Wait. Yesterday you would put CB and RB even but today when just asked you put RB over CB despite us signing Conner?
That makes no sense.
He asked me which position I felt it was better to fill in the 1st round. I explained that in this particular situation, I would place RB as the priority, because of where we are, what the team needs are, and the needs of other teams. That has nothing to do with Conner. With Conner, I have given up hope or any thought of drafting an RB high.
Obviously, today the RB room is better than the CB room. It lacks high end talent and instead has two guys who are just whatever, but the CB room only has two guys that are whatever and still needs a starter.
This is nuts. There's no comparison in positional value. RB is probably the lowest value position in the game and here's why.
A DB, WR, OL, DL etc have to play at a high level every play. They are going one on one vs elite opponents and either they win the rep or the opposition do.
A CB has to on the ball every down against a WR1 or a WR2 and if not we lose a bunch of yards.
A RB doesn't have to beat anyone 1 on 1. He has no direct opponent he just has to execute the play correctly and hit the right hole. If everyone else executes their job the worst RB will get you 5 yards at least. You only need an elite RB when the play breaks down. Which is a lot less often that any other position needs to be.
An RB touches the ball more often than any position on the field besides QB or center. No other position on the field can make up for missing or poor QB play, besides kick returners, I guess. Everything else funnels through the QB.
Like it or not, you actually have to have some talent to play the position, otherwise you and I would be NFL RBs, not participants on an ornithology enthusiast bulletin board.