Let’s Take a Moment to Overreact to Kyler’s IG Page

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,007
Reaction score
23,141
He’s just saying that to scare the Packers away from keeping him. I would rather have A-Aron for the next few years age/weirdness and all.
I would have easily but seeing him fold with arguably his best all-around team ever & a team with more significantly more talent than this team just doesn’t sit right with me.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,110
Reaction score
35,506
Location
BirdGangThing
He’s just saying that to scare the Packers away from keeping him. I would rather have A-Aron for the next few years age/weirdness and all.
Kinda my thinking...3 years $150 million for Rodgers may be more productive than 5 years $200 million for Murray.
 

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
8,144
Reaction score
12,234
Location
St Louis, MO
I would have easily but seeing him fold with arguably his best all-around team ever & a team with more significantly more talent than this team just doesn’t sit right with me.
The reason for getting is Rodgers is

1. He can solve the Rams issue that Kliff seemingly cant.
2. Kliff can solve the 49ers issue that Rodgers seemingly cant.

Brady retired so we dont have to worry about that.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,411
Reaction score
18,303
Location
The Giant Toaster
I would have easily but seeing him fold with arguably his best all-around team ever & a team with more significantly more talent than this team just doesn’t sit right with me.

He chokes but I’d take a vet QB over a bunch of picks if it came to that. I don’t think this relationship between Kyler and the franchise ends well extension or not.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,701
Reaction score
23,790
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Except that I am not. If we hope to get better in the playoffs and possibly the Superbowl, we need to accomplish what I said. Kyler's immaturity is not what is holding us from the being successful.
Dude, this is your statement, the statement I responded to:

"Cowboys did the exact same thing with Dak and it didn't work out for them. QB prices will keep going up exponentially.
Waiting isn't the best answer when it comes to QBs. If he is your QBoF, pay him, if not trade him. It should be that simple."

That' the ONLY thing I'm responding to. This simple scenario, pay him or trade him, is what I am addressing. Pay him or trade him, which you posted. Literally has nothing to do with our other problems that are holding us back from being successful. You get how you're moving the goal posts now? Sheesh.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,449
Reaction score
40,938
Location
UK
Same song & dance.

Everyone here, repeatedly, has said in some form that Kyler has been acting like a jackass about this situation & has preached he folded down the stretch & needs to become a better leader. Repeatedly.

It’s only a select few that won’t or can’t come to realization that are other major problems around the organization. They get mad when that is pointed out due to not it being solely Kyler slander 24/7, even though everyone here has blamed Kyler’s play nonstop.

Credit to Keim. He has swindled those few.


Same song & dance.

BS.

Completely separate issues. Both things exist in isolation.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,449
Reaction score
40,938
Location
UK
Part of the reason that Keim bears the responsibility that many are placing on him is because that kind of result was likely based on the roster assembled.

Aging, injury-prone veterans are likely to produce early in the season and tail off or be injured late. Keim had failed to build a roster that can be resilient in the face of that probable but not inevitable outcome.

I don't really agree with the whole "Vets will get injured and draft picks won't" argument. Football outsiders did some data mining on this back in 2015 which showed very little difference.

It gets a bit lumpy in later years as there are not many players of those ages but you can see in absolute terms there is little difference.

A 21 year old has around 38% chance of missing a week. That dips to around 35-37% for ages 23 to 28. Then it goes up a little but tops out at 41% at age 31.

It's a similar picture for 4 weeks+ where a 25 year old has around 17% risk and a 32 year old just under 20%.

That's bigger in relative terms obviously but it's still only about 10% higher risk for an aging vet vs peak.

Many said Green was going to be an injury bust but he played all 17 games. Same with Conner but he played 15. Conversely Nuk has rarely missed time in his career but missed 7 games. Same with Hudson who has only missed more than 1 game once in 10 years but missed 4 this year. It's almost as if injuries are random.

You must be registered for see images attach
 
Last edited:

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,854
Reaction score
8,294
Location
North of the 49th.
How on earth are Kyler and Kliff stupid enough to have the same agent? It's a massive conflict of interest to represent 2/3 of the people on the hot seat right now. The fact that they both don't see this is the biggest question mark about both of Kliff and Kyler's mental acuity to me...

Ok, you gave us the 'bumper sticker' now explain precisely why this is relevant?
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,854
Reaction score
8,294
Location
North of the 49th.
Can't say that I care how much KM receives in a new deal, however, the percentage of the cap going forward could be a problematic issue.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,851
Dude, this is your statement, the statement I responded to:

"Cowboys did the exact same thing with Dak and it didn't work out for them. QB prices will keep going up exponentially.
Waiting isn't the best answer when it comes to QBs. If he is your QBoF, pay him, if not trade him. It should be that simple."

That' the ONLY thing I'm responding to. This simple scenario, pay him or trade him, is what I am addressing. Pay him or trade him, which you posted. Literally has nothing to do with our other problems that are holding us back from being successful. You get how you're moving the goal posts now? Sheesh.
It helps when you bold the part of the conversion you are referring to, like you just did. Otherwise, when you quote the entire post, we assume that is what you are wanting to talk about.

It's all good though, we agree on the important part... Keim sucks!
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,851
In the 3rd year? Yes

3 weeks after the season ended? Yes
I prefer it, actually. Would we rather be having this conversation after free agency, or after the draft, or even during training camp? I sure as hell wouldn't.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,701
Reaction score
23,790
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
It helps when you bold the part of the conversion you are referring to, like you just did. Otherwise, when you quote the entire post, we assume that is what you are wanting to talk about.

It's all good though, we agree on the important part... Keim sucks!
Lol that WAS your entire post!

But, yes, Keim sucks too :D
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,366
Reaction score
29,729
Location
Gilbert, AZ
All of this appears to be setting a bad precedent. Is Kyler only going to communicate by manipulating his social media or releasing long childish statements through his agent moving forward? Weak sauce.
So weird considering that last week (Thursday or Friday) Michael Bidwill said that he'd spoken to Kyler personally.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,486
Reaction score
34,456
Location
Charlotte, NC
Can't say that I care how much KM receives in a new deal, however, the percentage of the cap going forward could be a problematic issue.
And that raises a great point...signing Kyler now before the upcoming cap increases makes a ton of sense. Projections for the salary cap are pretty bullish, and if you wait too long, the Cardinals might be looking at $50+ million per year instead of $40ish million.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,449
Reaction score
40,938
Location
UK
And that raises a great point...signing Kyler now before the upcoming cap increases makes a ton of sense. Projections for the salary cap are pretty bullish, and if you wait too long, the Cardinals might be looking at $50+ million per year instead of $40ish million.

Not really. Because if Kyler and his agent are acting like this now after 3 years and no real achievements then it's completely within their wheelhouse to pull a Julio a few years down the road.
 
Top