crisper57
Open the Roof!
Also, if he becomes a Pro Bowl guard in a year, I am gonna throw up.
[URL="https://twitter.com/MikeSilver"]Michael Silver @MikeSilver 1h [/URL]The Cardinals took Levi Brown over Adrian Peterson. Then personnel director Steve Keim had to restrain himself in the war room. He's now GM.
Michael Silver @MikeSilver 1h Rod Graves and Ken Whisenhunt wanted a tackle (Brown) & the team had signed Edgerrin James a year earlier. Keim wanted Peterson in worst way
Also, if he becomes a Pro Bowl guard in a year, I am gonna throw up.
What good would it have done to draft Peterson if you don't have an Oline to open up holes.Ouch.Michael Silver @MikeSilver 1h Rod Graves and Ken Whisenhunt wanted a tackle (Brown) & the team had signed Edgerrin James a year earlier. Keim wanted Peterson in worst way
What good would it have done to draft Peterson if you don't have an Oline to open up holes.
Hindsight is 20/20 and there's nothing that says Peterson would have turned into a great rusher for the Cards.
I'm not questioning the talent. Just saying there was no guarantee he would have been successful w/ the Cards. It's all hindsight now.Barry Sanders didn't have an all-star line. You cannot pass up talent that unique at the RB position. Keim was right about Peterson.
What good would it have done to draft Peterson if you don't have an Oline to open up holes.
Hindsight is 20/20 and there's nothing that says Peterson would have turned into a great rusher for the Cards.
I'm not questioning the talent. Just saying there was no guarantee he would have been successful w/ the Cards. It's all hindsight now.
That was a terrible year to draft an OT, but Leonard Davis was available.BS. Peterson doesn't have a great line now and he's still out of this world.
BS. Peterson doesn't have a great line now and he's still out of this world.
I'm not questioning the talent. Just saying there was no guarantee he would have been successful w/ the Cards. It's all hindsight now.
I agree. But it seems like we are reloading a .44 Magnum with .22 shorts.
when you talk about how awful of a decision the pick was at the time it was made, that's not hindsight. that's called foresight.
It's not a stretch to imagine that, I'm just saying there was no guarantee Peterson would have been as successful. He could have just as easily blown out his knees or ankles, or lost confidence from being behind a line that wouldn't open holes for him. That's all I'm saying.It's not hindsight. Keim wanted Peterson then versus an offensive tackle that the Cardinals reached for because Whis and Rod Graves wanted him to fill a need.
I don't think it stretches the imagination to project success for AP in Arizona.
Speaking of foresight, did you hear a Jewish group just bought the Redskins and are going to change the name to the Foreskins?
But if Peterson provides some semblance of a running game, is that enough to keep Matty Boy in @ QB as a game manger type in a run heavy offense?? We might have never seen the resurgance of Warner. Chances are sometime last year there'd have been some, 5-11 with him, 5-11 without him talk.Plus Peterson would have been playing with Warner, Boldin and Fitzgerald. He would have finished last in rushing attempts but still gained 1500 yards a season.
when you talk about how awful of a decision the pick was at the time it was made, that's not hindsight. that's called foresight.
Not true, but you do have to weigh the risk vs the reward and decide if it's worth making the gamble.But, if I remember correctly the "crystal ball" says that you don't select players with an injury history in College.
Not true, but you do have to weigh the risk vs the reward and decide if it's worth making the gamble.
But, if I remember correctly the "crystal ball" says that you don't select players with an injury history in College.