob job, nose job, face lift...yeah, not all that impressive, to be honest. The children will be put under the knife too when they're old enough, I'm sure.
 

az1965

Love Games!
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
14,760
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin, TX
So Cuban got a 34 year old much expensive point guard after not resigning a 30 year old point guard for less because he was getting to a point when body starts to break...??? Sounds like a big Oops!
 

BeeBeard

Throw some Bees on that.
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Posts
640
Reaction score
0
So Cuban got a 34 year old much expensive point guard after not resigning a 30 year old point guard for less because he was getting to a point when body starts to break...??? Sounds like a big Oops!

Oh, absolutely. I still think this is Marc Cuban trying to make up for the loss of Nash ("the one that got away") and to some smaller extent, the loss of Kidd the first time under different ownership. I love that Cuban has the guts to make deals like this. It's going to be a lot of fun watching the No-win-ski / Howard / Terry kernel gel around Kidd. And don't forget, if this trade works out well for the Mavs, then Cuban ends up looking like a supergenius. How could he resist the chance for acclaim like that? ;)
 

TheHopToad

Россия отстой!
Joined
May 29, 2006
Posts
4,019
Reaction score
231
I think Cuban relapsed back into the rich businessman's thinking with this trade. It doesn't make them a better team and compromises their future, but Kidd is a popular player in the league and will be more marketable and is a better story than Devin Harris or DeSegana Diop. File this under "bad publicity is better than no publicity".

Even though they were a better team before this deal, the Mavericks were still going nowhere in this year's Western Conference and Cuban knew it. At least people will be talking about them for a while now.
 

ShuHanGuanYu

Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Posts
119
Reaction score
0
I think Cuban relapsed back into the rich businessman's thinking with this trade. It doesn't make them a better team and compromises their future, but Kidd is a popular player in the league and will be more marketable and is a better story than Devin Harris or DeSegana Diop. File this under "bad publicity is better than no publicity".

Even though they were a better team before this deal, the Mavericks were still going nowhere in this year's Western Conference and Cuban knew it. At least people will be talking about them for a while now.

I'm not a Cuban fan, but it's clear to me that this guy just wants to win. I can't help but doubt the marketability angle. He saw what many others saw. Dallas offense was stagnant as hell. Jason Kidd seems like the sort of team leader and passer that they sorely needed out of their point guard spot.

Now, I believe the problem still lies in that they take too many jump shots and Dirk still refuses to punish players inside. They are a jump shooting team that has some slashing ability. Consistent post presence is lacking. One-on-one offense is definitely in abundance. They were at their best when Dirk was focused on improving their post play...and his favorite 20-feet-out post ups do not count.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
Did anybody see Insider today?

Says Avery lobbied hard to trade Dirk during the off season. I don't think there is any cure for the disease Dirk has. Looks Like the Little General agrees.
 

BeeBeard

Throw some Bees on that.
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Posts
640
Reaction score
0
Did anybody see Insider today?

Says Avery lobbied hard to trade Dirk during the off season. I don't think there is any cure for the disease Dirk has. Looks Like the Little General agrees.


Cuban posted on his blog today that that reporter is basically just a huge liar and that Avery Johnson never asked him to trade Dirk at all.

edit: Here's the link: http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/19/doing-the-deal-and-dishing-the-dirt/

If it were somebody different, I would be suspicious, but I'm inclined to believe Cuban on this one; Peter Vescey and everybody he uses as "sources" are pretty much always wrong.
 
Last edited:

ShuHanGuanYu

Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Posts
119
Reaction score
0
Context is important. If this is even true, think about who was available at the time. Big ticket > MVNot. Who wouldn't lobby?
 

Assface

Like a boss
Supporting Member
Joined
May 6, 2003
Posts
15,106
Reaction score
21
Location
Tempe
I've always felt the matching salaries in a trade is kinda dumb.
 

Lorenzo

Registered User
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Posts
10,426
Reaction score
5,316
Location
Vegas
I'm not a Cuban fan, but it's clear to me that this guy just wants to win. I can't help but doubt the marketability angle. He saw what many others saw. Dallas offense was stagnant as hell. Jason Kidd seems like the sort of team leader and passer that they sorely needed out of their point guard spot.

Now, I believe the problem still lies in that they take too many jump shots and Dirk still refuses to punish players inside. They are a jump shooting team that has some slashing ability. Consistent post presence is lacking. One-on-one offense is definitely in abundance. They were at their best when Dirk was focused on improving their post play...and his favorite 20-feet-out post ups do not count.
finally agree with someone. of course kidd makes the mavs better right now. the mavs want to win now and they figure they had to go after a HOF PG like kidd if he was being shopped. the guy averages a near triple double per game and brings strength to an area in which the mavs have the worst weakness. clearly the suns made a similiar decision in bringing in shaq. they looked at their weakness and addressed it. did they give up a lot......yeah. but I don't see how people can put the mavericks so far behind anyone else in the west to include phoenix or anyone else. Just look at the mavs current record vs. the west. it isn't bad. SA isn't exactly dominating and dallas has had their number somewhat anyhow. now does kidd change things.......yes but imo for the better. so that should improve their chances. as far as dirk......I agree. I think he needs to go down closer to the basket more often. but the guy is a great perimeter player. you still want him to do the things he does well. and I understand people making fun of him because he lost in the finals and got shut down by GS last year. but the guy still has as many wins as anyone in phoenix does to include nash. nash still hasn't even brought any of his high powered offensive teams out of the west. and chokewitzki managed to do it without steve.
 

YouJustGotSUNSD

Custom User Title!
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
5,168
Reaction score
0
I've always felt the matching salaries in a trade is kinda dumb.

A good way distract how silly it is to match salaries is to combine it with 40 pages of rules and regulations to make it confusing.

Because confusing and dumb is easier to mask than plain old dumb.
 

az1965

Love Games!
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
14,760
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin, TX
Kidd's name then came up almost immediately after the Mavs' Golden State debacle and became a serious option once this season started and word reached Dallas that this was Kidd's preferred destination. Remember, too, that bashing Cuban over Nash at this precise moment means doing so when he just responded to the Kidd trade featuring Stackhouse and Devean George that collapsed last Wednesday by signing off on a reconfigured Kidd deal that will cost him $11-plus million extra this season alone.
When he was inevitably questioned Tuesday about his willingness to spend today for a 34-year-old after the hard-line stance he took on Nash at 30, Cuban said: "We weren't signing [Kidd] for six years, which was the difference in the past."
But Nash was also 4 years younger at the time... I'm not sure I agree with his argument.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,055
Posts
5,431,310
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top